PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Sra

Publications and source records attributed to J Sra.

72 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Preliminary experience with a hybrid nonthoracotomy defibrillating system that includes a biphasic device: comparison with a standard monophasic device using the same lead system.

OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the advantage of combining a biphasic device with a transvenous system and compared the results with those obtained with a standard monophasic device. BACKGROUND: Available lead systems use monophasic pulses and may require lengthy intraoperative testing to achieve adequate defibrillation threshold in a conspicuous number of patients. The option of biphasic waveform may provide further benefits. However, clinical experience with a permanent implant is lacking. METHODS: Fifty-five patients underwent testing and received a permanent implant using the Endotak lead system associated with a CPI monophasic device. The remaining 36 patients received a permanent implant with the Endotak lead system connected to a biphasic device. In both groups a subcutaneous patch was combined when needed to obtain acceptable defibrillation thresholds. RESULTS: Biphasic pulses resulted in lower mean (+/- SD) defibrillation thresholds (monophasic 15 +/- 4.7 J vs. biphasic 12 +/- 5 J, p = 0.03) and a better implantation rate (100% biphasic vs. 89% monophasic, p = 0.07). Biphasic pulses allowed implantation with less ventricular fibrillation induction (7.4 +/- 3.2 vs. 3.5 +/- 1.8, p < 0.01) and a mean shorter procedure time (168 +/- 39 vs. 111 +/- 30 min, p < 0.01). With the biphasic waveform a greater proportion of patients met the implantation criteria with the lead system alone (83% vs. 45%, p < 0.01). When needed, the left prepectoral location of the patch electrode was always sufficient in left subscapular position was required in 15 patients in the monophasic group. Implantation of the biphasic device was associated with a shorter mean hospital stay (3.8 +/- 0.8 vs. 5.4 +/- 2.2 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of a biphasic device in a transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator uniformly increases the efficacy of the system and the ease of implantation.

Adult↗

Ventricular fibrillation and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia with critical coronary artery stenosis: does bypass surgery suffice?

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have suggested that coronary artery bypass surgery is sufficient to prevent recurrence of sudden death in patients with critical coronary artery stenosis presenting with ventricular fibrillation or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. We present our experience in patients with one or more episodes of sudden death associated with documented ventricular fibrillation or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and severe operable coronary artery disease who underwent defibrillator implant at the time of bypass surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients (age 63 +/- 8 years) were included in this study. Eighteen of the 58 patients had no evidence of previous myocardial infarction. The mean ejection fraction was 37 +/- 13%. All patients underwent electrophysiologic study before and after revascularization. At the time of first defibrillator discharge, each patient was reevaluated to exclude the presence of ischemia. The benefits of defibrillator implant were estimated comparing the projected survival based upon defibrillator discharge preceded by syncope or presyncope with survival curves generated including total death and sudden plus cardiac death. After a mean follow-up of 4.6 +/- 2 years, 22 patients received appropriate shocks preceded by syncope or presyncope, and an additional 19 patients received asymptomatic shocks. At 4 years, survival free of total death was 71.2%, and the projected survival was 58.8% (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that ejection fraction lower than 30% and induction of arrhythmia with one or two extrastimuli (S2, S3) were independent predictors for defibrillator discharge. None of the remaining variables including age, gender, number of bypasses, history of myocardial infarction, and type of arrhythmias induced were predictive for death and occurrence of shocks. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ventricular fibrillation and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, bypass surgery does not protect from recurrence of life-threatening arrhythmias, and, as in our population, defibrillator implant may have significant impact on survival.

