PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Vennes

Publications and source records attributed to J Vennes.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

A randomized, controlled trial of transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring during ERCP.

BACKGROUND: Pulse oximetry, used to monitor oxygen saturation during endoscopy, does not directly measure hypoventilation. Study goals were to determine whether transcutaneous carbon dioxide (PtcCO(2)) monitoring during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) prevents severe hypoventilation and to assess the accuracy of clinical observation and pulse oximetry in detecting hypoventilation. METHODS: All patients received intensive clinical and electronic monitoring including pulse oximetry. Supplemental oxygen was administered for pulse oximetry < 90%. Patients were randomized to a treatment arm (group 1) where PtcCO(2) monitoring guided sedation or a control arm (group 2) where PtcCO(2) was recorded but unavailable for guiding sedation. RESULTS: Group 1 had significantly fewer episodes of severe carbon dioxide retention (rise in PtcCO(2) >/=40 mm Hg above baseline) than group 2 (0 of 199 versus 5 of 196, respectively, p = 0.03), as well a shorter mean duration of procedure discomfort (8.3% of procedure duration rated as "uncomfortable" versus 11.5%, p = 0.04). Correlations between clinical observation and objective measures of ventilation were poor: level of sedation versus PtcCO(2) (R = 0.3) or pulse oximetry (R = 0.06); slowest respiratory rate versus PtcCO(2) (R = 0.4) or pulse oximetry (R = -0.4). PtcCO(2) rises of greater than 20 mm Hg occurred without oxygen desaturation in 10.7% of patients receiving supplemental oxygen. CONCLUSIONS: Carbon dioxide retention during ERCP is not reliably detected by clinical observation or by pulse oximetry in patients receiving supplemental oxygen. The addition of PtcCO(2) monitoring prevents severe carbon dioxide retention more effectively than intensive clinical monitoring and pulse oximetry alone. The clinical relevancy of this observation needs to be determined in an appropriately designed outcome study.

Blood Gas Monitoring, Transcutaneous↗
PubMed1992

Assigning appropriateness ratings for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using two different approaches.

Methods that combine information in the medical literature with expert clinical judgment are needed to determine the appropriateness of use of a procedure. The purpose of this study is to better understand the reliability and construct validity of this process by comparing ratings of appropriateness for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy that were developed using different approaches by two independent groups. Both the RAND/UCLA Health Services Utilization Study (HSUS) and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) combined scientific data with expert physician judgment to rate the appropriateness of specific clinical indications for the use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. This study applies the ratings developed by each group to a nationally representative sample of 1,585 endoscopies performed on people 65 years of age and older in 1981. HSUS developed indications that could be used to rate all 1,585 procedures; ASGE indications were less comprehensive and applied to 70% (n = 1,115) of procedures. Of those rated by both groups, appropriateness category ratings agreed for 94% of the procedures. However, the procedures not rated by ASGE were unevenly distributed across HSUS appropriateness ratings. Twelve percent of procedures rated as appropriate by HSUS were not rated by ASGE, but 80% of procedures rated as equivocal by HSUS and 73% rated as inappropriate by HSUS were not rated by ASGE, for those procedures rated by both approaches there was good agreement; however, a more explicit and comprehensive method may be required if equivocal and inappropriate use of a procedure is to be identified.

Aged↗
PubMed1986

Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the surgical management of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Preoperative ERCP was performed on 39 patients treated surgically for pancreatic pseudocysts from 1970 to 1982 at the Minneapolis Veterans Administration Medical Center. ERCP-related sepsis was rare (4 percent of patients) and only occurred when surgery was delayed for more than 24 hours. The primary benefit of preoperative ERCP was to provide detailed information on pancreatic and biliary ductal anatomic characteristics other than those specifically related to the pancreatic pseudocyst. These data influenced the choice of operation in 49 percent of the patients. Specific preoperative surgical planning was facilitated and intraoperative pancreatography and cholangiography were obviated. Major postoperative complications occurred in 21 percent of the patients (0 percent mortality) but none were considered to be related to preoperative ERCP. ERCP before operation is a safe and important adjunct to surgical management of pancreatic pseudocysts. We strongly believe, however, that the interval from ERCP to surgery should not exceed 24 hours.

Alcoholism↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.

Despite its relative safety (in comparison with surgery), and undoubted role in many clinical circumstances, biliary sphincterotomy is the most dangerous procedure routinely performed by endoscopists. Complications occur in about 10% of patients; 2 to 3% have a prolonged hospital stay, with a risk of dying. This document is an attempt to provide guidelines for prevention and management of complications, based on a workshop of selected experts, and a comprehensive review of the literature. We emphasize particularly the importance of specialist training, disinfection, drainage, and collaboration with surgical colleagues.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