Suicide and overdose among opiate addicts.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J Strang.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Although gender-related issues are often cited as playing an important part in determining patterns of illicit drug use, little is known about the differences between male and female drug users outside treatment settings. In the present study, 558 heroin and cocaine users recruited from a range of community settings were interviewed by Privileged Access Interviewers. The women were found to be younger than the men. Differences existed in their drug use; women used smaller amounts, for a shorter duration, and were less likely to inject than their male counterparts. No differences existed between treatment contact for the heroin users, but differences were found among the cocaine-using sample, with men being more likely to have contacted a treatment agency. Men were financing themselves through more criminal activities than women. Drug-using sexual partners were found to be an important influence over women's drug use, with most female injectors having been given their first injection by a male sexual partner. Structural differences in patterns of drug use found among female drug users and the influence of male sexual partners are likely to play an important role in determining appropriate treatment options for women drug users.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This communication addresses the analytical problems associated with the analysis of hair specimens from known users and misusers of the synthetic opioid methadone. An adapted radioimmunoassay and a previously developed preanalytical decontamination procedure have been applied to samples from known drug users. The removal of drugs from the hair surface by washing and the effect of proprietary hair treatments on methadone entrapped in the hair have also been investigated. Pre-analytical washing reduced methadone levels by up to 29%, whilst hair colouration and peroxide bleaching were found to reduce levels by up to 21% and 50% respectively. Methadone assay of extracts from dated hair segments were shown to provide long-term histories of methadone intake, under controlled and non-controlled conditions. Evidence that a dose relationship between hair drug levels and intake may exist is presented. Results of hair analysis, expressed as ng methadone/mg hair, from drug users (range 0.20-10.63) are compared to a pre-determined cut-off of 0.1 ng methadone/mg hair, obtained from the analysis of a known drug free population (n = 23).
The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) was devised to provide a short, easily administered scale which can be used to measure the degree of dependence experienced by users of different types of drugs. The SDS contains five items, all of which are explicitly concerned with psychological components of dependence. These items are specifically concerned with impaired control over drug taking and with preoccupation and anxieties about drug use. The SDS was given to five samples of drug users in London and Sydney. The samples comprised users of heroin and users of cocaine in London, and users of amphetamines and methadone maintenance patients in Sydney. The SDS satisfies a number of criteria which indicate its suitability as a measure of dependence. All SDS items load significantly with a single factor, and the total SDS score was extremely highly correlated with the single factor score. The SDS score is related to behavioural patterns of drug taking that are, in themselves, indicators of dependence, such as dose, frequency of use, duration of use, daily use and degree of contact with other drug users; it also shows criterion validity in that drug users who have sought treatment at specialist and non-specialist agencies for drug problems have higher SDS scores than non-treatment samples. The psychometric properties of the scale were good in all five samples, despite being applied to primary users of different classes of drug, using different recruitment procedures in different cities in different countries.
The present study looks at the association between drug and alcohol use and sexual risk behaviours in a sample of 51 women who were currently working as prostitutes and also currently using opiates and/or stimulants. Most women reported regularly using condoms with clients but a substantial minority sometimes had unprotected sex with clients. There was no overall association between any of the drug use variables (including the use of crack cocaine) and the likelihood of unprotected sex. The use of drugs appears to have affected the sexual practices of different women in different ways: a substantial minority (just under a quarter of the sample) reported that for them, drug use did reduce the chances that they would use a condom. There was a link between willingness to have unprotected sex for more money and drinking larger amounts and drinking more often. The results also indicate that these women were exposed to a variety of health risks, including sharing injecting equipment and having unprotected sex with their regular partner who was often a current or former drug injector. A sub-sample (n = 34) completed a confidential questionnaire which showed that one-third had previously had at least one sexually transmitted disease and 15% of them had been infected during the previous year. These findings about rates of STD infection raise questions about the extent to which self-reported condom use by prostitutes can be used as an indicator of actual levels of infection risk.
Research studying HIV risk-taking behaviour has tended to focus on specific populations who are characterized by particular behaviours. Such practices include the extent of unprotected anal intercourse among homosexual men, the sharing of injecting equipment among drug users and unprotected vaginal intercourse among female sex workers. There is often a failure among both researchers and practitioners to address specific risk behaviours outside of the defined risk group. Reviewed here are studies of heterosexual anal intercourse, with special attention to drug users and female sex workers. Among the general population, the reporting of heterosexual anal intercourse varies greatly across time and cultural groups. However, a body of recent research suggests that, despite some geographical differences, rates in most countries are relatively high. Many studies have also found that associated condom usage is low. Although unprotected anal intercourse is known to be an efficient method for the transmission of HIV and other viral infections, it has rarely been addressed outside cohorts of men who have sex with men. Of particular concern is the interaction of risk behaviours among drug users and women engaging in prostitution, many studies having found high levels of unprotected anal intercourse among these groups. Harm reduction interventions must address all the health risk behaviours their target groups are engaging in, if the challenge of reducing the transmission of HIV and other viral infections is to be met.
