PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J W Milsom

Publications and source records attributed to J W Milsom.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery using GelPort.

BACKGROUND: An easily usable hand access device will optimize success in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS). The authors describe their initial series of HALS colorectal resections using GelPort to evaluate their current technique and results with this new device. METHODS: A retrospective study investigated 33 HALS colorectal procedures including total colectomy ( n = 16) and low anterior resection ( n = 10). All operative data, including intraoperative GelPort performance, were prospectively recorded and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: In this study, 3 (9.1%) of 33 HALS procedures were converted to open surgery, and 4 (13.3%) of 30 HALS procedures required minimal enlargement of incisions to facilitate extracorporeal procedures. The operative time was 263 +/- 85 min, and the blood loss was 282 +/- 148 ml. There were no device malfunctions. Three major complications (9.1%) and 7 minor wound infections (21%) were noted postoperatively. The mean hospital stay was 7.9 +/- 3.8 days. CONCLUSION: When performed with GelPort, HALS is safely and reliably applicable for various colorectal procedures.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis: a case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: There are no previous comparative studies of total abdominal colectomy by laparoscopic methods in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients requiring urgent colectomy. This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic colectomy in these patients compared with those undergoing conventional urgent colectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis were identified in a prospective registry. All patients underwent a total colectomy with creation of an end ileostomy and buried mucous fistula. No patient had fulminant disease (tachycardia, fever, marked leukocytosis, peritonitis), but all were failing to respond to medical treatment. Patients undergoing conventional total colectomy were matched for age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis, disease severity, and operative period. Median values (range) are listed. RESULTS: From 1997 to 1999, there were 19 laparoscopic and 29 matched conventional patients. There were no inadvertent colotomies or conversions in the laparoscopic group. Although there was no difference in operative blood loss in the laparoscopic group (100 (range, 50-700) ml) when compared with the conventional group (150 (range, 50-500) ml), the operative times were significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (210 (range, 150-270) vs. 120 (range, 60-180) minutes, P < 0.001). Bowel function returned more quickly in the laparoscopic group (1 (range, 1-3) vs. 2 (range, 1-4) days; P = 0.003) and the length of stay was shorter (4 (range, 3-13) vs. 6 (range, 4-24) days; P = 0.04). Complications occurred in three (16 percent) laparoscopic patients (2 wound infection and 1 ileus) and in seven (24 percent) conventional patients (3 wound infection, 3 deep venous thrombosis, 1 upper gastrointestinal bleed). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic total colectomy is feasible and safe in patients with acute nonfulminant colitis and may lead to a faster recovery than conventional resection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

CO2 pneumoperitoneum does not enhance tumor growth and metastasis: study of a rat cecal wall inoculation model.

