PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Thomas Heywood

Publications and source records attributed to J Thomas Heywood.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

The confounding issue of comorbid renal insufficiency.

The United States is currently beleaguered by twin epidemics, heart failure (HF) and renal insufficiency (RI). HF and RI frequently coexist in the same patient, and this conjunction, often called the "cardiorenal syndrome," has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. Approximately 60% to 80% of patients hospitalized for HF have at least stage III renal dysfunction as defined by the National Kidney Foundation (NKF), and this comorbid RI is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality risk. Numerous studies have demonstrated that in patients with HF, indices of renal function are the most powerful independent mortality risk predictors. Comorbid RI can result from both intrinsic renal disease and inadequate renal perfusion. Atherosclerosis, renal vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension are significant precursors of both HF and RI. Moreover, diminished renal perfusion is frequently a consequence of the hemodynamic changes associated with HF and its treatment. Both HF and RI stimulate neurohormonal activation, increasing both preload and afterload and reducing cardiac output. Inotropic agents augment this neurohormonal activation. In addition, diuretics can produce hypovolemia and intravenous vasodilators can cause hypotension, further diminishing renal perfusion. Management of these patients requires successfully negotiating the delicate balance between adequate volume reduction and worsening renal function. Despite this, few evidence-based data are available to guide management decisions, indicating a compelling need for additional studies in this patient population.

Acute Disease↗

High prevalence of clinically silent severe mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure: role for echocardiography.

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and has adverse effects on prognosis. In view of the altered hemodynamics in CHF, we examined the accuracy of auscultation for its detection in CHF with reduced systolic function. We examined 370 patients on stable heart failure therapy enrolled in our CHF clinic, if they had a physical examination by one of the two senior cardiologists and an echocardiogram within 2 weeks after the physical examination. The MR murmur was graded 0 to 6 on physical examination. MR was graded 0 to 4 on echocardiography using standard echocardiographic criteria. The left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was 21 +/- 12% and age was 65 +/- 15 years. By echocardiography MR was present in 345 patients (94%), being 1+ in 162 (44%), 2+ in 80 (22%), 3+ in 54 (15%), and 4+ in 51 (14%). The frequency of an audible MR murmur by physical examination was 4% in 1+ MR, 11% in 2+ MR, 13% in 3+ MR, and 37% in 4+ MR. The audibility of MR murmur was not related to age, sex, body size, LV size, ejection fraction, or left atrial size. In conclusion, grade 3 or 4+ MR is present in one third of patients with CHF and reduced ejection fraction, and is inaudible in three quarters of them by physical examination. Echocardiography is needed for its detection. Audibility of MR murmur cannot be predicted by body size, LV size, or LV function in these patients.

Aged↗

Adherence to heart failure quality-of-care indicators in US hospitals: analysis of the ADHERE Registry.

BACKGROUND: Quality-of-care indicators have been developed for patients hospitalized with heart failure. However, little is known about current rates of conformity with these indicators or their variability across hospitals. METHODS: Data from 81 142 admissions occurring between July 1, 2002, and December 31, 2003, at 223 academic and non-academic hospitals in the United States participating in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) were analyzed. Rates of conformity with the 4 Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations core performance measures--discharge instructions (HF-1), assessment of left ventricular function (HF-2), use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (HF-3), and smoking cessation counseling (HF-4)--as well as length of stay and in-hospital mortality rates were computed. RESULTS: Across all hospitals, the median rates of conformity with HF-1, HF-2, HF-3, and HF-4 were 24.0%, 86.2%, 72.0%, and 43.2%, respectively. Rates of conformity at individual hospitals varied from 0% to 100%, with statistically significant differences between academic and non-academic hospitals. Statistically significant positive independent predictors of overall conformity included the prevalence of comorbidities and the use of more intense pharmacologic management. Median hospital length of stay varied from 2.3 to 9.5 days, and in-hospital mortality varied from 0% to 11.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitals providing care for patients with heart failure, there is significant individual variability in conformity to quality-of-care indicators and clinical outcomes and a substantial gap in overall performance. Establishing educational initiatives and quality improvement systems to reduce this variability and eliminate this gap would be expected to substantially improve the care of these patients.

Aged↗

Strategies to reduce length of stay and costs associated with decompensated heart failure.

Heart failure (HF) is a major medical problem in the United States, imposing significant economic burden on the health care system. Despite therapeutic advances, HF-associated morbidity and mortality continue to increase. Compliance with therapeutic guidelines for the management of chronic HF is far from ideal, increasing the likelihood that patients will experience multiple episodes of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) during the course of HF disease. Prevention, streamlined inpatient care, effective vasoactive therapy, and initiation of proven long-term therapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers, are all targets for improvement. Because of the chronic nature of heart failure, a successful disease management program for ADHF must also include effective outpatient care.