Adult↗

Bundle branch reentry: a mechanism of ventricular tachycardia in the absence of myocardial or valvular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present bundle branch reentry as the mechanism of sustained ventricular tachycardia in the absence of myocardial or valvular dysfunction. BACKGROUND: Previous reports have documented the relation between structural heart disease and bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia. Myocardial or valvular dysfunction has thus far been recognized as the only anatomic substrate for the development of this tachycardia. METHODS: Three patients with a wide QRS complex tachycardia underwent noninvasive and invasive cardiac evaluation and electrophysiologic studies to identify the substrate and mechanism of tachycardia. Catheter ablation of the right bundle branch using radiofrequency current was performed in each patient. RESULTS: The patients were all men (aged 54, 34 and 72 years) who presented with presyncope, palpitation and cardiac arrest, respectively. Electrocardiography during sinus rhythm revealed nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay in all three patients. Cardiac evaluation revealed no evidence of myocardial or valvular dysfunction in any patient. The baseline HV interval was prolonged in each patient (90, 100 and 75 ms, respectively). Programmed right ventricular stimulation initiated bundle branch reentrant tachycardia with typical left (three patients) and right (one patient) bundle branch block pattern. Catheter ablation of the right bundle branch using radiofrequency current abolished bundle branch reentry in all three patients. After 26-, 13- and 8-month follow-up periods, complete right bundle branch block persisted, and all three patients remained asymptomatic without antiarrhythmic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained bundle branch reentry can be a clinical arrhythmia in patients with no identifiable myocardial or valvular dysfunction except for isolated conduction abnormalities in the His-Purkinje system. This mechanism of tachycardia should be recognized during electrophysiologic evaluation, given the seriousness of this arrhythmia and the availability of the effective treatment.

Adult↗

Physics and engineering of transcatheter cardiac tissue ablation.

Ablation of arrhythmogenic cardiac tissues has emerged as one of the most important advances in cardiac electrophysiology. With the introduction of transcatheter ablation, the treatment of ventricular tachycardia, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and other cardiac arrhythmias has progressed from an expensive and painful surgical therapy accompanied by a long recovery period to the less expensive, less traumatic transcatheter approach. The feasibility of cardiac ablation, along with the increasing number of physicians using the technique, requires understanding of the anatomic and electrophysiologic bases of transcatheter ablation as well as the different technologies, their limitations and complications. This report provides an overview of the physical, scientific and technical aspects of cardiac ablation performed with the methods currently available and a summary of the limitations of each method and expected future technologic developments in this growing field. Emphasis is placed on radiofrequency and direct current energies, the primary methods now used. Methods such as cryoablation and laser, and microwave and chemical ablation are discussed with less detail because the method of delivering energy for these ablative procedures has not been fully developed.

Animals↗

Cardioversion, defibrillation, and overdrive pacing of ventricular arrhythmias: the effect of moricizine in dogs with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.

The purpose of this investigation is to define whether the antiarrhythmic drug moricizine has beneficial or adverse effects on currently used antitachycardia and antifibrillatory devices. These studies were performed in a dog model of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). In 11 dogs, the left anterior descending artery and all surrounding epicardial collateral feeder vessels were ligated. Defibrillator patches were implanted and the dogs were allowed to recover. After a 7-day recovery period, effective refractory period (ERP), end diastolic threshold (EDT), VT induction, and VT and ventricular fibrillation (VF) termination data were collected before and after moricizine infusion (2 mg/kg). In this experimental model, moricizine caused the following electrophysiological changes: a prolongation of the ERP from 173 +/- 14 to 182 +/- 15 (P < 0.02) with no significant effect on the EDT for pacing; a prolongation of the VT cycle length from 175 +/- 18 to 201 +/- 23 msec (P < 0.003); an increased cycle length required for overdrive pacing from 136 +/- 20 to 157 +/- 22 msec (P < 0.01); no effect on the energy required to cardiovert VT; an increase in the defibrillation threshold from 7.5 +/- 4 to 9.4 +/- 4 joules (P < 0.006) and; in 5 of the 8 dogs with VT, the VT could be initiated with somewhat less aggressive stimulation. Significant beneficial electrophysiological physiological effects were noted on the VT cycle length, including a proportionately prolonged overdrive pacing cycle length for VT termination.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator for prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation: ICD therapy in sudden cardiac death.

