PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J T Fuller

Publications and source records attributed to J T Fuller.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Induction of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, T helper cells, and protective levels of antibody in humans by particle-mediated administration of a hepatitis B virus DNA vaccine.

A DNA vaccine against the hepatitis B virus (HBV) was evaluated for safety and induction of immune responses in 12 healthy, hepatitis-naïve human volunteers using the needle-free PowderJect system to deliver gold particles coated with DNA directly into cells of the skin. Three groups of four volunteers received three administrations of DNA encoding the surface antigen of HBV at one of the three dose levels (1, 2, or 4 microg). The vaccine was safe and well tolerated, causing only transient and mild to moderate responses at the site of administration. HBV-specific antibody and both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were measured before and after each immunization. All the volunteers developed protective antibody responses of at least 10 mIU/ml. In volunteers who were positive for the HLA class I A2 allele, the vaccine also induced antigen-specific CD8+ T cells that bound HLA-A2/HBsAg(335-343) tetramers, secreted IFN-gamma, and lysed target cells presenting a hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) CTL epitope. Enumeration of HBsAg-specific T cells producing cytokine indicated preferential induction of a Type 1 T helper cell response. These results provide the first demonstration of a DNA vaccine inducing protective antibody titers and both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in humans.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Tolerability and immune responses in humans to a PowderJect DNA vaccine for hepatitis B.

We are developing a DNA vaccine toward hepatitis-B virus (HBV) using PowderJect's proprietary needle-free technology to deliver DNA-coated gold particles directly into cells of the skin. Preclinical studies in animals showed that (i) microgram doses of the DNA vaccine were sufficient to immunize pigs and non-human primates to antibody levels comparable to those obtained with a commercial recombinant subunit vaccine; (ii) the DNA vaccine was effective in mouse strains that respond poorly to protein subunit vaccines; (iii) the vaccine induces robust cytotoxic T-cell responses, and (iv) the vaccine is non-toxic and well tolerated. Based on these findings, this DNA vaccine was evaluated for safety, tolerability, and the induction of immune responses in phase 1 clinical studies in healthy, hepatitis-naïve human volunteers. Preliminary results indicate that the vaccine is safe and well tolerated, and elicits both humoral and cellular immune responses in man.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Route and method of delivery of DNA vaccine influence immune responses in mice and non-human primates.

BACKGROUND: In spite of the large number of studies that have evaluated DNA-based immunization, few have directly compared the immune responses generated by different routes of immunization, particularly in non-human primates. Here we examine the ability of a hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-encoding plasmid to induce immune responses in mice and non-human primates (rhesus monkeys: Macaca mulatta) after delivery by a number of routes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight different injected [intraperitoneal (IP), intradermal (ID), intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), intraperineal (IPER), subcutaneous (SC), sublingual (SL), vaginal wall (VW)] and six noninjected [intranasal inhalation (INH), intranasal instillation (INS), intrarectal (IR), intravaginal (IVAG), ocular (Oc), oral feeding (oral)] routes and the gene gun (GG) were used to deliver HBsAg-expressing plasmid DNA to BALB/c mice. Sera were assessed for HBsAg-specific antibodies (anti-HBs, IgG, IgG1, IgG2a) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity measured. Three of the most commonly used routes (IM, ID, GG) were compared in rhesus monkeys, also using HBsAg-expressing vectors. Monkeys were immunized with short (0-, 4- and 8-week) or long (0-, 12- and 24-week) intervals between boosts, and in the case of GG, also with different doses, and their sera were assessed for anti-HBs. RESULTS: In one study, anti-HBs were detected in plasma of mice treated by five of eight of the injected and none of the six noninjected routes. The highest levels of anti-HBs were induced by IM and IV injections, although significant titers were also obtained with SL and ID. Each of these routes also induced CTL, as did IPER and VW and one noninjected route (INH) that failed to induce antibodies. In a second study, GG (1.6 microg) was compared to ID and IM (100 microg) delivery. Significant titers were obtained by all routes after only one boost, with the highest levels detected by IM. Delivery to the skin by GG induced exclusively IgG1 antibodies (Th2-like) at 4 weeks and only very low IgG2a levels at later times; ID-immunized mice had predominantly IgG1 at 4 weeks and this changed to mixed IgG1/IgG2a over time. Responses with IM injection (in the leg or tongue) were predominantly IgG2a (Th1-like) at all times. IV injection gave mixed IgG1/IgG2a responses. In monkeys, in the first experiment, 1 mg DNA IM or ID at 0, 4, and 8 weeks gave equivalent anti-HB titers and 0.4 microg at the same times by GG induced lower titers. In the second experiment, 1 mg DNA IM or ID, or 3.2 microg by GG, at 0, 12, and 24 weeks, gave anti-HB values in the hierarchy of GG > IM > ID. Furthermore, high titers were retained after a single immunization in mice but fell off over time in the monkeys, even after boost. CONCLUSIONS: Route of administration of plasmid DNA vaccines influences the strength and nature of immune responses in mice and non-human primates. However, the results in mice were not always predictive of those in monkeys and this is likely true for humans as well. Optimal dose and immunization schedule will most likely vary between species. It is not clear whether results in non-human primates will be predictive of results in humans, thus additional studies are required. http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00020/bibs /5n5p287. html

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1998

DNA immunization with minigenes: low frequency of memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes and inefficient antiviral protection are rectified by ubiquitination.

