PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J W Watt

Publications and source records attributed to J W Watt.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Bilateral extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in a spinal cord injury patient with a cardiac pacemaker.

OBJECTIVES: To review the precautions to be observed before and during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients with a cardiac pacemaker and the safety of bilateral ESWL performed on the same day. DESIGN: A case report of bilateral ESWL in a SCI patient with a permanent cardiac pacemaker. SETTING: The Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, the Lithotripsy Unit, the Royal Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, and the Department of Cardiology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK. SUBJECT: A 43-year-old male sustained a T-4 fracture and developed paraplegia with a sensory level at T-2. During the post-injury period, he developed episodes of asystole requiring implantation of a dual chamber (DDD) permanent pacemaker. Twenty-one months later, he developed a right ureteric calculus with hydronephrosis. A radio-opaque shadow was seen in the left kidney with no hydronephrosis. During right ureteric stenting, the ureteric stone was pushed into the renal pelvis. 1,500 shock waves were delivered to this stone on the right side, followed by ESWL to the left intra-renal stone with 1250 shock waves. RESULTS: The patient tolerated ESWL to both kidneys. The pacemaker was reprogrammed to a single chamber ventricular pacing mode at 30 beats per minute with a reduced sensitivity during lithotripsy. There were no untoward cardiac events during or after lithotripsy. The serum creatinine was 45 micromol/l before lithotripsy and 44 micromol/l two weeks after ESWL. CONCLUSION: SCI patients with a cardiac pacemaker may be able to undergo extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy following temporary reprogramming of the pacemaker. Bilateral, simultaneous ESWL is safe in the vast majority of patients provided that there is no risk of simultaneous ureteric obstruction by stone fragments. However, it should be remembered that a decrease in renal function could occur following bilateral ESWL of renal calculi.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Respiratory alkalosis and associated electrolytes in long-term ventilator dependent persons with tetraplegia.

STUDY DESIGN: A pilot case control study of the acid-base and electrolyte status in 30 long-term ventilator-dependent (LTVD) and 30 self ventilating persons with tetraplegia. OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent of respiratory alkalosis and screen for associated hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia and/or hypophosphataemia. SETTING: Medically stable persons with tetraplegia under the long-term care of the Southport Spinal Injuries Centre, England. METHODS: Blood gases and electrolytes were sampled from 30 control patients with tetraplegia and from 30 patients having been LTVD for more than 12 months. RESULTS: All the blood gas measurements in the LTVD group lay outside both the reference range and the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the control group: pH 7.46 (0.06); PCO(2) 3.46 (1.1) kPa; bicarbonate 18.3 (3.8) and base excess -3.2 (2.8) mmol/l; PO(2) 13.8 (2.8) kPa (means and standard deviations). The serum potassium, magnesium, phosphate, and sodium means lay within the reference ranges but the potassium, phosphate and calcium were at or below the 95% CI of the control values. One patient on part-time ventilatory support having less bicarbonate compensation had low serum electrolytes during ventilation. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of biochemical jeopardy from long-term mechanical hyperventilation although acutely administered hyperventilation has the potential to cause falls in serum potassium, magnesium and phosphate and so caution should be exercised in part-time ventilated persons. The full range of electrolytes should be assayed during stabilisation in LTVD and periodically thereafter. Hyperventilation helps to maintain good oxygenation in LTVD persons with paralysis and normal lungs. SPONSORSHIP: None.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Community-care waiting list for persons with spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVES: To disseminate the concept of community care waiting lists for spinal cord injury (SCI) patients with particular reference to carer support for management of neuropathic bladder by a regime of intermittent catheterisation. METHODOLOGY: The surgical waiting list focuses only on operative procedures, and ignores the wider requirements for ensuring satisfactory rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injury in the community. A community-care waiting list for individuals with spinal cord injury should include the following aspects of community care: (1) Home adaptation; (2) Provision of appropriate mobility needs (including wheelchair and cushion); (3) Equipment for comfortable living (including provision of hoist, pressure relieving mattress); (4) Psychological support for spinal cord injury patients and their partners; (5) Nursing home or residential care placement where appropriate; (6) Carer support for global management of complex needs associated with spinal cord injury (eg neuropathic bladder and bowel). RESULTS: Whereas full physical adaptation of the home can wait for some time after discharge, carer support for intermittent catheterisation is required from the first day after discharge from a spinal unit. Lack of such support means that some SCI patients are discharged with long-term indwelling urinary catheters, even though clean intermittent catheterisation is known to be the safest regime for managing the neuropathic bladder. Therefore, the absence of a community care waiting list means that best practice cannot be achieved for some tetraplegic subjects. CONCLUSION: We believe that a community care waiting list for bladder management will help to provide optimum care for neuropathic bladder and, hopefully, reduce the complications related to long-term indwelling catheters in spinal cord injury patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Doctor-patient communication: do people with spinal cord injury wish to receive written information about their medical condition from the physicians after an outpatient visit or after a readmission in the spinal unit?