Among the various therapy options for survivors of ventricular tachycardia-ventricular fibrillation (VT-VF), the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) seems most promising. It reliably terminates VT-VF and thus significantly impacts sudden cardiac death (SCD) survival. It is more effective than any of the known antiarrhythmic drugs in prevention of SCD, particularly among survivors of cardiac arrest. Compared to VT surgery, the ICD therapy can be offered to a larger pool of patients and can be placed at a lower surgical risk. With proper patient selection, ICD therapy is of major benefits to its recipients since it markedly reduces the chances of VT-VF related mortality; the main cause of premature death in this population. The ICD therapy is cost effective when compared to other medical interventions and could be more so if the implant is carried out early in the course of VT-VF management.

Death, Sudden, Cardiac↗

Bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia: cumulative experience in 48 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical, electrophysiologic features and follow-up of 48 patients with inducible bundle branch reentrant (BBR) tachycardia are presented. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were identified in whom a diagnosis of BBR tachycardia was made during electrophysiologic evaluation. The clinical presentation was syncope or sudden death in 38 patients, and sustained palpitations during wide QRS complex tachycardia in 5 patients. Electrophysiologic studies were performed in 5 additional patients for various other reasons. Structural heart disease was present in 45 patients. Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease were the anatomical substrates in 19 (39%) and 24 (50%) patients, respectively, severe aortic regurgitation was present in 2 patients, and no organic heart disease was identified in 3. All 48 patients had evidence of His-Purkinje system disease. BBR tachycardia with left and right bundle branch block morphologies was induced in 46 and 5 patients, respectively, and interfascicular BBR tachycardia was initiated in 2 patients. Ventricular tachycardia of a myocardial origin was induced in 11 patients. Management of BBR tachycardia included transcatheter bundle branch ablation in 28 patients, and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in 16 patients. Four patients were treated with implantable defibrillators. After a mean follow-up of 15.8 months in 42 patients, there were 13 deaths due to congestive heart failure, 4 sudden cardiac deaths, 3 nonsudden cardiac deaths, and 3 noncardiac related deaths. CONCLUSION: Sustained BBR, a form of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, is a highly malignant arrhythmia usually seen in patients with structural heart disease. Three different types of BBR tachycardia are described. If distinguished from ventricular tachycardia of a myocardial origin, catheter ablation of the right bundle branch can be easily performed and effectively eliminates BBR. During follow-up, congestive heart failure is the most common cause of death in this population.

Adult↗

Atrioventricular nodal reentry. Clinical, electrophysiological, and therapeutic considerations.

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry is a relatively common cause of regular, narrow QRS tachycardia. The underlying basis for this arrhythmia is functional (and anatomic) duality of pathways in the region of the AV node, although the exact boundaries of the reentrant circuit have not been convincingly defined. During the more common type of AV nodal reentry (seen in approximately 90% of cases), a slow conducting pathway is used in the anterograde direction, and a fast pathway is operative in the retrograde direction. In the uncommon form, the direction of impulse propagation within the reentrant circuit is reversed. In this article, the clinical, ECG, and electrophysiological features of AV nodal reentry as well as approaches to therapy are discussed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical diagnosis may be made from the surface ECG. In the common type of AV nodal reentry, the P wave is obscured by the QRS or may be present in its terminal portion. The P wave in the uncommon form occurs late (i.e., in or after the T wave), producing a pattern of long RP and short PR. Both forms of AV nodal reentry are controllable with various therapeutic modalities. For acute termination, adenosine is probably the ideal agent. Prevention of recurrences can be achieved with several pharmacological agents, including beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and class Ia, Ic, and III antiarrhythmic agents. Curative therapy is now available with a variety of nonpharmacological methods. However, the most promising therapy at the present time is catheter modification of the AV node by ablation of either the fast or slow pathway, using radiofrequency energy. Ablation of the fast pathway carries a higher risk of second- or third-degree AV block. Slow pathway ablation, by providing a high rate of success and minimal risk of AV block, seems to be a more acceptable initial approach. CONCLUSIONS: AV nodal reentry is a common cause of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and a precise diagnosis can be made with intracardiac electrophysiological evaluation. Although the arrhythmia responds to a variety of antiarrhythmic agents, curative therapy can now be offered with catheter modification of the AV node using radiofrequency energy. At the time of this writing, it seems that catheter modification of the AV node is rapidly becoming the therapy of initial choice in patients with symptomatic AV nodal reentrant tachycardia requiring treatment.