INTRODUCTION: Although many studies have evaluated the effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on port site recurrence, little is known about its outcome on tumor growth and metastasis. The effect of pneumoperitoneum with carbon dioxide on cecal tumor growth and metastasis was compared with laparotomy using a rat colon cancer cell line. METHODS: Time Course Study: Fifty WF/BN F1 hybrid rats were inoculated with 2,000,000 WB2054M5 tumor cells into the cecal wall and explored two to ten weeks after injection. Main Study: 152 rats were randomly assigned either to 6-mmHg CO2 pneumoperitoneum (30 minutes) or 4-cm laparotomy (30 minutes) two weeks after tumor inoculation and were explored four weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Time Course Study: Thirty-seven (95 percent) of the surviving rats developed a cecal wall tumor, and there was progressive tumor growth and metastasis over the ten-week period. At six weeks, metastasis occurred to the liver in 25 percent, to the lung in 38 percent, and to the lymph node in 63 percent, and peritoneal seeding occurred in 38 percent; this time period was chosen for the main study. Main Study: At the time of treatment (2 weeks), 124 rats were eligible for randomization. One hundred two rats survived the six-week period (50 pneumoperitoneum, 52 laparotomy) and were killed. There were no differences between the CO2 pneumoperitoneum and laparotomy groups regarding cecal tumor growth (1.043 vs. 0.894 g) and metastases to the liver (32 vs. 37 percent), lung (34 vs. 17 percent), lymph node (84 vs. 77 percent), and wound or port (20 vs. 23 percent). CONCLUSIONS: A cecal wall inoculation model mimics the natural cascade of colon cancer growth and metastasis. CO2 pneumoperitoneum did not affect the tumor growth and metastasis to the liver and other organs when compared with laparotomy in this model.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Surgeons have been reluctant to apply laparoscopic techniques to Crohn's disease surgery because of concerns with evaluating and excising inflamed tissue using laparoscopic methods. Additionally in Crohn's disease surgery, laparoscopic techniques have not been demonstrated to have clear advantages over conventional ones. METHOD: We conducted a prospective, randomized trial in one surgical department comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional techniques in 60 patients (25 males), median age 34.4 (range, 10-60.1) years, undergoing elective ileocolic resection for refractory Crohn's disease. Postoperatively, all patients underwent measurement of pulmonary function tests every 12 hours, and were treated identically on a highly controlled protocol with regard to analgesic administration, feeding, and postoperative care. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients assigned to laparoscopic and 29 to the conventional group, all had isolated Crohn's disease of the terminal ileum plus or minus the cecum. Median length of the incision was 5 cm in the laparoscopic group and 12 cm in the conventional group. Overall recovery of 80 percent of forced expiratory volume (one second) and forced vital capacity was a median of 2.5 days for laparoscopic and 3.5 days for conventional (P = 0.03). There was no difference in the amount of morphine equivalents used between groups postoperatively. Flatus and first bowel movement returned a median of 3 and 4 days, respectively, after laparoscopic vs. 3.3 and 4 days, respectively, after conventional surgery (P = 0.21). Median length of stay was five (range, 4-30) days for laparoscopic, and six (range, 4-18) days for conventional surgery. Major complications occurred in one patient in each group. Minor complications occurred in four laparoscopic and eight conventional patients (P < 0.05). There were no deaths. Two laparoscopic patients were converted to conventional as a result of adhesions or inflammation. All patients recovered well and there were no clinical recurrences in the follow-up period (median, 20; range, 12-45 months). CONCLUSIONS: Within a single institution, single surgical team, prospective, randomized trial, laparoscopic techniques offered a faster recovery of pulmonary function, fewer complications, and shorter length of stay compared with conventional surgery for selected patients undergoing ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic surgery in Crohn's disease.

Laparoscopic surgeons attempting to treat Crohn's disease must have experience working with inflammatory bowel disease and advanced laparoscopic skills. Nonetheless, laparoscopy is dramatically changing all aspects of gastrointestinal surgery and inflammatory bowel disease, including Crohn's disease, is likely to benefit, as well. This article defines the role of laparoscopy in treating Crohn's disease and outlines surgical therapy.

Colectomy↗
PubMed2001

[Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis and colonic polyps].

With increasing experience, laparoscopic techniques have been applied even to extended colorectal operations as restorative proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. After initial medial transection of the three main vascular pedicles, the colon is dissected free laterally, from the sigmoid orally towards the ileum. The rectum is mobilized down to the pelvic floor. Over a Pfannenstiel incision, the bowel is extracted and the pouch is created. The anastomosis is completed in double-stapling technique. At two departments, 27 patients have been operated on. The median time of operation was 320 min (180-540). The median length of hospital stay was 8.1 days. There was no postoperative mortality. The complication rate was similar to conventional surgery at the same institutions. Three patients had to be re-operated on, two for ileal obstruction close to the pouch, one patient for bleeding from the pouch. In restorative proctocolectomy, laparoscopic techniques prove to be safely feasible. They have the potential to become an appealing alternative to open surgery.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2000

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation.

