PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Springett

Publications and source records attributed to J Springett.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Why do primary school children smoke? A longitudinal analysis of predictors of smoking uptake during pre-adolescence.

The objectives of this longitudinal study were to determine the prevalence of smoking among primary school children in Liverpool, and to identify the predictors of experimentation with cigarettes during pre-adolescence. A cohort of children (n = 270) completed questionnaires that elicited patterns of child smoking behaviour and children's experiences of smoking in their families and communities each year between the ages of 9 and 11 years. Parents also completed questionnaires. Children's first trials with cigarettes and repeated smoking were reported. The independent variables measured were socio-economic status, familial and peer smoking, and intentions to smoke. By age 11, 27% of children had tried smoking, 12% had smoked repeatedly and 3% were smoking regularly. Variables measured at age 9 predicting experimentation with cigarettes by age 11 were male gender 9P = 0.041) paternal smoking (P = 0.001) fraternal smoking (P = 0.017) a best friend who smoked (P = 0.026) and knowing someone with a smoking-related disease (P = 0.006) Intentions to smoke at age 9 did not predict smoking at age 11 (P < 0.001). In univariate analyses, child smoking was also associated with maternal smoking (P = 0.002 at age 11), living in a low-income household (P < 0.001 at age 10) and living in a deprived area ( P = 0.025 at age 11). Early smoking presents a considerable challenge to health promoters, not least because it is socially patterned. The interventions required must tackle the structural and social pressures that shape smoking behaviour during childhood.

Child↗
PubMed1999

Primary schoolchildrens' perceptions of smoking: implications for health education.

This paper suggests that there is a need, as early as Reception, to implement smoking intervention programmes in the local school curriculum. Findings from a cross-sectional study have shown that primary schoolchildren (4-8 years old) possess negative attitudes and beliefs about smoking, have as yet to establish regular patterns of smoking behaviour, and have a broad understanding of the nature of smoking. Health educators need to capitalize on this negative disposition toward smoking via early intervention; however, to date, there are no smoking-specific health education measures for this age group. The implementation of proactive programmes, before the habit manifests itself, has many supporters but little research has been conducted. This study was devised to fill this significant gap in the literature on smoking. Data was collected on a representative sample of primary schoolchildren in the city of Liverpool. A triangular methodology was adopted consisting of questionnaires (N = 1701), the Draw and Write investigative technique (N = 976), and semi-structured interviews (N = 50). The results highlight the need to implement smoking intervention programmes from Reception onward, the importance of developing a model that is more than just knowledge based and the necessity of involving the family in any school-based health education strategies.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1999

Using care pathways in pressure area management: a pilot study.

Care pathways are a method of managing, delivering and documenting care. A pilot study of a care pathway system in pressure area management was conducted in two clinical areas. Results from this pilot study indicate that the pathway approach to pressure area management is both useful and valid as a means to enhance clinical decision-making and to facilitate comprehensive pressure area management and the completeness of care documentation. Implementation of the pathway requires a facilitator to provide support and education and to monitor and maintain the change process.

Critical Pathways↗
PubMed1998

Does the sedation resulting from sleep deprivation and lorazepam cause similar cognitive deficits?

It is notoriously difficult to assess the contribution of the sedative effects of benzodiazepines to the cognitive impairments that they produce. The purpose of the present experiment was to determine whether a similar pattern of cognitive impairment would be seen in conditions when subjects felt equally sleepy as the result of sleep deprivation. The effects of a sedative dose of lorazepam (2.5 mg) in healthy volunteers was therefore compared with the effects of acute sleep deprivation (a night on-call) in a group of junior doctors and the effects of chronically disturbed sleep due to snoring. Lorazepam, acute sleep deprivation, and chronic sleep disturbance all significantly increased subjective sedation. In addition, lorazepam significantly impaired performance in two tests of psychomotor speed and caused significant anterograde amnesia. Semantic and short-term memory were not impaired by lorazepam, nor was there any impairment in executive function. The only deficit found following acute sleep deprivation was in a test of semantic memory, generating examples from a difficult category. The only significant deficit in the group suffering from chronically disturbed sleep, compared with age-matched controls, was in executive function, and there was a nearly significant impairment in sustained attention. These results suggest that, despite the common factor of increased subjective sedation, the profile of cognitive impairment in the two sleep deprivation groups are neither similar to each other nor to that seen following an acute dose of lorazepam.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Hands across the water.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adaptation, Psychological↗