PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J W Affleck

Publications and source records attributed to J W Affleck.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Rehabilitation status--dysfunction and treatment outcome in a psychiatric day hospital.

Two groups of patients representing the common objectives of Day Hospitals, namely steady progress and maintenance in the community, were studied. The Morningside Rehabilitation Scale was used to measure dependency, inactivity, isolation and the effects of current symptoms on the patient's life-style. Small but significant changes including in some cases crucial changes which involve working capacity were observed. There is discussion on the value of standardised measurement and the expression of results in terms of levels of functioning. The effect on multi-professional communication and on the possibilities of comparison and planning of services is discussed.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Rehabilitation status: a measure of medicosocial dysfunction.

The Edinburgh Rehabilitation Status Scale (ERSS) measures four dimensions in which changes may occur in the course of a disabling illness or during rehabilitation: independence; activity; social integration; and effects of symptoms on lifestyle. It provides a profile of measures, the scores of which can be summated to indicate the overall level of performance of individuals or groups. Studies of its inter-observer reliability and of its application in various disability groups indicate that the ERSS reliably defines the characteristics of individual patients and of groups. The scale can be used conveniently by professional staff working independently or by a multiprofessional rehabilitation team to assess status and changes in patients. It can also be used for measurement of the effectiveness of services and for purposes of research, teaching, and administration.

Activities of Daily Living↗

A comparison of scales for assessing rehabilitation patients.

Twenty-four chronic schizophrenic patients were assessed by the Morningside Rehabilitation Status Scale, the Krawiecka Scale, and the Social Adjustment Scale by Self-Report. Inter-rater correlations suggest that the MRSS can be used by a rater with little previous knowledge of the patient. Between-scale correlations suggest the three scales assess somewhat different dimensions. A standard approach to rehabilitation assessment is suggested.

Female↗

The Scottish survey of psychiatric rehabilitation and support services.

Rehabilitation and support services in psychiatric hospitals and general hospital psychiatric units serving two-thirds of the population of Scotland were reviewed. Although there are wide between-hospital differences, especially between rural and urban areas, the National Health Service in Scotland is making considerable efforts to provide staffing, accommodation, occupational activities, and support services for the long term mentally ill. Services provided by local authorities, with the exception of group homes, are seriously deficient. The total number of services provided by an individual hospital correlated highly with an assessment of its adequacy in providing such services in relation to other hospitals. A simple count of services may therefore be used to assess adequacy. There was also a correlation between the range of a hospital's services and numbers of misplaced new chronic in-patients.

Adolescent↗

The measurement of psychiatric rehabilitation status. A review of the needs and a new scale.

The recognition of rehabilitation as a special interest in psychiatry, and its practice by professional teams, raises the need for some uniformity in examining patient outcome. The features required in a scale designed for this purpose are considered and the Morningside Rehabilitation Status Scales, which have been prepared specifically for psychiatric rehabilitation, have their development and use described. They measure the dimensions of dependency, inactivity in occupation and leisure, social integration/isolation, and current symptoms and deviant behaviour. The measures can be expressed as a profile of the dimensions, with the total a measure of overall level of functioning; reliability has been established, and validity assessed. The scales are not difficult to apply when the patients are known to the staff using them. They should be useful to rehabilitation teams for defining the current status of patients, measuring changes produced by rehabilitation programmes, deciding areas where treatment or service deficits may exist which the team should be attempting to remedy, as well as for teaching purposes.

Dependency, Psychological↗

Experiment in managing sociopathic behaviour disorders.

A ward catering for both sexes admitted patients with aggressive suicidal, or otherwise disturbed behaviour for observation and treatment until decisions could be made about their long-term needs. Patients were referred from the police, special hospitals, and the courts and some were transferred from other wards in the hospital. A third of the first 100 patients were admitted for forensic reasons. Twelve inmates were discharged to long-term accommodation for disturbed patients. The ward was intended to provide fairly short-term accommodation, though no time limits were set, and it was run as a medium secure unit. The ward was run by 16-18 nurses with support from medical teams, occupational therapists, and clinical psychologists. It has secured its status as a special unit within the hospital and will continue with the active support of the hospital staff.

Adolescent↗

Long-term follow-up of schizophrenic patients in Edinburgh.

This study is a 12-year follow-up of 153 subjects diagnosed as suffering from schizophrenia or paranoid psychoses. They had their key discharge in the years 1959-61 and were first followed-up at 12 months after discharge (Renton et al. ((1963)). Important findings were that outcome was related to mental state on discharge and also to the factor of continued neuroleptic medication. At this second follow-up 12 years later the important issues that have emerged are the differences in outcome between men and women and the apparently high death rate for men. The outcome in term of work, re-admission to hospital and death was much worse for male subjects.

Adult↗