Laparoscopy has greatly influenced abdominal surgery. We hypothesize that the benefits of minimally invasive surgery are applicable to rectal cancer. A cadaver model of laparoscopic rectal resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) and autonomic nerve preservation was utilized to explore this hypothesis. The principles of TME were followed, including high vascular ligation, sharp mesorectal dissection, and identification and preservation of the autonomic pelvic nerves. After proving feasibility in the cadaver model, a clinical study was performed on patients with mid to low rectal cancers. We observed acceptable morbidity with this minimally invasive technique of rectal resection and TME. We conclude that there is growing evidence that laparoscopic methods can be applied to patients with rectal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy.

PURPOSE: A laparoscopic approach to restorative proctocolectomy is new and has not been compared recently with the traditional open procedure. By using prospectively gathered data, laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy procedures in mucosal ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis patients were compared by using a case-matched design. METHODS: Forty patients, composing 20 consecutive laparoscopic cases (13 mucosal ulcerative colitis, 7 familial adenomatous polyposis), were matched for age, gender, and body mass index with 20 open cases (13 mucosal ulcerative colitis, 7 familial adenomatous polyposis) performed during the same time period. Mucosal ulcerative colitis patients were also matched for severity of disease by using hemoglobin and albumin levels, whole blood count, and steroid dependency. A loop ileostomy was made in 12 of 13 laparoscopic mucosal ulcerative colitis patients, all open mucosal ulcerative colitis patients, and no familial adenomatous polyposis patients. RESULTS: The median age was 25 (range, 9-61) years. There were no intraoperative complications in either group and no conversions in the laparoscopic group. The operative times (median, range) were significantly longer in laparoscopic cases (330, 180-480 minutes) vs. open cases (230, 180-300 minutes), P < 0.001. Bowel function returned more quickly in laparoscopic cases (2, 1-8 days) vs. open cases (4, 1-13 days), P = 0.03; and the length of stay was shorter in laparoscopic cases (7, 4-14 days) vs. open cases (8, 6-17 days), P = 0.02. For diverted patients, the median length of stay was reduced by two days in laparoscopic cases (6, 4-14 days) vs. open cases (8, 6-17 days), P = 0.01. Complications occurred in 4 of 20 laparoscopic patients (3 obstruction/ileus and 1 pelvic abscess) and 5 of 20 open patients (2 obstruction and ileus, 1 each anastomotic leak and abscess, peptic ulceration, and episode of dehydration). CONCLUSIONS: Return of intestinal function and length of stay are reduced in the laparoscopic group compared with open group. A laparoscopic approach to restorative proctocolectomy has the potential of becoming an appealing alternative to conventional restorative proctocolectomy surgery.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2000

Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery for palliation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review our experience with laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery for palliative purposes and to assess its safety and efficacy. METHODS: This was a prospective analysis of 30 patients with incurable colorectal cancer considered for laparoscopic surgery for palliative purposes. RESULTS: Resection of a single segment of the bowel was performed in 15 patients (6 right and 1 left colectomies and 8 proctosigmoidectomies). One patient underwent both right colectomy and sigmoidectomy because of double lesions. Stoma creation only was performed in 11 patients (5 colostomies and 6 ileostomies). Three patients were converted to an open procedure. For resection, median operative time was 170 minutes, and median estimated blood loss was 150 ml. For stoma creation, median operative time was 60 minutes, and median blood loss was 50 ml. There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperative death occurred in two severely debilitated patients after stoma creation. One patient developed a pulmonary embolism eight days postoperatively, later dying of pulmonary failure. Another patient died six hours after loop colostomy. Autopsy was refused. There were no other postoperative complications. Median time to passage of flatus was two days and of stool five days after resection and two days for both flatus and stool after stoma creation. Median time to discharge was eight days after resection and seven days after stoma creation. All patients were able to eat and recover normal bowel function. Among the resection group, six patients died (median time to death, 12 months) during a median follow-up period of 13 months. Among the stoma creation group, five patients died (median time to death, 8 months) during median follow-up period of ten months. There were no port-site recurrences. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach for patients with incurable colorectal cancer can provide effective palliation with avoidance of a major laparotomy in the majority of cases.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Prospective, blinded comparison of laparoscopic ultrasonography vs. contrast-enhanced computerized tomography for liver assessment in patients undergoing colorectal carcinoma surgery.

