PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J W Heller

Publications and source records attributed to J W Heller.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.

This study was undertaken to examine the effects of chronic high-rate stimulation on the eighth nerve and cochlea. Fifty-four male pigmented guinea pigs were deafened and implanted with single ball electrodes in scala tympani. Four groups of animals received chronic electrical stimulation at a level of 5 microCol/cm2/ph for 1000 h as follows: Group A: 1000 Hz, 100 microseconds/ph duration, 100 microA peak; Group B: 250 Hz, 100 microseconds/ph duration, 100 microA peak; Group C: 2750 Hz, 36 microseconds/ph duration, 250 microA peak; Group D: 250 Hz, 400 microseconds/ph duration, 25 microA peak. Also, two control groups received 20 min stimulation during weekly electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) measurement (Group E) and about 5 s stimulation (Group F) during a brief eABR 3 day postimplantation and at perfusion. On Day 50, animals were perfused, midmodiolar sections cut and a quantitative assessment of spiral ganglion cells (SGC) performed. All stimulated subjects showed a similar decrease in eABR thresholds and dynamic range over time. No stimulation conditions induced pathology. All stimulation conditions enhanced survival of SGCs compared to unimplanted ears and implanted non-stimulated ears (Group F). There were no statistically significant differences in SGC survival between any stimulated groups, including Group E stimulated once a week. In conclusion, high-rate stimulation, under the conditions of this study, provides no additional risks and the same benefits to SGC survival as low-rate stimulation.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem and cochlear implants.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been contraindicated for users of cochlear implants because of the internal magnet and other possible interactions. Users of the Nucleus Mini-22 Cochlear Implant (CI) or the experimental Multichannel Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) may have other disorders that are best diagnosed by MRI. The CI and ABI were modified by replacing the internal magnet and integrated circuit lid with nonmagnetic material. Tests were conducted in a 1.5-T MRI machine. Safety tests for force, heating, induced current, unintentional implant output, and implant damage were conducted by using various phantom models. Image distortion was evaluated in two subjects with implants. The maximum force measured was 2,818 dynes. There was < 0.1 degree C temperature increase in the vicinity of the implant. The maximum induced charge was > or = 667 times less than the minimum charge for auditory stimulation. There was no unintentional output during MRI scans and no change in implant function after 10 repeated scans. Image distortion consisted primarily of darkening and was worst in the axial plane, where it extended 1-2 cm medially and inferiorly from the receiver/stimulator. Compatibility-test results were acceptable, with a large margin of safety. Image distortion is limited to darkening in the immediate vicinity of the implant.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Combined electrical and acoustical stimulation using a bimodal prosthesis.

A new device incorporating a cochlear implant speech processor and a speech-processing hearing aid for the unimplanted ear has been designed and tested with four severely hearing-impaired patients. The aim of the device is to provide a more acceptable and effective combination of electrical and acoustic signals to the two ears. When used monaurally, and binaurally in conjunction with the cochlear implant, the speech-processing hearing aid mean scores for open-set sentences, words, and consonants were as good as or better than the mean scores for the patients' own conventional hearing aids. Some patients improved much more than did others. Although not conclusive, these results are encouraging, especially as they were achieved with a laboratory prototype that did not allow the patients to become accustomed to the processor in everyday situations.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Screening tympanometry: criteria for medical referral.

Tympanograms were obtained from normal preschool and adult subjects with a prototype hand-held tympanometer to obtain normative values for four tympanometric variables: static admittance, equivalent ear canal volume, tympanometric peak pressure, and gradient. Effects of age group, sex, and pump speed (200 or 400 daPa/s) were determined. The results were incorporated into a four-part screening protocol (history, visual inspection, audiometry, and tympanometry) designed to reduce the excessive error rates associated with screening strategies that rely exclusively on tympanometry.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