PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J W Reinhardt

Publications and source records attributed to J W Reinhardt.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1981

The effect of dental amalgams on mercury levels in expired air.

The expired air of a group of 48 persons, 40 with and eight without dental amalgam restorations, was analyzed for its mercury content before and after chewing. Expired air samples were collected in polyethylene bags, and a known quantity of each was pumped into the mercury detector for measurement. The results showed that examined subjects with dental amalgams had higher pre-chewing mercury levels in their expired air than those without amalgams. After chewing, these levels were increased an average of 15.6-fold in the former and remained unchanged in the latter group. It was concluded that in situ dental amalgams can increase the level of mercury in expired air.

Dental Amalgam↗
PubMed1979

Acid etch bonded cast orthodontic retainers.

We have described a technique which involves the use of a cast orthodontic retaining appliance bonded by the acid etch technique and composite resin for semipermanent retention. The technique provides an alternative form of treatment which offers some unique advantages over previous retentive techniques.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed1979

Comparison of the retentive strength of two cast gold pin techniques.

The retention contributed by the use of pins with gold castings can be substantially increased by the technique of placing a threaded pin in the dentin and making a casting with a threaded receptacle to fit the pin. The basis for the improvement is the greater retention of threaded pins to dentin compared to that of smooth, cemented pins that are part of the casting. The limitation on the retention achieved with the new technique is the cohesive strength of the cement. Zinc phosphate cement provided the highest retention, and EBA and polycarboxylate cements provided lower and similar retention when threaded pins were cemented to threaded receptacles.

Cementation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations.

This study measured deformation of cusps and gap formation associated with MOD resin composite restorations in maxillary premolars with and without the use of low elastic modulus liners. Low elastic modulus liners may reduce the deformation by absorbing polymerization shrinkage stress. Forty maxillary premolars were mounted in stone and slot MOD cavities were prepared. Teeth were randomized into four groups. In Group A, cavities were etched, Single Bond was applied and the cavities were restored with Z-100 composite. In Group B, the same was done except that a layer of flowable composite (Revolution) was place and cured after the bonding agent. In Group C, the same steps were followed as Group A but a layer of glass ionomer (Vitrebond) was placed and cured before the bonding agent. In Group D, a thin layer of composite was placed (after the bonding agent) as a base and cured and the cavities were filled. The distance between indexed cusp tips was measured before the restorations were finished and five minutes and 24 hours after the restorations were completed. The samples were then sectioned mesiodistally and epoxy resin replicas were made and prepared for SEM evaluation of gap formation. The mean contraction of the cusps in microm at 5 minutes and 24 hours, respectively, for each group was A) 47 and 30, B) 35 and 21, C) 23 and 8 and D) 40 and 28. Groups A and D resulted in the highest deformation, B was intermediate and C was the lowest. There was no statistically significant difference in gap formation between the groups.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of retention grooves on fracture strength of Class 2 composite resin and amalgam restorations.

The effect of approximal retention grooves on fracture strengths of class 2 composite resin and amalgam restorations was tested in vitro. Results indicated that retention grooves significantly improved (P less than 0.05) the compressive strength of amalgam restorations (38.6% stronger). For posterior composite resin restorations, there was no significant difference in mean compressive strength of restorations in preparations with and without retention grooves.

Composite Resins↗