PURPOSE: To prospectively and blindly compare intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography to preoperative contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in detecting liver lesions in colorectal cancer patients. Additionally, we compared conventional (open) intraoperative ultrasonography with bimanual liver palpation to contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in a subset of patients. METHODS: From December 1995 to March 1998, 77 consecutive patients underwent curative (n = 63) or palliative (n = 14) resections for colorectal cancer. All patients undergoing curative resections were randomized to either laparoscopic (n = 34) or conventional (n = 29) surgery after informed consent. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computerized tomography, diagnostic laparoscopy, and laparoscopic ultrasonography before resection. In those patients who had conventional procedures, intraoperative ultrasonography with bimanual liver palpation was also done. All laparoscopic ultrasonography and intraoperative ultrasonography evaluations were performed by one of two radiologists who were blinded to the CT results. All hepatic segments were scanned using a standardized method. The yield of each modality was calculated using the number of lesions identified by each imaging modality divided by the total number of lesions identified. RESULTS: In 43 of the 77 patients, both the laparoscopic ultrasonography and CT scan were negative for any liver lesions. In 34 patients, a total of 130 lesions were detected by laparoscopic ultrasonography, CT, or both. When compared with laparoscopic ultrasonography, intraoperative ultrasonography with bimanual liver palpation identified one additional metastatic lesion and no additional benign lesions. laparoscopic ultrasonography identified two patients with mets who had negative preoperative contrast-enhanced computerized tomography. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ultrasonography of the liver at the time of primary resection of colorectal cancer yields more lesions than preoperative contrast-enhanced computerized tomography and should be considered for routine use during laparoscopic oncologic colorectal surgery.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Comparison of intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) ciprofloxacin plus IV metronidazole (CIP+MET) with that of IV piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZO) in adults with complicated intraabdominal infections, and to compare the efficacy of sequential IV-to-oral CIP+MET therapy with that of the IV CIP-only regimen. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment of intraabdominal infections remains a challenge, mainly because of their polymicrobial etiology and attendant death and complications. Antimicrobial regimens using sequential IV-to-oral therapy may reduce the length of hospital stay. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial involving 459 patients, clinically improved IV-treated patients were switched to oral therapy after 48 hours. Overall clinical response was the primary efficacy measurement. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients (151 CIP+MET, 131 PIP/TAZO) were valid for efficacy. Of these patients, 64% CIP+MET and 57% PIP/TAZO patients were considered candidates for oral therapy. Patients had a mean APACHE II score of 9.6. The most common diagnoses were appendicitis (33%), other intraabdominal infection (29%), and abscess (25%). Overall clinical resolution rates were statistically superior for CIP+MET (74%) compared with PIP/TAZO (63%). Corresponding rates in the subgroup suitable for oral therapy were 85% for CIP+MET and 70% for PIP/TAZO. Postsurgical wound infection rates were significantly lower in CIP+MET (11%) versus PIP/TAZO patients (19%). Mean length of stay was 14 days for CIP+MET and 17 days for PIP/TAZO patients. CONCLUSION: CIP+MET, initially administered IV and followed by CIP+MET oral therapy, was clinically more effective than IV PIP/TAZO for the treatment of patients with complicated intraabdominal infections.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2000

Laparoscopic colectomy for malignancy.

