PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J W Grau

Publications and source records attributed to J W Grau.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Nociceptive plasticity inhibits adaptive learning in the spinal cord.

Spinal plasticity is known to play a role in central neurogenic pain. Over the last 100 years researchers have found that the spinal cord is also capable of supporting other forms of plasticity including several forms of learning. To study instrumental (response-outcome) learning in the spinal cord, we use a preparation in which spinally transected rats are given shock to the hind leg when the leg is extended. The spinal cord rapidly learns to hold the leg in a flexed position when given this controllable shock. However, if shock is independent of leg position (uncontrollable shock), subjects fail to learn. Uncontrollable shock also impairs future learning. As little as 6 min of uncontrollable shock to either the leg or the tail generates a learning deficit that lasts up to 48 h. Recent data suggest links between the learning deficit and the sensitization of pain circuits associated with inflammation or injury (central sensitization). Here, we explored whether central sensitization and the spinal learning deficit share pharmacological and behavioral features. Central sensitization enhances reactivity to mechanical stimulation (allodynia) and depends on the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR). The uncontrollable shock stimulus that generates a learning deficit produced a tactile allodynia (Exp. 1) and administration of the NMDAR antagonist MK-801 blocked induction of the learning deficit (Exp. 2). Finally, a treatment known to induce central sensitization, intradermal carrageenan, produced a spinal learning deficit (Exp. 3). The findings suggest that the induction of central sensitization inhibits selective response modifications.

Analysis of Variance↗

Monitoring recovery after injury: procedures for deriving the optimal test window.

Researchers studying the impact of treatments designed to facilitate recovery after neural injury face competing demands. On the one hand, because treatment effects often emerge slowly over days, and because researchers seek evidence of stable long-term effects, it is common practice to observe experimental subjects for many weeks after treatment. On the other hand, the cost of performing studies and the need to evaluate a multitude of alternative treatment procedures requires optimal efficiency, pushing researchers towards shorter test procedures. With these issues in mind, researchers have appeared to derive a test window based on previously published methodologies and inspection of their recovery curves, with testing terminated after the recovery curve reaches asymptote (approaches a slope of 0). An alternative procedure is introduced here that evaluates the stability of the data set over time. Using correlational techniques, researchers can determine whether (1) testing should be continued for additional days; or (2) equivalent statistical power can be achieved in fewer days. This provides a rational decision rule to help researchers balance competing demands. Applying these techniques to a procedure that evaluates the impact of acute treatments on recovery from spinal cord injury, it is shown that equal statistical power can be achieved in half the time, greatly increasing the efficiency with which alternative treatments can be evaluated.

Animals↗

Pain and negative affect: evidence the inverse benzodiazepine agonist DMCM inhibits pain and learning in rats.

RATIONALE: The anxiogenic DMCM, an inverse benzodiazepine agonist, was used to explore the relationship between negative affective states and pain. Past work suggests that the outcome obtained may depend on both the intensity of the affective state and the way in which pain is inferred. OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to test the impact of relatively low doses of DMCM on multiple measures of pain reactivity and learning. METHODS: In experiment 1, systemic injections of 0.00, 0.015, 0.06, and 0.25 mg/kg DMCM were administered before vocalization and tail movements were assessed in response to a gradually incremented shock and radiant heat stimulus. Experiment 2 tested the effects of DMCM on Pavlovian conditioning. DMCM-treated subjects experienced a context paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) and conditioned freezing was assessed the next day. RESULTS: Experiment 1 showed that DMCM inhibits both a spinal nociceptive reflex (tail-flick to heat) and a supraspinal measure of pain (vocalization to shock). Because these inhibitory effects could reflect a disruption in motor function, experiment 2 employed a remote test based on Pavlovian conditioning. A moderate dose of DMCM undermined learning, implying that the drug decreased the affective impact of the aversive US. CONCLUSIONS: DMCM induces hypoalgesia on a wide range of assays. Furthermore, pharmacologically inducing a negative affective state blocks Pavlovian fear conditioning. It is suggested that DMCM induces a state of panic and that this state inhibits pain.

Affect↗

Preserving and restoring behavioral potential within the spinal cord using an instrumental training paradigm.

