PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

J T Geitung

Publications and source records attributed to J T Geitung.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

[Written information from hospital to primary physician about discharged patients].

Discharge communications from hospitals to general practitioners in respect of 203 patients have been analyzed in two municipalities in Western Norway. The average interval between discharge from hospital and the first visit to the GP was 25 days (1-198 days). The mean period before arrival of the final report was 28 days (0-175 days). In 38% of the cases the GPs had received no written communication from the hospital upon first contact after discharge. 42% of the preliminary reports and 18% of the final reports were judged to be inadequate. At the first attendance, the GPs were uncertain about the drug regimen in 25% of the cases and about other forms of treatment in 32%. They felt uncertainty about follow-up procedures in the case of 44%. As evaluated by the GPs, in 22% of the cases the absence or inadequacy of the discharge letters might have had a negative influence on the patient's health. A survey of the literature provides a basis for the following recommendations: On leaving the hospital the patient should be given an interim discharge summary containing any information essential for immediate follow-up, to be delivered to the general practitioner by hand. The final discharge letter should focus upon topics of particular interest for the general practitioner: results from clinical examinations and laboratory investigations should be restricted to data necessary for making clinical decisions; treatment given in hospital, including adverse reactions, and drug regimen at discharge; any information on the nature and prognosis of the disease given to the patient and/or relatives during the stay in hospital; evaluation of prognosis and advice on sociomedical rehabilitation in everyday life and at work; a plan for future management of the patient with emphasis on well-defined sharing of tasks and responsibilities between the hospital, the outpatient department and the GP.

Medical Record Linkage

Ultrasonography versus urography as preoperative investigation prior to hysterectomy.

Ultrasonography (US) has been compared with urography (IVU) as a preoperative investigation prior to hysterectomy in 62 patients. In 38 patients the urinary tract was deemed normal by both US and IVU. US and IVU coincided in varying degrees of hydronephrosis in 8 patients and disagreed in one. Of 5 double ureters, US missed 2. IVU showed expansile lesions in 5 kidneys where US showed benign cysts. No severe contrast media reactions were observed. We recommend that preoperative urography should be replaced by preoperative ultrasonography when a screening examination of the upper urinary tract morphology is deemed necessary prior to hysterectomy.

Female

Continuing reject-repeat film analysis program.

A continuing image quality assurance and control program has been employed in the Department for over 9 years. One of the tools used in assessing quality has been reject-repeat analyses performed 9 times. The reject rate dropped from 15% in 1980-1981 to 8.4% in 1982. After moving to a new department with new film processing systems and, in part, new diagnostic equipment, the rejection rate increased to 13.2%. New and renewed procedures such as increased control and adjustment of technical equipment (in particular the automatic daylight film processing systems), information and education, decreased the rejection rates to 9.2 and 6.6% on 2 analysis occasions in 1987, and to 6.4% in 1988. Image quality assurance and control have to be continuous activities if they are to yield favourable and economically justifiable results.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Calculation of internal costs in a department of diagnostic radiology.

Even though high technology accounts for less than 1% of health care costs in industrialized countries, radiology is often blamed for their escalation. In a squeezed health care economy it is important to know the real cost of diagnostic radiological procedures in order to set priorities and realistic budgets, and to bill (actually or fictively) referring departments, physician's patients, insurance companies etc., and to demonstrate real costs of radiology for politicians and clinicians. The so-called Radiology Points used in the Nordic countries are in our opinion not adequate as basis for "price tags", even if to some extent they do reflect work and expenses involved in an examination. The real costs of ultrasonography (US) and excretory urography (UG) of the upper urinary tract have been compared in a study being performed to determine whether US can replace UG as the first examination in upper urinary tract disease. The cost of US is 53% (high osmolar contrast media) or 27% (anionic contrast media) of UG. If US can replace UG as the first examination in upper urinary tract disease the cost savings will be dramatic, especially if low osmolar or anionic contrast media are routinely used.

Cost-Benefit Analysis