Health Care Costs↗

Simple clinical criteria to determine the prognosis of heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether easily obtained clinical parameters serve as predictors of survival in patients with congestive heart failure. Several scoring systems to predict heart failure survival have been developed; however, many of these deal principally with transplant recipients or do not account for a patient's response to therapy. METHODS: A total of 680 patients with an ejection fraction of less than 40% were included in the analysis. Baseline assessments were performed and treatment regimens were identified; patients were then followed for up to 5 years. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to determine clinically important predictors of survival. Kaplan-Meier survival functions for patients with and without the prognostic variable were constructed and mortality was calculated at 1 year and 5 years. RESULTS: Ejection fraction improvement at 6 months, diabetes mellitus, age, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were significant predictors for survival in the univariate model. Ejection fraction improvement, age, and BUN were significant predictors in the multivariate model. These findings were used to construct a model for predicting patient mortality. Improved ejection fraction (>15 ejection fraction units) gave a 1-year mortality of 2% and a 5-year mortality of 11%. Mortality rates according to patient age and BUN levels were also calculated. CONCLUSION: Ejection fraction improvement was the most important predictor for survival in patients with systolic dysfunction; monitoring ejection fraction changes through repeat echocardiograms has important prognostic value. In patients without ejection fraction improvement, age and renal function are important survival determinants.

Adult↗

The cardiorenal syndrome: lessons from the ADHERE database and treatment options.

Significant renal dysfunction is common in patients hospitalized for heart failure and carries a grim prognosis. Patients with heart failure who have or develop renal dysfunction while being treated for heart failure are said to have the cardiorenal syndrome. The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) database, which enrolled nonselected patients admitted to the hospital for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), was used to determine the causes for this renal dysfunction and whether treatment can optimize outcomes. Results show that the average patient admitted for ADHF is older than those typically enrolled in clinical trials and has at least moderate kidney damage, with significantly impaired glomerular filtration rates. Renal dysfunction in patients with heart failure is complex and often multifactorial in origin, but the syndrome may be reversible in some patients. Reduction of angiotensin II levels with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may prevent glomerular hyperfiltration and ultimately preserve renal function; however, patients who are volume-depleted may be especially sensitive to ACE inhibitor-induced efferent arteriolar dilation, so ACE inhibitor therapy in patients with renal dysfunction should be initiated when the patient is volume replete. In conclusion, impaired renal function is common in heart failure patients and may be a key cause of the cascade involving fluid retention, decompensation, and eventual hospital admission. Future pharmacologic research should focus on therapies aimed at maintaining or improving renal function in heart failure patients to reduce the high mortality associated with the cardiorenal syndrome.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

Morbidity, mortality, physiologic and functional parameters in elderly and non-elderly patients in the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT).

BACKGROUND: The Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) demonstrated the favorable effects of the addition of valsartan to prescribed heart failure (HF) therapy on HF hospitalization, and functional and physiological parameters. As the prevalence of HF morbidity and mortality are increased in the elderly, the effect of valsartan in the elderly is of clinical significance. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis, morbidity, mortality, left ventricular (LV) size and function, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), aldosterone, norepinephrine (NE), quality of life, and treatment effect with valsartan were examined by subgroups of 2350 elderly (>or= 65 years) and 2660 non-elderly (< 65 years) patients enrolled in Val-HeFT. RESULTS: While the overall incidence of morbidity and mortality was higher in the elderly, valsartan produced beneficial effects in reducing risk of morbidity in the elderly by 11.8% (P = .07), and the non-elderly by 14.6% (P = .09). Valsartan had no effect on mortality compared to placebo in the non-elderly, 15.2% vs 15.0% (P = .87), and elderly, 25.1% vs 24.0%, (P = .64). Valsartan had statistically significant beneficial effects in both the elderly and non-elderly on LV size and function, BNP, aldosterone and quality of life. Beneficial effects on NE were also observed with valsartan in both subgroups with statistically significant reductions produced in the non-elderly. CONCLUSIONS: Val-HeFT demonstrated that elderly patients present with more advanced HF as evidenced by higher morbidity and mortality along with greater neurohormonal activation. In Val-HeFT, valsartan produced a consistent beneficial effect on morbidity, LV function and size, quality of life, and neurohormonal levels in both the elderly and non-elderly.

Adult↗

Effect of nesiritide on length of hospital stay in patients with decompensated heart failure.