STUDY DESIGN: A survey of spinal cord injury patients attending a follow-up clinic in a Regional Spinal Injuries Centre. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether spinal cord injury patients wish to receive written information about any changes in their medical condition after an outpatient visit or, following readmission in a spinal unit. SETTING: Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, United Kingdom. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed to assess the following: (1) Whether spinal cord injury patients wished to receive written information about changes in their medical condition after an outpatient visit or following readmission in a spinal unit; and (2) Whether provision of such written information would cause needless anxiety to patients and/or their relatives/carers. RESULTS: A total of 128 adults with spinal cord injury filled in this questionnaire. One hundred and six persons (83%) wished to receive written information about any changes in their medical condition after an outpatient visit, whereas eight (6%) felt that provision of such written information was not required. 115 individuals with spinal cord injury (90%) preferred to receive a copy of the MRI scan report, with interpretation of the findings, while 11 (9%) would be happy not to receive such information. 115 persons with spinal cord injury (90%) felt that written information about their medical condition would be valuable for showing to a locum General Practitioner (GP), if necessary, who may not be acquainted with their medical status. Only eight (6%) did not perceive a need for written information to appraise a locum GP. One hundred and twenty-two persons with spinal cord injury (95%) did not feel that provision of written information would cause needless anxiety to them; only four (3%) felt the other way. One hundred and nineteen (93%) individuals with spinal cord injury wished to receive written information about changes in their medical condition after a readmission to the spinal unit, while six (5%) did not wish to receive such information. CONCLUSION: Although the vast majority of people with spinal cord injury reported they wished to receive written information, a small proportion of patients did not wish to receive such information. Acceptance of written information is not universal and clinicians must ensure that provision of written information to people with spinal cord injury should be tailored to the needs of individual patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Dosage of once-daily gentamicin in spinal cord injury patients.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), serum creatinine does not accurately reflect the level of renal function. Therefore, in SCI patients, the dose of potentially nephrotoxic drugs should be adjusted on an individual basis from the estimated creatinine clearance. CASE REPORT: A 41-year-old male with tetraplegia due to cervical spinal cord injury underwent extended pyelolithotomy for staghorn calculus in the right kidney. The blood urea level was 9.9 mmol/l; creatinine was 112 umol/l (reference range: 0-135). We were conscious of this patient's renal disease, and therefore, administered only 3 mg/kg of gentamicin (240 mg) instead of the standard dose of 5 mg/kg body weight. Despite taking this precaution, the gentamicin level measured 22.5 h after the initial dose, was in the potentially toxic range 3.3 mg/l. CONCLUSION: We recommend that even the first dose of gentamicin in the once-daily regimen, which is 5 mg/kg, should be individualised in SCI patients based on age, sex, weight, height, level of spinal cord injury, and renal function.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Silent hydronephrosis/pyonephrosis due to upper urinary tract calculi in spinal cord injury patients.