It is clear from published series that laparoscopic colectomy for cancer can be performed safely by experienced surgeons, but there is a considerable learning curve for the procedure. Although surgeons have shown that an equivalent resection can be performed, it is not clear yet that this translates into equivalent recurrence and survival rates. Most of the expected benefits of minimal access surgery are being provided by laparoscopic colectomy, although these benefits have not been as readily achievable as those seen with other procedures. Even the early results of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer are encouraging, although the fate of this procedure rests with the long-term analysis of a number of trials currently underway. Laparoscopic techniques are continuing to evolve and improve secondary not only to technological breakthroughs but also advances in basic science and clinical research. This article provides technical descriptions to illustrate key concepts in laparoscopic resection of the right colon and rectosigmoid for cancer and reviews the results of recent prospective randomized trials.

Colectomy↗
PubMed1999

Laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum.

The use of laparoscopic techniques in benign colorectal surgery has expanded over the past several years, but controversy continues to surround the use of laparoscopic resection in cases of colorectal carcinoma. Diagnostic laparoscopy, the creation of stomas, and limited resections are becoming reasonable indications for benign diseases. In cases of malignancy, resection through a conventional incision or a laparoscope must adhere to the same defined surgical oncologic principles. Current randomized trials comparing open resection to laparoscopic resection should address these concerns. Port-site recurrence remains a leading concern regarding the widespread acceptance of laparoscopic resection for colorectal carcinoma. This article focuses on the applications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for malignant diseases. Further research in this area combined with advances in laparoscopic technology will be critical to the future successful application of laparoscopic surgery to colorectal carcinoma.

Colon↗
PubMed1999

Successful treatment of rectal prolapse by laparoscopic suture rectopexy.

BACKGROUND: A wide variety of procedures are used for management of rectal prolapse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of laparoscopic suture rectopexy in the treatment of this condition. METHODS: From May 1991 to May 1998, 32 consecutive patients were treated by laparoscopic suture rectopexy. In four of them, an additional sigmoid colectomy was performed for refractory constipation or redundant large bowels. The clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: Of our 32 patients, 27 were female and five were male. The median age was 51.5 years (range, 20-87). The median operative time was 150 min (range, 90-300), and the median hospital stay was 5 days (range, 2-20). There were no operative mortalities. Three postoperative complications required reoperations for bowel obstructions. At a median follow-up of 33 months (range 3-78), there were two complete recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience indicates that laparoscopic suture rectopexy, with and without sigmoid colectomy, is safe, feasible, and effective for the treatment of rectal prolapse.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Laparoscopic management of colorectal endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: In the past, intestinal endometriosis diagnosed at laparoscopy has generally required conversion to conventional surgery. The purpose of this study was to describe the laparoscopic management of colorectal endometriosis at a tertiary referral center. METHODS: From November 1994 to March 1998, 509 consecutive patients with endometriosis requiring laparoscopic intervention were prospectively evaluated. Those with colorectal involvement were analyzed for stage of disease, procedure, operative time, conversion rate, length of hospitalization, and complications. RESULTS: In 30 of the 509 patients (5.9%), colorectal involvement was identified. Twenty-eight of these 30 had stage IV disease. Intestinal involvement was suspected preoperatively in 13 of 30. Twelve required superficial excision of colon or rectal endometriomas. Protectomy/proctosigmoidectomy was done in seven cases, and rectal disc excision was performed in five patients. Four cases required conversion due to the overall severity of the pelvic disease. For those who did (n = 12) and did not (n = 18) require full-thickness excisions/resections, the median operative time was 180 min (range, 90-390) and 110 min (range, 45-355), respectively; the median length of hospitalization was 4 days (range, 3-7) and 1 day (range, 0-4), respectively. A major complication occurred in one patient (colovaginal fistula). At a median follow-up of 10 months (range 1-32), 28 patients were improved, and 24 of these had near or total resolution of preoperative symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive pelvic endometriosis generally requires rectal disc excision or bowel resection. In our experience, laparoscopic treatment of colorectal endometriosis, even in advanced stages, is safe, feasible, and effective in nearly all patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Vasopressin selectively increases 5-fluorouracil uptake by colorectal liver metastases following hepatic artery bolus infusion.