Adult↗

Control of supraventricular tachycardia with transcatheter ablative technique using radio frequency as the energy source.

Supraventricular tachycardia constitutes a significant clinical problem, frequently requiring medical intervention. We analyzed data in 413 consecutive patients with supraventricular tachycardia treated at our center with the catheter ablative technique and found the following outcome. Among 272 patients who had regular narrow QRS tachycardia without ventricular pre-excitation during sinus rhythm (Group I), control was achieved in all but one case (success rate 99.6%). Patients in Group II had ventricular pre-excitation during sinus rhythm and narrow or wide QRS tachycardia. Elimination of ventricular pre-excitation and control of the tachycardia was achieved in 104 of the 106 cases in this group (a success rate of 98%). Group III patients had atrial flutter-fibrillation as the predominate arrhythmia and control of rapid ventricular response was successfully achieved with atrioventricular junctional ablation in all 35 cases. Serious complications were related to anticoagulation and were seen in less than 2% of the cases. There were no instances of thromboembolic phenomena or death related to these procedures. It is concluded that the catheter ablative technique with radio frequency as the energy source is a highly effective means for control of supraventricular tachycardia with minimal associated risk of serious complications.

Adult↗

Role of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in the management of high-risk patients.

Cardiovascular mortality from ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) continues to be a major health problem. Several therapeutic approaches are now available to treat patients with known VT/VF. Among the various therapeutic options are antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter or surgical ablation of VT focus, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The overall 2-year cardiovascular mortality is significantly reduced by ICD therapy. The ICD is particularly useful in patients with 1) no inducible but clinical VT/VF, 2) drug refractory VT/VF, and 3) VT/VF in association with left ventricular ejection fraction of less than or equal to 30%. Significant improvements in ICD therapy have already been made; these improvements include tiered antitachycardia therapy, antibradycardia pacing, lower defibrillation threshold, and longer life of generator. Further improvements are expected, including nonthoracotomy approach to defibrillation, pectoral implant, and dual chamber sensing. It is likely that with all of the advances in ICD therapy its acceptance as a therapeutic option will increase.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

Cardiovascular causes of syncope. Identifying and controlling trigger mechanisms.

Syncope usually has a cardiovascular source, so neurologic evaluation has a low diagnostic yield in these patients. Cardiac arrhythmias in persons with or without structural heart disease can produce syncope. Neurocardiogenic dysfunction that results in diminished venous return and hypercontractility is another frequent cause. Postural hypotension or left ventricular outflow obstruction may also be to blame. Careful history taking and physical examination, head-up tilt testing, echocardiography or radionuclide isotope imaging, and electrophysiologic study are often diagnostic. However, syncope remains undiagnosed in some patients, and they may require periodic reassessment. Treatment options are available for most cardiovascular disorders, among them use of pharmacologic agents; catheter, surgical, or radio-frequency modification of certain tachycardias; and permanent pacing.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗

When is it safe not to replace an implantable cardioverter defibrillator generator?

