PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J V Manjón

Publications and source records attributed to J V Manjón.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Accurate quantification methods to evaluate cervical cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis patients.

OBJECT: Automatic accurate measurement techniques are needed to increase reproducibility in the quantification of cervical cord area (CCA) with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the assessment of central nervous system (CNS) atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two segmentation methods were implemented: (1) spatial mean brightness level estimation (SMBLE), and (2) partial-volume modeling (PVM). These were evaluated with the inclusion of spinal cord inclination and/or partial-volume-effect corrections. An averaged manually segmented set was considered as reference. Thirty MR studies were used to compare the different methods. A set of 15 MS patients and 15 control subjects within a two-year longitudinal study were used to evaluate cord atrophy with the best method. Statistical evaluation was made by using an intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman comparisons. RESULTS: Partial-volume modeling with spinal cord inclination correction and partial-volume spinal-cord contour contribution estimation was the most accurate method. The longitudinal test showed a 4% decrease in CCA in MS patients with no significant reduction in control subjects. CONCLUSION: The automatic PVM cord-segmentation approach, taking into consideration the spinal-cord inclination and partial-volume treatment, provides reproducibility and increased accuracy in the evaluation of cord atrophy, allowing the monitoring of changes in MS patients.

Adolescent↗

Comparison of different injection forms in CT examination of the upper abdomen.

BACKGROUND: The optimal technique for administration of intravenous contrast medium in computed tomography (CT) remains controversial. Therefore, we analyzed the influence of variable-rate injection protocols. METHODS: A double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in 60 patients studied with the same helical CT contrast-enhanced protocol. Patients were randomly distributed into three groups: monophasic (123 mL at 2.5 mL/s), biphasic (123 mL, 60 mL at 1.5 mL/s and then 63 mL at 2.5 mL/s), and sigmoid (0.6 mL/s ending at 2.5 mL/s). Contrast-enhancement efficacy was evaluated by attenuation coefficient measurements. RESULTS: The monophasic injection protocol produced a statistically higher liver, inferior vena cava, and portal enhancement than did the low-high biphasic and sigmoid protocols. The biphasic protocol produced a statistically higher enhancement in the superior aorta. The enhancement obtained with the monophasic protocol was always higher than or equal to those obtained with the biphasic protocol in all measurement protocols except in the superior aorta and the aortic bifurcation. CONCLUSIONS: A monophasic injection produces better parenchymal and venous enhancement. When arterial enhancement is important, a low-high biphasic protocol can be used. A sigmoid protocol, with the parameters used in our series, is significantly less effective.

Contrast Media↗