PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Swartout

Publications and source records attributed to J Swartout.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Derivation of U.S. EPA's oral Reference Dose (RfD) for methylmercury.

Mercury (Hg) cycles in the environment through a series of complex chemical and physical transformations that occur in air, soils, and water bodies. One component of the environmental mercury cycle is the formation of methylmercury (MHg) primarily by aquatic and marine microorganisms and the accumulation of MHg in foodwebs, particularly in piscivorous species. Human consumption of piscivorous fish and other piscivorus animals is the most common pathway of exposure to MHg. For non-carcinogenic toxic endpoints, the U.S. EPA typically develops a Reference Dose (RfD). This is generally interpreted to be a concentration of a chemical which can be consumed on a daily basis over a lifetime without expectation of adverse effect. There is substantial evidence in both animal and humans that MHg is a neurotoxicant in the adult and the child as well as a developmental neurotoxicant for the fetus. Epidemics of MHg poisoning in Japan and Iraq have resulted from high-dose exposures to MHg. In these epidemics adults, children, nursing infants and fetuses were affected by MHg. The epidemics demonstrate that neurotoxicity is the health effect of greatest concern and that effects on the developing human nervous system apparently occur at lower exposures than those affecting the adult nervous system. We describe how the data from the Iraqi MHg epidemic were used to derive the current RfD of 0.1 microgram/Kgbw/day (U.S. EPA, 1995;).

Administration, Oral↗

Uncertainty analysis of the estimated ingestion rates used to derive the methylmercury reference dose.

The U.S. EPA's Reference Dose (RfD) for methylmercury (MeHg) uses a simple one-compartment toxicokinetic model to estimate ingestion doses in mg/kg-day from measured concentrations of mercury in hair. The model includes a number of input variables for which point estimates are made. Uncertainty in the inputs is addressed by the use of a 3-fold uncertainty factor. There are, however, published ranges for each variable which are used to develop distributions for each of the inputs. Monte Carlo output of the model is generated. The 90% confidence interval spans a 3-fold to 5-fold range of ingestion doses for any given concentration of mercury in hair. The hair:blood mercury concentration ratio contributes most to the variance of the output. The results indicate that the uncertainty factor of three is appropriate.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗

Characterization of risks posed by combustor emissions.

Risk characterization is the final step of the risk assessment process as practiced in the U.S. EPA. In risk characterization, the major scientific evidence and "bottom-line" results from the other components of the risk assessment process, hazard identification, dose-response assessment, and exposure assessment, are evaluated and integrated into an overall conclusion about the risks posed by a given situation. Risk characterization is also an iterative process; the results of a specific step may require re-evaluation or additional information to finalize the risk assessment process. Risks posed by atmospheric emissions are an example of an involuntary human health risk which typically receives a great deal of public attention. Characterization of the risks posed by atmospheric emissions typically requires the use of mathematical models to evaluate: 1) the environmental fate of emitted pollutants, 2) exposures to these pollutants, and 3) human dose-response. Integration of these models results in quantitative risk estimates. The confidence in a quantitative risk estimate is examined by evaluating uncertainty and variability within individual risk assessment components. Variability arises from the true heterogeneity in characteristics within a population or an event; on the other hand, uncertainty represents lack of knowledge about the true value used in a risk estimate. U.S. EPA's 1997 Mercury Study will illustrate some aspects of the risk characterization process as well as the uncertainty and variability encountered in the risk assessment process.

Air Pollutants↗

Derivation of wildlife values for mercury.

A procedure has been developed to estimate surface water concentrations of toxicants ("wildlife values") that will protect the viability of wildlife populations associated with aquatic resources. This procedure was designed primarily to protect piscivorous birds and mammals from compounds that bioaccumulate in fish and was used in the Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative (GLI) to calculate wildlife values (WV) for mercury, DDT/DDE, total polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD). Published in 1995, and expressed as total mercury in unfiltered water, the final wildlife value (WVf) for mercury derived in the GLI was 1300 pg Hg/L. This value was selected as the wildlife criterion (WC) for mercury in the Great Lakes basin. A second WVf for mercury was derived in 1997 as part of a Congressionally mandated report on airborne mercury emissions. These calculations were based upon mercury speciation data that were largely unavailable when the GLI was developed. Important features of the WVf in the Report to Congress include its calculation on a dissolved methylmercury basis and a reliance on field data to estimate fish bioaccumulation factors. Calculated as methylmercury in filtered water, the WVf derived in the report is 50 pg Hg/L (equivalent to 54 pg MeHg/L). A comparison of WV in the GLI and the Report to Congress requires that average values be specified for mercury speciation in natural systems. Based on this information, the WVf given in the report corresponds to a value of 910 pg Hg/L, as total mercury in unfiltered water, or about 70% of the WVf derived in the GLI. In this article we describe the algorithm used to derive WV in the GLI and the Report to Congress and review its application to mercury. Scientific uncertainties in deriving WV, particularly as they apply to mercury, are critically examined.

Animals↗