We have shown that spinal cord neurons can support a simple form of instrumental learning. In a typical experiment, rats are spinalized at the second thoracic vertebra (T(2)) and given shock to one hindleg. One group (master) receives shock whenever the leg is extended. This response-contingent shock causes an increase in response duration that decreases net shock exposure. This instrumental learning is not observed in yoked controls that receive the same amount of shock independent of leg position (noncontingent shock). Interestingly, rats that have received noncontingent shock also fail to learn when they are subsequently exposed to response-contingent shock on either the ipsilateral or contralateral leg. Just 6 min of noncontingent nociceptive stimulation, applied to the leg or tail, undermines behavioral potential for up to 48 h. The present experiments explore whether a behavioral therapy can prevent and/or reverse this deficit. In experiment 1, spinalized rats received 30 min of training with contingent shock, noncontingent shock, or nothing prior to noncontingent tailshock. They were then tested with contingent shock to the contralateral hindleg. Rats that had received noncontingent shock alone failed to learn. Prior exposure to contingent shock had an immunizing effect that prevented the deficit. Experiment 2 examined whether training with contingent shock after noncontingent shock exposure would restore behavioral potential. To facilitate performance during contingent shock training, subjects were given an intrathecal injection of the opioid antagonist naltrexone, a drug treatment that temporarily blocks the expression of the behavioral deficit. Twenty-four hours later subjects were tested with contingent shock on either the ipsilateral or contralateral leg. We found that naltrexone combined with contingent shock therapy restored spinal cord function. Naltrexone alone had no effect. The results suggest that noncontingent nociceptive stimulation can undermine behavioral potential after spinal cord injury and that instrumental training can help preserve, and protect, spinal cord function.

Animals↗

Shock-induced hyperalgesia: IV. Generality.

Brief-moderate shock (3, 0.75 s, 1.0 mA) has opposite effects on different measures of pain, inducing antinociception on the tail-flick test while lowering vocalization thresholds to shock and heat (hyperalgesia) and enhancing fear conditioned by a gridshock unconditioned stimulus (US). This study examined the generality of shock-induced hyperalgesia under a range of conditions and explored parallels to sensitized startle. Reduced vocalization thresholds to shock and antinociception emerged at a similar shock intensity. Severe shocks (3, 25 s, 1.0 mA or 3, 2 s, 3.0 mA) lowered vocalization threshold to shock but increased vocalization and motor thresholds to heat and undermined fear conditioned by a gridshock or a startling tone US. All shock schedules facilitated startle, but only brief-moderate shock inflated fear conditioning. The findings suggest that brief-moderate shock enhances the affective impact of aversive stimuli, whereas severe shocks attenuate pain.

Affect↗

Shock-induced hyperalgesia: III. Role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and amygdaloid nuclei.

Rats exposed to a few moderately intense (1 mA) shocks subsequently exhibit lower vocalization thresholds to shock and thermal stimuli. They also exhibit facilitated learning in a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm. Together, these results suggest that shock exposure can enhance pain (hyperalgesia). The present study examined the role of the amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), 2 systems that have been implicated in the induction and maintenance of negative affective states. Experiment 1 showed that lesions of the central, but not the basolateral, amygdala eliminate shock-induced hyperalgesia as measured by a decrease in vocalization thresholds to shock. Experiment 2 revealed that central nucleus lesions also prevent shock-induced sensitization of the vocalization response to heat. Anterior, but not posterior, BNST lesions had a similar effect.

Amygdala↗

Shock-induced hyperalgesia: evidence forebrain systems play an essential role.

Exposure to a few moderately intense (1-mA) tailshocks has opposite effects on two measures of pain reactivity in rats. Tail-withdrawal to radiant heat is inhibited (antinociception) while vocalization thresholds are lowered (hyperalgesia) to both heat and shock (King et al., 1996). Prior work indicates that this hyperalgesia represents an unconditioned response and that it enhances the acquisition of both conditioned freezing and an avoidance response to thermal pain. The present experiments begin to explore the neural mechanisms that underlie hyperalgesia. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that hyperalgesia is eliminated by both decerebration and pentobarbital anesthesia. Lesions limited to the frontal pole had a similar effect (Experiment 3). Experiment 4 showed that lesioning the frontal pole also disrupted the acquisition of conditioned fear.

Animals↗

Shock-induced hyperalgesia: II. Role of the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray.