We examined the effect of nesiritide, administered as initial therapy, on length of hospital stay (LOS) and renal function through a retrospective analysis of 129 consecutive admissions to the coronary care unit in 98 patients diagnosed with congestive heart failure. Nesiritide was infused during 58 admissions (nesiritide group) while other therapies, not including nesiritide, were used during 71 admissions (non-nesiritide group). Although the nesiritide group showed lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction and systolic blood pressure, higher serum creatinine, and a longer QRS interval, the LOS of this group was significantly shorter compared to the non-nesiritide group (3.91 +/- 1.3 vs 4.77 +/- 1.7 days, P = .0023). Both groups were similar with respect to body weight change (negative fluid balance), a slight decrease in blood urea nitrogen, and unchanged serum creatinine. Nesiritide as an initial therapy for treatment of congestive heart failure results in a more rapid hospital discharge without compromising renal function.

Aged↗

Amiodarone rescue therapy for severe decompensated heart failure initially unsuitable for beta-blockers.

BACKGROUND: Beta-blocker therapy is now standard therapy for patients with stable heart failure; however, fluid-overloaded, New York Heart Association Class IV patients tolerate beta-blockers poorly. Amiodarone, a drug with antiadrenergic effects, has been shown to improve survival for patients with heart rates of 90 beats per minute or greater. METHODS: We reviewed 26 patients with severe decompensated heart failure who were started on oral amiodarone for heart rate control. beta-Blocker titration was attempted when patients became clinically stable. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 48.5 +/- 17.5 years, and 73% were male. Fifteen patients were New York Heart Association Class IV, and 11 were Class III. Of these, 23 (88%) were fluid-overloaded, and 11 (42%) were on inotropic agents when amiodarone was started. The mean ejection fraction was 16.1 +/- 6%. The initial dose of amiodarone was 346 +/- 120 mg/day. Twenty (77%) patients were successfully started on beta-blockers. At follow-up prior to beta-blockers, 20 (77%) patients improved by at least one New York Heart Association class. Heart rate decreased from a mean of 98 +/- 15 to 78 +/- 13 beats per minute (P <.0001). Echocardiograms were available in 12 patients, with ejection fractions increasing from 16.1 +/- 8% to 26.8 +/- 13% (P =.004). CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone may be an effective rescue therapy for patients with decompensated heart failure and serve as a bridge to subsequent beta-blocker therapy.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Vasopeptidase inhibition with omapatrilat in chronic heart failure: acute and long-term hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the acute and long-term hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of the vasopeptidase inhibitor omapatrilat in human heart failure. BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition constitutes a major advance in the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF). Simultaneous inhibition of both neutral endopeptidase and ACE with omapatrilat may represent a new treatment strategy in CHF. METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-nine patients with symptomatic heart failure were randomized to double-blind treatment with omapatrilat (first 190 patients: 2.5 mg, 5 mg or 10 mg; last 179 patients: 2.5 mg, 20 mg or 40 mg once daily) for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Acutely, the 10 mg, 20 mg and 40 mg doses of omapatrilat produced greater reductions in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and systemic vascular resistance compared with 2.5 mg. Higher doses were associated with greater increases in vasodilator and natriuretic peptides, in addition to ACE inhibition. After 12 weeks, omapatrilat 20 mg and 40 mg showed greater falls from baseline in PCWP (40 mg: 0 h to 12 h average change -7.3 +/- 0.8 mm Hg) and SBP (40 mg: -11.7 +/- 1.7 mm Hg) than 2.5 mg (both p < 0.01 vs. 2.5 mg). The incidence of adverse experiences and patient withdrawal were similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: In CHF, the acute hemodynamic benefit seen with higher doses of omapatrilat was associated with increases in plasma vasodilator and natriuretic peptide levels in addition to ACE inhibition. After 12 weeks, the hemodynamic benefit was maintained. Omapatrilat may be a promising new agent in CHF.

Aged↗

Correlates of health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with advanced heart failure undergoing heart transplantation evaluation. The overall aim of the study was to determine whether patients' demographic characteristics, functional status, neuroticism, social network, social support, spirituality, and time since symptom onset are related to the physical and mental components of a patient's HRQOL. METHODS: A descriptive, correlational design was used. Patients (N = 61) were recruited from 2 university-affiliated, outpatient, heart failure programs. Data were collected from chart review, a 6-minute walk, and patient-completed instruments. HRQOL, including physical and mental health components, was assessed with use of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: Demographic characteristics, functional status, neuroticism, social network, social support, spirituality, and time since symptom onset explained 26% of the variability in the physical health component of HRQOL and 44% of the variability in the mental health component of HRQOL in patients with advanced heart failure. In analyzing the data for the most parsimonious model, New York Heart Association classification, 6-minute walk distance, and neuroticism explained 49% of the variability in the mental health component of HRQOL. CONCLUSIONS: New York Heart Association classification, 6-minute walk distance, and neuroticism are related to the mental health component of HRQOL and can be easily included in the assessment of patients with heart failure who are undergoing heart transplantation evaluation. The findings of the current study require replication but may be used to identify patients with heart failure who are potentially at risk for reduced HRQOL.

Activities of Daily Living↗