BACKGROUND: Poor drug uptake secondary to the hypovascularity of colorectal liver metastases may partially explain their limited response to hepatic artery chemotherapy. Vasoconstrictors can increase tumor perfusion but their effect on drug uptake has not been well-characterized. The aim of this study was to determine whether vasopressin could selectively increase tumor uptake of 5-FU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A syngeneic rat model of colorectal liver metastases was used. Control group rats underwent a 60-s hepatic artery infusion of 14C-5-FU (30 mCi/150 microL). Treatment group rats had vasopressin (60 mIU/kg, dose determined in pilot study) added to the 14C-5-FU infusion. Mean systemic arterial pressure was minimally affected. Tumor:liver (T/L UR) and tumor center:periphery (C/P UR) 5-FU uptake ratios were determined using quantitative autoradiography techniques. Differences in tumor size (< or > 4 mm) and location (superficial vs deep) were accounted for. Statistical analysis was by repeated measures ANOVA (P = 0.01 significant). RESULTS: A total of 161 tumors in 18 rats was analyzed. T/L URs were significantly higher in the treatment group compared to controls for tumors <4 mm (1.72 +/- 0.14 vs 0.70 +/- 0.16, P <0.001), tumors >4 mm (0.99 +/- 0.15 vs 0.45 +/- 0.16, P = 0.01), deep tumors (1.17 +/- 0.13 vs 0.68 +/- 0.15, P = 0.01), and superficial tumors (1.54 +/- 0. 15 vs 0.47 +/- 0.17, P <0.001). C/P URs did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that vasopressin selectively enhances the uptake of 5-FU by colorectal liver metastases in a rat model of hepatic artery infusion. This may represent a promising strategy for improving tumor response rates and patient survival.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Does laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery increase exfoliated cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer?

PURPOSE: Traumatic manipulation of cancer specimens during laparoscopic colectomy may increase exfoliation of malignant cells into the peritoneal cavity, causing an early occurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosis or port-sites recurrence. Because of this concern, the routine use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer was suggested recently. We assessed if laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery increases exfoliated malignant cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized fashion, 38 colorectal cancer patients undergoing an elective, curative operation were assigned to either a conventional or laparoscopic procedure between June 1996 and May 1997. In either group (n = 19), after the abdominal cavity was entered, saline was instilled into the peritoneal cavity, and the fluid was collected (Specimen 1). During surgery, all irrigating fluids were collected (Specimen 2). Both specimens were assessed for malignancy using four techniques: filtration process (ThinPrep), smear, cell block, and immunochemistry using Ber-EP4. The change in the amount of tumor cells in both specimens was compared between surgical groups. A pilot study was performed to validate the proposed cytologic method. RESULTS: In the pilot study of 20 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer, postresectional peritoneal cytology was positive in six patients, including two Stage II (T3, N0, M0) patients. The pilot study also validated that our semiquantitative scoring system can be reliably used to assess the amount of free peritoneal cancer cells. In the main study, 16 right colectomies, 3 extended right colectomies, 17 proctosigmoidectomies, and 1 left colectomy were performed. The T and N stages were T1 (n = 13, T2 (n = 5), T3 (n = 8), T4 (n = 11); N0 (n =22), N1 (n = 8), N2 (n = 7). Malignant cells were not detected in any Specimens 1 or, more importantly, in Specimens 2 in either surgical group. CONCLUSION: When performed according to strict oncologic surgical principles, laparoscopic techniques in curative colorectal cancer surgery did not have an increased risk of intraperitoneal cancer cell spillage, compared with conventional techniques. We hope that these results can decrease some of the concerns about tumor cell spillage and seeding during laparoscopy.

Adult↗