Exposure to 3 moderately intense (1-mA) tailshocks has been shown to lower vocalization thresholds to both heat and shock. Previous shock exposure also facilitates the acquisition of conditioned fear as measured by freezing. These observations suggest that shock induces hyperalgesia (enhanced pain). This study explored whether shock-induced hyperalgesia depends on neurons within rostral or caudal portions of the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray (dlPAG). Experiment 1 examined the impact of dlPAG lesions on the acquisition of conditioned fear. Sham-operated rats demonstrated enhanced acquisition after shock exposure; both rostral and caudal lesions eliminated this effect. Experiment 2 showed that tailshock lowered vocalization thresholds to heat in sham-operated but not lesioned subjects. These results suggest that the dlPAG plays a critical role in the production of shock-induced hyperalgesia.

Animals↗

Instrumental learning within the spinal cord: I. Behavioral properties.

Four experiments are reported that explore whether spinal neurons can support instrumental learning. During training, one group of spinal rats (master) received legshock whenever one hindlimb was extended. Another group (yoked) received legshock independent of leg position. Master, but not yoked, rats learned to maintain their leg in a flexed position, exhibiting progressively longer flexions as a function of training (Experiment 1). All subjects were then tested by applying controllable shock to the same leg (Experiment 2). Master rats reacquired the instrumental response more rapidly (positive transfer), whereas yoked rats failed to learn (a learned helplessness-like effect). Disrupting response-outcome contiguity by delaying the onset and offset of shock by 100 ms eliminated learning (Experiment 3). Experiment 4 showed that shock onset contributes more to learning than does shock offset.

Animals↗

Evidence for spinal conditioning in intact rats.

Prior work suggests that spinal systems are sensitive to the stimulus relationships that underlie Pavlovian conditioning. We studied this phenomenon in Sprague-Dawley rats by pairing a vibrotactile conditioned stimulus (CS) with a tailshock unconditioned stimulus (US). Experiment 1 showed that spinal rats exhibit differential conditioning, having longer tail-flick latencies on the tail-flick test during a CS that was paired with the US (conditioned antinociception). Experiment 2 showed that rats trained with the cord intact still exhibit differential conditioning after the cord is cut. This suggests that spinal learning contributes to behavioral plasticity in intact subjects.

Animals↗

Tail-flick test: II. The role of supraspinal systems and avoidance learning.

It is held that the tail-flick test of pain depends on a spinal reflex because a similar response is observed in spinally transected rats. But when subjects were manually held and a cool heat setting was used, supraspinal systems facilitated the response (Experiment 1). This effect did not depend on the rate at which the tail was heated (Experiment 2) but rather on the co-occurrence of visual, auditory, and tactile cues that predict impending pain (Experiments 3 and 4). Subjects rapidly learned to exhibit a tail movement during these co-occurring cues, and this avoidance response was instrumental in nature (Experiment 5). Optimal learning was observed when the visual signal was presented 8-12 s before a heat-elicited response is normally observed (Experiment 6), and a low dose of morphine inhibited the performance of the instrumental response (Experiment 7).

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Impact of shock on pain reactivity: II. Evidence for enhanced pain.

Shocked rats (Rattus norvegicus) often exhibit longer tail withdrawal latencies to radiant heat, which suggests that exposure to shock reduces pain. But at the same time, rats appear hyperreactive to shock, suggesting than pain is enhanced. Experiment 1 replicated these findings and showed that when tail movement was monitored, shocked rats were less responsive to heat and hyperreactive to shock even when the same behavioral criteria were used. When latency to vocalize was measured, shocked rats appeared hyperreactive to both test stimuli (Experiments 2 and 3). Prior exposure to shock also enhanced the acquisition of conditioned fear in a different context (Experiment 4) and the speed with which rats learned a response to avoid a thermal stimulus (Experiment 5). The results suggest that exposure to shock enhances pain.

Animals↗

Impact of shock on pain reactivity: III. The magnitude of hypoalgesia observed depends on test location.

Pain reactivity is often assessed in rodents by measuring the latency of tail withdrawal from radiant heat (the tail-flick test). Using this test, the authors show that the magnitude of antinociception observed in spinal rats depends on test location; antinociception is observed at, and distal to, where shock is applied, but not at more proximal sites (Experiments 1 & 2). Experiment 3 evaluates the generality of this observation by testing 3 other shock schedules that are known to elicit distinct forms of antinociception. In all but 1 case, the magnitude of antinociception varied as a function of test location. Experiment 4 shows that morphine also has a greater impact at distal test locations. Experiment 5 assessed the impact of tailshock on reactivity to radiant heat applied to the foot. Of the 5 distinct forms of shock-induced antinociception studied, only 2 produce a robust antinociception at this test location.

Animals↗

Mechanisms of Pavlovian conditioning: role of protection from habituation in spinal conditioning.