In most reports on patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators, shocks were received mainly during the first 2 to 3 years. Thus, the question had been raised as to the need for device replacement after 3 or 4 years if no shocks had been received. In order to answer this question, shock experience in 184 patients receiving the implantable cardioverter defibrillator was analyzed. Patients were followed for a mean of 24 +/- 18.7 months. A patient's shock was judged to be appropriate if there was electrocardiographic documentation of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia at the time of shock or if it was preceded by sudden onset of presyncopal or syncopal symptoms. The majority of patients had coronary artery disease. In approximately two-thirds of patients, left ventricular ejection fraction was below 40%. One hundred fourteen patients had inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. On follow-up, there were 29 deaths, five of which were sudden. Sixty-eight patients received an appropriate shock during follow-up (37%). Over 90% of these 68 received their first shock within the 2 years after implant. The actuarial risk of receiving an appropriate shock by the fifth year after implant was 69%. Conversely, 31% of patients who survived 5 years had not received an appropriate shock. Hazard analysis indicates that there is a high incidence of first appropriate shock during the year following implant. Subsequently, the incidence dropped to a relatively steady rate with a rise in this rate during the fifth year. This analysis suggested a bimodal distribution of appropriate shocks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Actuarial Analysis↗

Maintenance of atrioventricular sequence after His-bundle ablation for paroxysmal supraventricular rhythm disorders: a unique use of the fallback mode in dual chamber pacemakers.

The usual mode of controlling ventricular rate after His-bundle ablation is placement of a ventricular demand rate responsive pacemaker. Atrioventricular synchrony is therefore lost in individuals whose atrial rhythm disturbances are paroxysmal. Thirty-seven His ablations were performed at this institution, since January of 1983, for atrial rhythm disturbances that were not suppressible with medical therapy alone. Of those, ten patients were identified whose atrial rhythm disturbances were intermittent and who would otherwise benefit by having proper atrioventricular sequence during sinus rhythm. These patients underwent placement of a dual chamber pacemaker system having a fallback mode. At a mean follow-up period of 17 +/- 11 months, eight patients continued to maintain proper atrioventricular sequence with ventricular pacing tracking atrial activation during sinus rhythm. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmic attacks were associated with attainment of the programmed upper rate limit at which time the fallback mode was activated and the pacemaker automatically converted to a ventricular demand (VVI) mode. Restoration of normal sinus rhythm was associated with restoration of proper atrioventricular sequence. Two patients have developed chronic atrial fibrillation and their pacemakers continue to function in the fallback mode as VVI devices. In conclusion, intermittent supraventricular tachyarrhythmias which are resistant to drug therapy can be treated with His ablation and dual chamber pacing utilizing special pacemaker features such as the fallback mode.

Bundle of His↗

Sudden cardiac death.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

Atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, mechanisms and management.

The incidence of AF, the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice, increases with age and coronary artery disease, hypertension and valvular heart disease are common underlying substrates; however, occasionally, AF may occur without any underlying heart disease. The most widely accepted theory of its mechanism is Moe's multiple wavelet hypothesis, although recent studies are helping to shed light on other mechanisms, including the focal origin of AF in some patients. Most patients experience palpitations, but fatigue, dyspnoea, and dizziness may also occur. Therapy includes prevention of thromboembolism, control of rate, and restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. The risks and benefits of each treatment modality need to be assessed according to each patient's circumstances. Unlike other arrhythmias, there is still no highly successful therapy for treating AF. However, significant advances are being made using non-pharmacological approaches to either prevent or cure this troublesome arrhythmia.

Amiodarone↗

Management strategies in patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death following myocardial infarction.

Over 50 percent of deaths in patients who survive an acute myocardial infarction (MI) are due to fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Patients who survive an episode of sustained ventricular arrhythmia are at highest risk of recurrent cardiac arrest. Electrophysiological studies have been found to be useful in guiding therapy and reducing mortality in these patients. However, evaluation and treatment of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia following MI remains controversial. Asymptomatic patients at high risk after MI include those who have significant left ventricular dysfunction, positive late potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG), high grade ventricular ectopy and abnormal heart rate variability. These tests, however, have a low positive predictive accuracy and are not helpful to guide therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs which are usually ineffective and can frequently harm these patients. Beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agents, however, have been shown to reduce mortality after an acute myocardial infarction.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