PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

J T Radue

Publications and source records attributed to J T Radue.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Lateral preference in mastication: relation to pain.

Ten subjects performed deliberate right and left-sided chewing of gum, each exercise with a duration of 60 s, followed by maximum voluntary teeth clenching (MVC) until onset of pains in the masseter muscles (pain threshold). Contractile activities of the right and left masseter muscles were assessed by integrated and cumulative surface electromyography (EMG). When the right and left muscles functioned as chewing side muscles only, they generated practically identical levels of chewing force; the same applied when they functioned as non-chewing side muscles only. During identical functions, EMGs suggested identical motor unit recruitment and firing patterns in the two paired muscles; i.e., units producing relatively high tensions for chewing side activity, and other units producing relatively low tensions for non-chewing side activity. During isometric MVC activity, until onset of pains, the right and left muscles generated practically identical levels of bite force, but right and left motor unit activity patterns seemed to differ. Right and left motor units might have fired at different rates or begun to drop out at different times. In the latter case, rapidly before slowly fatigued units. There was a tendency for a low pain threshold with high chewing side activity in both masseter muscles. Motor units producing high levels of tension, but easily fatigued, might have caused early onset of muscle pains. No relationships could be established between preferred chewing side and side of initial muscle pains, nor between MVC activity and side of pain onset and preferred chewing side.

Adult

Lateral preference in mastication: a feasibility study.

To study lateral bolus placement during mastication, referred to as masticatory lateral preference, fifteen males and ten females chewed sugarless gum for 15, 20 and 25 s, and visual inspections were done of either right or left side bolus placements. In each of three series of observations, there were no significant differences between right or left side bolus placements. Three consecutive spot checks, in single subjects, showed that lateral preference occurred at random. However, information on a favoured chewing side predicted fairly reliably the side of observed masticatory lateral preference. Observed lateral preference could not be predicted from hand laterality. Consistent and predominant right or left lateral preference was, presumably, an expression of mainly motivational chewing behaviour.

Adult

Lateral preference in mastication: an electromyographic study.

To study concurrence of specific electromyographic chewing patterns and the side of mastication, twelve subjects chewed gum for 15, 20 and 25 s. Gum bolus placement on the right or left side of the dentition was estimated by three series of visual inspections. Contraction patterns of the chewing and non-chewing side masseter muscles were appraised by integrated and cumulative surface electromyography. Consistent and predominant gum bolus placement on the right side of the dentition could be predicted fairly reliably from comparative electromyographic observations. This was also the case in instances of consistent left-sided gum bolus placement, but not in predominant left-sided bolus placement. The latter phenomenon was explained by deviant observations made in two subjects only. Agreement between a presumed chewing side and a predictive contractility pattern was established in 78% of observations (P less than 0.001).

Adult