Biomedical subjects
J Toby
Publications and source records attributed to J Toby.
Content of a trainer's report for summative assessment in general practice: views of trainers.
BACKGROUND: Summative assessment of doctors completing general practice vocational training will become compulsory for those completing training after 1 September 1996. One component of the assessment will be a trainer's report. AIM: A study set out to consider the content of the trainer's report. It aimed to determine which elements of general practice general practitioner trainers believe are the most important for independent general practice; to seek the views of trainers as to the most appropriate methods for assessing these elements in summative assessment of general practitioner registrars; and to determine how frequently trainers have been sufficiently concerned about the performance of registrars to consider not signing the form denoting satisfactory completion of the training year. METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to 1296 general practitioner trainers in the United Kingdom. The main outcome measures used were: the percentage of respondents indicating that an element was very important/crucial for independent general practice; the percentage of respondents indicating a favoured method of assessment that did not include a trainer's report at all; and the proportion of trainers who had ever considered not signing the form denoting satisfactory completion of the training year. RESULTS: The response rate was 78%. Of 75 elements examined, 31 were considered important for independent general practice by 70% or more of respondents. For 29 of these 31 elements, fewer than 30% of respondents would choose a method of assessment that did not include a trainer's report at all. Twenty-six per cent of respondents had considered not signing the form denoting satisfactory completion of the training year, which represents a trainer considering not signing this form once every 29 years. CONCLUSION: These results provide a basis for the content of a structured trainer's report for summative assessment in general practice; such a report is likely to contain about 30 items. Data from the Joint Committee on Postgraduate Training for General Practice and the present study suggest that, for every form not signed, trainers considered not signing the forms of another 13 general practitioner registrars. This highlights the need for a report that will help trainers to make the difficult decision as to whether or not a registrar is ready for independent practice.
Consensus minimum standards for use in a trainer's report for summative assessment in general practice.
BACKGROUND: Summative assessment of general practitioner registrars is to be introduced in September 1996, one component of which will be a report by the trainer. Standards must be set and guidance provided as to the most appropriate ways of obtaining evidence for the trainer's assessment. AIM: The first aim of this study was to set consensus minimum standards for 30 items that are likely to form the content of a trainer's report; the second aim was to provide a consensus view on the most appropriate methods of assessment to be used by trainers. METHOD: A consensus conference was held in March 1995 during which the 30 items were discussed by a group of 30 general practitioners, of whom 27 were experienced trainers. This resulted in a draft document that was circulated to the conference attenders and other experts for consultation. RESULTS: Draft minimum standards were produced for all 30 items after the consensus conference with a mean of 2.5 standards for each item. Of those involved in the consultation exercise, 82% replied. Most of the revisions suggested at this stage were of a minor nature; the only major revision was to divide one item into two, resulting in a final total of 31 items. All but one of the 80 standards could be assessed by direct observation; 41 (51%) could be assessed by tutorial-based discussion and 61 (76%) by methods specific to that standard. Trainers or their practice partners were viewed as acceptable sources of evidence for all items and hospital consultants and primary health care team members were viewed as acceptable for just over half of the items. CONCLUSION: Standards for use by trainers when providing a general practitioner report for the summative assessment of registrars have been developed by consensus conference and have been subjected to review by consultation. Acceptable methods by which registrars could be assessed against these standards, and suitable personnel who could provide evidence, have also been suggested.
Developing an integrated nursing team approach.
Nursing Standard recently published a literature search that explored different models of integrated nursing and more traditional models of community nursing in primary care (Baileff 2000). Models of change for implementing integrated nursing were also examined. This article aims to explore the development of an integrated nursing team in a healthcare centre in Northampton.