STUDY DESIGN: A study of four patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) in whom a diagnosis of hydronephrosis or pyonephrosis was delayed since these patients did not manifest the traditional signs and symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To learn from these cases as to what steps should be taken to prevent any delay in the diagnosis and treatment of hydronephrosis/pyonephrosis in SCI patients. SETTING: Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, UK. METHODS: A retrospective review of cases of hydronephrosis or pyonephrosis due to renal/ ureteric calculus in SCI patients between 1994 and 1999, in whom there was a delay in diagnosis. RESULTS: A T-5 paraplegic patient had two episodes of urinary tract infection (UTI) which were successfully treated with antibiotics. When he developed UTI again, an intravenous urography (IVU) was performed. The IVU revealed a non-visualised kidney and a renal pelvic calculus. In a T-6 paraplegic patient, the classical symptom of flank pain was absent, and the symptoms of sweating and increased spasms were attributed to a syrinx. A routine IVU showed non-visualisation of the left kidney with a stone impacted in the pelviureteric junction. In two tetraplegic patients, an obstructed kidney became infected, and there was a delay in the diagnosis of pyonephrosis. The clinician's attention was focused on a co-existent, serious, infective pathology elsewhere. The primary focus of sepsis was chest infection in one patient and a deep pressure sore in the other. The former patient succumbed to chest infection and autopsy revealed pyonephrosis with an abscess between the left kidney and left hemidiaphragm and xanthogranulomatous inflammation of perinephric fatty tissue. In the latter patient, an abdominal X-ray did not reveal any calculus but computerised axial tomography showed the presence of renal and ureteric calculi. CONCLUSIONS: The symptoms of hydronephrosis may be bizarre and non-specific in SCI patients. The symptoms include feeling unwell, abdominal discomfort, increased spasms, and autonomic dysreflexia. Physicians should be aware of the serious import of these symptoms in SCI patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Delayed diaphragm recovery in 12 patients after high cervical spinal cord injury. A retrospective review of the diaphragm status of 107 patients ventilated after acute spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: The functional outcome of the diaphragm after acute spinal cord injury was reviewed over a 16 year period for 107 patients who had required assisted ventilation in the acute phase. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the incidence of recovery of diaphragm function which occurred beyond the period of acute oedema; to produce a time-related profile of this as a guide to clinicians considering phrenic nerve pacing; and to assess the value of phrenic nerve testing in predicting recovery. SETTING: The Southport Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, England. METHODS: Bilateral phrenic nerve and diaphragm integrity was assessed clinically, by spirometry, and by fluoroscopy without and with phrenic nerve stimulation. RESULTS: Thirty-one per cent of all the ventilated patients (33 cases), with a level of injury between C1 and C4 (Scale A in ASIA Impairment Scale), had diaphragmatic paralysis at the time of respiratory failure. The subsequent diaphragm recovery which appeared in seven of these patients, between 40 and 393 days (mean 143), permitted weaning from ventilatory support at 93 to 430 days (mean 246) after the acute injury, with a vital capacity of over 15 ml kg(-1) at that stage. The diaphragm recovery in a further five patients, whose vital capacity remained below 10 ml kg(-1) and who could not be fully weaned, occurred significantly later, between 84 and 569 days (mean 290), P=0.053. Negative phrenic nerve tests were followed by weaning at a later interval in several cases. By contrast, one patient with an early positive phrenic stimulation test and subsequent diaphragm activity could not be weaned from the ventilator. CONCLUSION: Twenty-one per cent of the patients with initial diaphragm paralysis were ultimately able to breathe independently after 4 and 14 months, whilst a further 15% had some diaphragm recovery. Phrenic nerve testing should be repeated at 3 monthly intervals for the first year after high tetraplegia.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

A review of the readmissions of patients with tetraplegia to the Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, United Kingdom, between January 1994 and December 1995.