Our previous studies have shown that isolated cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL), B-cell, and T-helper epitopes, for which we coined the term minigenes, can be effective vaccines; when expressed from recombinant vaccinia viruses, these short immunogenic sequences confer protection against a variety of viruses and bacteria. In addition, we have previously demonstrated the utility of DNA immunization using plasmids encoding full-length viral proteins. Here we combine the two approaches and evaluate the effectiveness of minigenes in DNA immunization. We find that DNA immunization with isolated minigenes primes virus-specific memory CTL responses which, 4 days following virus challenge, appear similar in magnitude to those induced by vaccines known to be protective. Surprisingly, this vigorous CTL response fails to confer protection against a normally lethal virus challenge, although the CTL appear fully functional because, along with their high lytic activity, they are similar in affinity and cytokine secretion to CTL induced by virus infection. However this DNA immunization with isolated minigenes results in a low CTL precursor frequency; only 1 in approximately 40,000 T cells is epitope specific. In contrast, a plasmid encoding the same minigene sequences covalently attached to the cellular protein ubiquitin induces protective immunity and a sixfold-higher frequency of CTL precursors. Thus, we show that the most commonly employed criterion to evaluate CTL responses-the presence of lytic activity following secondary stimulation-does not invariably correlate with protection; instead, the better correlate of protection is the CTL precursor frequency. Recent observations indicate that certain effector functions are active in memory CTL and do not require prolonged stimulation. We suggest that these early effector functions of CTL, immediately following infection, are critical in controlling virus dissemination and in determining the outcome of the infection. Finally, we show that improved performance of the ubiquitinated minigenes most probably requires polyubiquitination of the fusion protein, suggesting that the enhancement results from more effective delivery of the minigene to the proteasome.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Manipulation of immune responses via particle-mediated polynucleotide vaccines.

Polynucleotide vaccines are a new approach to immunization that promises qualitative advances in vaccine technology. These vaccines mimic infection in that they result in expression of pathogen gene products in situ, which can elicit both cell-mediated immune responses and humoral responses. This approach has been applied primarily to vaccines against viral diseases, but may be significant for vaccines directed toward bacterial pathogens. Auragen has developed a generally applicable gene transfer technology and, for vaccine applications, has focused on particle-mediated gene transfer to epidermis. Results demonstrate that Accell polynucleotide vaccines induce immune responses toward human immunodefficiency virus (HIV) antigens, influenza A virus antigens, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) antigens in rodent,s swine and primates. Cellular immune responses toward these antigens have been demonstrated in rodents. In a swine influenza a challenge model Accell vaccination provides protection equivalent to that of a commercial killed-whole-virus vaccine. Vaccination of mice by this method toward a Chlamydia pneumoniae major outer-membrane protein elicits a species-specific antibody response.

AIDS Vaccines↗
PubMed1996

Particle-mediated nucleic acid immunization.

Nucleic acid immunization involves the direct in vivo administration of antigen-encoding plasmid DNA molecules that results in the de novo production of correctly folded microbial antigens at the site of DNA delivery. While this process can lead to the development of neutralizing antibody responses recognizing authentic protein conformations, in vivo antigen production also results in epitope presentation via the MHC class I antigen processing pathway, leading to the elicitation of cytotoxic cellular immune responses. Recent efforts in the authors' laboratories have focused on use of the Accell gene delivery system (gene gun) to achieve the direct, intracellular delivery of small quantities of DNA into cells of the epidermis. The gene gun approach to nucleic acid vaccination capitalizes on the synergistic combination of an effective DNA delivery system and a target tissue that serves as a major immunological inductive site. Experimental gene gun-based nucleic acid vaccines can achieve potent humoral and cytotoxic cellular immune responses in rodent models following immunization with as little as 16 ng of DNA. Equally strong responses have also been elicited in larger animals, such as pigs and monkeys, following epidermal immunization with as little as 2 to 4 micrograms of DNA.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Selected strategies to augment polynucleotide immunization.

We sought to amplify the immune response to polynucleotide immunization through co-delivery of complementary DNA (cDNA) encoding a cytokine or co-stimulatory molecule to enhance antigen presentation. In the context of intramuscular immunization, we examined co-delivery of cDNAs for B7-1 and human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) within separate plasmids or a dual plasmid with two independent expression cassettes. Intramuscular delivery of the dual expression plasmid produced anti-CEA antibody responses and antitumor effects superior to those generated by plasmid DNA encoding CEA alone. However, co-delivery of cDNAs encoding B7-1 and CEA in the form of two separate plasmids produced no augmentation. The importance of single plasmid delivery suggests the effectiveness of this strategy is contingent upon co-expression of B7-1 and CEA within the same cell. The success of cutaneous polynucleotide immunization by particle bombardment is thought to derive largely from the presence of Langerhans cells within the skin. We hypothesized that co-delivery of plasmid DNA encoding granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) by particle bombardment would enhance the antigen presenting capacity of Langerhans cells at the inoculation site similar to its effects in vitro. Augmentation of CEA-specific lymphoblastic transformation and antibody response was observed when plasmid GM-CSF (pGM-CSF) was administered 3 days prior to each dose of plasmid DNA encoding CEA. These strategies for augmentation of immune response to polynucleotide immunization should be applicable to a wide variety of antigenic targets including infectious agents and other tumor-associated antigens.

Animals↗