We have previously demonstrated a dose response relationship in Hodgkin's disease for the combination of BCNU, VP16, Ara C and Melphalan, with the superior efficacy of the BEAM regimen requiring haemopoietic support, compared with miniBEAM. To further exploit this, we have attempted to escalate the VP16 dose in BEAM. The standard etoposide dose is 200 mg/m2 IV for four days. Thirty seven patients with refractory lymphoma received 400 mg/m2/day of etoposide, and 13 patients 600 mg/m2/day, in addition to BCNU, cytarabine, and melphalan. Toxicity and outcome parameters were compared in the preceding 40 patients, who received 200 mg/m2/day etoposide. The toxic mortality with 400 mg/m2/day of etoposide (3%) was identical to that for the standard BEAM regimen (5%). Two procedure related deaths occurred in the highest VP16 dose group (15%). The morbidity of the lower etoposide dose regimens was comparable, but 600 mg/m2/day induced significantly greater gastrointestinal toxicity. Twelve of the 13 patients receiving this dose suffered grade II-IV mucositis, with stomatitis, dysphagia and prolonged diarrhoea; 5 haemodynamically significant gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and 1 fatal toxic colitis. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor did not influence the nonhaematological toxicity. The three month response rates were similar (91%) in all dose cohorts. The maximum tolerable etoposide dose within the BEAM regimen is thus 400 mg/m2 for four days.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study investigates the extent to which heroin users are exposed to multiple forms of infection risk. Structured interviews were administered to a prospective network sample of 408 heroin users. Subjects were contracted in south London in a wide range of social settings by specially recruited privileged access interviewers. Most heroin users (74.5%) had been exposed to more than one infection risk factor and more than half of the sample had been exposed to three or more risk factors. HIV serostatus was primarily related to men having sex with men. Hepatitis B seropositive status was primarily related to the number of years injecting drugs. At this stage of the HIV epidemic in London, HIV infection among heroin users may be related more to homosexual risk behaviour than drug risk factors. Heroin injectors were at greater risk of infection than heroin chasers both through their sexual behaviour as well as through their injecting practices. Heroin users who refused to give a saliva sample for analysis were found to be more likely to engage in several health risk behaviours than those who provided samples. This finding has important methodological implications for seroprevalence surveys. Other implications of the results for prevention programmes aimed at health risk behaviours of heroin users are also discussed.
A community sample of 408 heroin users was interviewed about changes in their predominant route of heroin administration. Clear preferences for specific routes of drug administration were evident. Two predominant routes of administration were found: injection (54%) and 'chasing the dragon' (44%). More than a third of the sample had changed their predominant route of administration (a 'transition'). Most commonly, only one transition was reported, from chasing to injecting. However, transition to injection was not inevitable: the majority of 'chasers' had never moved to regular injecting despite often using at high doses for many years. Modelling suggests that many chasers give up heroin without moving to injecting. The results indicate, however, a continuing risk of switching from chasing to injecting for those who continued to use. Women were less likely to move from chasing to injecting. Some heroin users had made the transition from injection to chasing; 28 (16%) of the current chasers had previously been regular heroin injectors. This change in route is less well-known and to our knowledge has not been previously investigated. Multiple transitions in route were uncommon; predominant route of administration, once established appears robust. Harm reduction interventions directed towards changing the risk behaviours of heroin users should take account of the different routes of current administration and the potential for future transitions within continued drug use.
The precise manner in which the use of different types of drugs is related to prostitution has not been adequately researched. This study investigates patterns of drug-taking and sexual behaviour among a group of women working as prostitutes in south London; it also looks at prostitution in which sex is offered in return for drugs, at the links between heroin, cocaine and alcohol use and sexual behaviour, and at the association between severity of dependence and sexual behaviour. All of the women in our sample (n = 51) were actively working as prostitutes. More than half of them had given sex for drugs, though this was a relatively infrequent occurrence. The majority of them were using heroin and many of them were moderately or severely dependent upon heroin. More than one-third had shared injecting equipment after it had already been used. Almost two-thirds reported that they only worked as a prostitute in order to fund their use of drugs (predominantly heroin), and that they would not continue working as a prostitute if they were not still using drugs. The more severely dependent upon heroin they were, the more likely they were to report these links between heroin use and prostitution. About half of the women in our sample said that they first started to work as a prostitute in order to pay for drugs. The women who began to use heroin prior to prostitution were more severely dependent on heroin and described themselves as being trapped in prostitution by the need to maintain a supply of heroin. Very few women regularly used cocaine in association with their prostitution. There are grounds for concern about the alcohol consumption of these women. About one-quarter of the women said that they used alcohol every day; some of them reported drinking at levels which greatly exceed recommended limits for women, and some were drinking at levels which were likely to be physically damaging.
This paper explores the varied and potentially conflicting goals of preventive measures as applied to opiate use. These goals relate both to the overall extent of opiate use and the amount of harm arising from this drug use. Prevention involves the control both of the supply side and the demand for opiates. Particular targets may include sharing equipment, injecting, progression to more harmful routes of administration, prevention of development of dependence, harmful sequelae of opiate use and co-morbidity. There may be a place for manipulating the black market for opiates to channel users in directions that achieve particular prevention goals, and being more selective about targeting particular groups of users at particular times. It is the role of scientists to quantify the dimensions of harm and the likely impact on these dimensions of particular interventions. It is then up to elected representatives to determine the priorities.