Patients with chronic tetraplegia are prone to develop unique clinical problems which require readmission to specialised centres where the health professionals are trained specifically to diagnose, and treat the diseases afflicting this group of patients. An appraisal of the readmission pattern of tetraplegic patients will provide the necessary data for planning allocation of beds for treatment of chronic tetraplegic patients. Hospital records of patients with tetraplegia readmitted to the Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport, UK between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1995 were analyzed to find out the number of tetraplegic patients who required readmission, reasons for readmission, duration of hospital stay, and mortality among patients readmitted. During the 2-year period, 155 tetraplegic patients were readmitted and 44 of them (28.4%) required more than one readmission (total readmission episodes: 221); these patients occupied 4.5 beds which is equivalent to 11.5% of the total bed capacity of the spinal unit. Among the reasons for the readmissions, evaluation and care of urinary tract disorders topped the list with 96 readmission episodes (43.43%) involving 70 patients; the median hospital stay was 3 days, and 18 patients (26%) required more than one readmission during this period. One hospital bed was occupied by the tetraplegic patients requiring treatment/evaluation of urinary tract disorders. Assessment and treatment of cardio-respiratory diseases was the second most common reason for readmission with 51 readmission episodes pertaining to 27 patients having a median hospital stay of 6 days; 13 patients (48%) were readmitted more than once within this 2-year period. Treatment of cardio-respiratory diseases in chronic tetraplegic patients required 1.2 hospital beds yearly. Only five tetraplegic patients were readmitted for treatment of pressure sore(s); however they had a prolonged hospital stay (median duration: 101 days). Social reasons accounted for 13 readmission episodes concerning nine patients who stayed in the hospital for varying periods (median: 6.5 days; mean: 35 days). Four tetraplegic patients readmitted with acute chest infection expired. An 81 year-old tetraplegic died of myocardial infarction. Urinary sepsis, renal insufficiency, respiratory failure and intra-cerebral haemorrhage accounted for the demise of a 41 year-old tetraplegic patient following surgical removal of a large, impacted stone at the pelviureteric junction. A tetraplegic patient who was admitted with haematuria subsequently underwent cystectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder; he developed secondaries and expired 5 months later. As more patients with high cervical spinal cord injury survive the initial period of trauma, and as the life expectancy of tetraplegic patients increases, it is likely that greater numbers of tetraplegic patients will be requiring readmission to spinal injuries centre. Although it may be possible to prevent some of the complications of spinal cord injury and hence the need for a readmission, progress in medicine and rehabilitation technology will create additional demands for readmissions of chronic tetraplegic patients in order to implement the newer therapeutic strategies. Thus a change in the pattern of readmission of chronic tetraplegic patients is likely to be the future trend and this should be taken into account while making plans for providing the optimum care to chronic tetraplegic patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Pathophysiology of autonomic dysreflexia: long-term treatment with terazosin in adult and paediatric spinal cord injury patients manifesting recurrent dysreflexic episodes.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in disruption of synaptic influences on the sympathetic preganglionic neurones. Remodelling of spinal cord circuits takes place in spinal neurones caudal to cord injury. There is an increased vascular alpha-adrenoceptor responsiveness, and peripheral afferent (bladder) stimulation in SCI subjects induces a marked noradrenaline spillover below the level of spinal lesion. These neurophysiological changes possibly contribute to the development of autonomic dysreflexia, a condition of sympathetic hyper-excitability that develops after cervical, or upper dorsal cord injury with resultant paroxysmal rise in arterial pressure, and provide the scientific basis for the use of terazosin, a once-a-day, selective alpha-one adrenergic blocking drug. OBJECTIVES: The use of terazosin, a long-acting, alpha 1-selective blocking agent was investigated in SCI patients who developed recurrent symptoms of autonomic dysreflexia, eg headache, sweating flushing of the face together with an increase in the arterial pressure. DESIGN: An open, prospective study of the efficacy of terazosin in controlling recurrent autonomic dysreflexia in traumatic tetraplegic/paraplegic patients manifesting clinical features of dysreflexia in the absence of an acute precipitating cause such as a blocked catheter. SETTING: The initial assessment and treatment were carried out in the Spinal Injuries Centre. Subsequently, the patients were followed-up in the community. They were monitored by telephonic interviews, follow-up visits by the patients to the hospital, and home-visits by the staff of the spinal unit. SUBJECTS: Eighteen adults with tetraplegia (female: 1; male: 17), three children with ventilator-dependent tetraplegia and three adult male patients with paraplegia who exhibited recurrent features of autonomic dysreflexia in the absence of an acute predisposing factor for dysreflexia eg performance of an invasive procedure such as cystoscopy, digital evacuation of bowels, or acute urinary retention, were enrolled in this study. INTERVENTION: After discussion with the patients and their carers, terazosin was prescribed with a starting dose of 1 mg in an adult and 0.5 mg in a child administered nocte. The patients were observed for (1) drug-induced hypotension; (2) clinical symptoms due to side effects of terazosin; and (3) continued occurrence of dysreflexic symptoms. Step-wise increments of the dose of terazosin (1 mg in case of adults, and 0.5 mg in a child) was carried out at intervals of 3-4 days, if a patient continued to develop dysreflexia but did not manifest any serious side effect. OUTCOME MEASURES: Complete subsidence of dysreflexic symptoms, or development of an adverse event necessitating termination of the terazosin therapy was the clinical end point. RESULTS: The dysreflexic symptoms subsided completely with the terazosin therapy in all the patients. The twenty-one adult patients required a dose varying from 1-10 mg, whereas the paediatric patients required only 1-2 mg of terazosin. The side effects of postural hypotension and drowsiness were transient, and mild. One tetraplegic patient developed persistent dizziness and therefore, the drug therapy was discontinued. CONCLUSION: In 21 adult and three paediatric spinal cord injury patients manifesting recurrent episodes of autonomic dysreflexia in the absence of an acute predisposing cause, the use of terazosin, a once-a-day, specific alpha-one blocker resulted in complete subsidence of the dysreflexic symptoms. However, one tetraplegic patient required termination of terazosin therapy because of persistent dizziness.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Urine leakage from the umbilicus in a child with achondroplasia and tetraplegia (due to cervical stenosis): a safety vent for the obstructed neuropathic bladder.

Urine leakage from the umbilicus was observed while expressing urine by the Crede manoeuvre in a three-year-old tetraplegic girl with a chronically distended urinary bladder. Intravenous urography (IVU) revealed bilateral hydroureteronephrosis with markedly distended urinary bladder. Regular three hourly intermittent catheterization was advised, and the parents and carers of this child agreed to perform catheterization. There was cessation of urine leak within 48 hours of urethral drainage. Cystography performed two weeks later showed no vesicoureteric reflux; vesicoumbilical fistula was no longer demonstrable. Follow-up IVU, performed after eight and half months of regular intermittent catheterization, showed regression of hydroureteronephrosis. We believe that urine leakage from the umbilicus served two important protective functions in this child, viz. (1) it prevented possible vesical or renal rupture; (2) the striking clinical symptom of urine leak from the umbilicus focussed the attention of the carers to the underlying serious condition of the urinary tract. Further, this case demonstrates that regression of marked hydroureteronephrosis can be achieved by intermittent catheterization performed at regular intervals by devoted parents/carers, in selected cases of spinal cord injury with neuropathic bladder, and vesical outlet obstruction, thus obviating the need for any form of temporary or permanent urinary diversion.

Achondroplasia↗