Conditioned antinociception can be established in spinal rats by pairing stimulation to one hind leg (the conditioned stimulus [CS]) with an intense tailshock (the unconditioned stimulus [US]). After this training, the paired CS (CS+) elicits greater antinociception on the tail-flick test than a CS that was explicitly unpaired (CS-). Five experiments are reported that suggest that this effect reflects protection from habituation. Experiment 1 showed that the CS (legshock) induces antinociception before training. Presenting the CS alone weakened (habituated) its antinociceptive impact (Experiment 2). Less habituation was observed when the CS was paired with the US (Experiment 3). Decreasing habituation to the CS- (by increasing the interval between trials) and facilitating habituation to the CS+ (by increasing the number of trials) effectively eliminated the CS+/CS- difference (Experiments 4 and 5).

Animals↗

Tail-flick test. I: Impact of a suprathreshold exposure to radiant heat on pain reactivity in rats.

Radiant heat applied to the tail elicits a vigorous tail-flick response in rats. This tail-flick reflex is frequently used to measure pain reactivity. Prior research has shown that a suprathreshold exposure to the radiant heat used to elicit this reflex causes a reduction in tail-flick latencies in pentobarbital anesthetized rats. Experiment 1 replicated this observation and showed that the effect is not due to a change in tail temperature. Experiment 2 showed that reduced latencies (hyperalgesia) are not observed if the spinal cord is transected prior to testing. Experiment 3 revealed that pentobarbital anesthesia is required to observe thermal-induced hyperalgesia, for this effect is not observed in awake subjects. Experiments 4 and 5 extended this observation by showing that awake rats also fail to exhibit hyperalgesia if others measures of pain reactivity are employed (shock-induced vocalization and motor reactivity). Implications of the results are discussed.

Animals↗

Impact of shock on pain reactivity: I. Whether hypo- or hyperalgesia is observed depends on how pain reactivity is tested.

Prior research has shown that exposure to shock can induce a decrease in pain reactivity (hypoalgesia). The present experiments show that, at the same time points that subjects are less responsive to radiant heat applied to the tail (the tail-flick test), tailshock elicits enhanced motor reactivity and vocalization. This enhanced responsiveness, or hyperalgesia, is observed with both magnitude (Experiment 1) and threshold (Experiment 2) measures and decays within 32 min (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 shows that the hyperalgesia decays irrespective of whether or not subjects remain in the shock context, which suggests that the loss of hyperalgesia does not reflect extinction of the context-shock association. Neither removing subjects from the shock context (Experiment 4) nor the presentation of a postshock distractor (Experiment 5) affected the hyperalgesia.

Animals↗

Latent inhibition, overshadowing, and blocking of a conditioned antinociceptive response in spinalized rats.

Prior research has shown that a conditioned antinociceptive response can be established in spinalized rats by pairing stimulation to one hind leg (the conditioned stimulus, or CS) with tailshock (the unconditioned stimulus, or US). This suggests that spinal mechanisms can support classical conditioning. It is well known that in intact subjects, classical conditioning is undermined by preexposure to the CS (latent inhibition) or the concurrent presentation of either a more salient CS (overshadowing) or one that has already been associated with the US (blocking). In the present paper we show that these manipulations have a similar impact on the acquisition of a conditioned antinociceptive response in spinalized rats. These findings imply that similar principles may govern the acquisition of a conditioned response across different levels of the nervous system.

Animals↗

Activation of the opioid and nonopioid hypoalgesic systems at the level of the brainstem and spinal cord: does a coulometric relation predict the emergence or form of environmentally induced hypoalgesia?

Prior research suggests that a coulometric relation (Intensity x Duration) determines whether an opioid or nonopioid hypoalgesic system is activated by afferent nociceptive information. Using a paradigm that generates a brainstem-mediated hypoalgesia on the tail-flick test, we found that a coulometric relation does not predict either the emergence or the form of shock-induced hypoalgesia in decerebrate rats. In fact, no evidence was obtained that the brainstem's opioid hypoalgesic system can be activated by ascending neurons. More severe shocks elicited hypoalgesia in spinalized rats. Although a coulometric relation did not predict the emergence of hypoalgesia in spinalized rats, shock severity did predict the form of the hypoalgesia; the least severe shocks elicited an opioid hypoalgesia, and the more severe shocks generated a nonopioid hypoalgesia. A similar pattern of data was observed in intact rats exposed to the least severe shock parameters.

Afferent Pathways↗