Biomedical subjects

J Weijma

Publications and source records attributed to J Weijma.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Metabolic interactions in methanogenic and sulfate-reducing bioreactors.

In environments where the amount of electron acceptors is insufficient for complete breakdown of organic matter, methane is formed as the major reduced end product. In such methanogenic environments organic acids are degraded by syntrophic consortia of acetogenic bacteria and methanogenic archaea. Hydrogen consumption by methanogens is essential for acetogenic bacteria to convert organic acids to acetate and hydrogen. Several syntrophic cocultures growing on propionate and butyrate have been described. These syntrophic fatty acid-degrading consortia are affected by the presence of sulfate. When sulfate is present sulfate-reducing bacteria compete with methanogenic archaea for hydrogen and acetate, and with acetogenic bacteria for propionate and butyrate. Sulfate-reducing bacteria easily outcompete methanogens for hydrogen, but the presence of acetate as carbon source may influence the outcome of the competition. By contrast, acetoclastic methanogens can compete reasonably well with acetate-degrading sulfate reducers. Sulfate-reducing bacteria grow much faster on propionate and butyrate than syntrophic consortia.

Acetates↗

PubMed2002

Competition for H2 between sulfate reducers, methanogens and homoacetogens in a gas-lift reactor.

Reported values for growth kinetic parameters show an order in competitivity of heterotrophic sulfate reducing bacteria>methanogens>homoacetogens for the substrate hydrogen. This order suggests that methanogens can succesfully compete with consortia of heterotrophic SRB and homoacetogens when H2/CO2 is present as sole substrate. However, we found in experiments using gas-lift reactors inoculated with anaerobic sludge and fed with H2/CO2 and sulfate, that heterotrophic sulfate reduction rapidly and completely outcompeted methanogenesis, whereas a low amount of acetate was formed. Thus, in disagreement with the above competitivity order, hydrogen is more readily consumed by homoacetogenesis than by methanogenesis, indicating that the competition is not kinetically determined. The superior settling velocity of sulfidogenic-acetogenic sludge compared to that of methanogenic sludge suggests that the former sludge is better retained, which can explain the predominance of sulfate reduction/homoacetogenesis over methanogenesis.

Bioreactors↗

PubMed2002

Modelling the competition between sulphate reducers and methanogens in a thermophilic methanol-fed bioreactor.

Sulphate can be removed from wastewater by means of biological anaerobic reduction to sulphide. The reduction requires the presence of a substrate that can serve as an electron donor. Methanol a suitable electron donor for sulphate reduction under thermophilic conditions. In an anaerobic system containing methanol and sulphate, acetogenic bacteria (AB) and methanogenic archaea (MA) compete with sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) for methanol or its degradation intermediates. Previously obtained results indicate that at 65 degrees C SRB and MA mainly compete for the intermediate hydrogen instead of methanol. For efficient use of methanol as electron donor for sulphate reduction it is important that for the treatment of sulphate wastewater in an anaerobic reactor SRB out-compete MA. The mechanisms that determine the outcome of the competition are, however, not well understood. This paper describes a model based on growth kinetics of methanol-oxidising AB, and hydrogen-consuming SRB and MA, that can describe the competition between SRB and MA in a methanol-fed bioreactor. We present the model and its calibration using experimental data, and we discuss its shortcomings and suggest possible improvements.

Bioreactors↗

PubMed2001

New developments in reactor and process technology for sulfate reduction.

Sulfate reduction has been regarded in the past as an unwanted process in anaerobic treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters. Research efforts were primarily focused on H2S toxicity, competition between sulfidogenic and methanogenic microorganisms and suppression of sulfidogenesis. More recently, the potential sulfidogenesis for treating a wide range of wastestreams contaminated with oxidized sulfurous compounds and/or heavy metals was also appreciated. Heavy metals can be removed by the formation and subsequent precipitation of poorly soluble metal sulfides. Basically two approaches can be distinguished in wastewater treatment: passive treatment using low-cost technologies and active treatment in newly developed bioreactors. Both strategies are discussed.

Bioreactors↗

PubMed2001

Methanol conversion in high-rate anaerobic reactors.

An overview on methanol conversion in high-rate anaerobic reactors is presented, with the focus on technological as well as microbiological aspects. The simple C1-compound methanol can be degraded anaerobically in a complex way, in which methanogens, sulfate reducing bacteria and homoacetogens interact cooperatively or competitively at substrate level. This interaction has large technological implications as it determines the final product of methanol mineralization, methane or carbon dioxide. The degradation route of methanol may be entirely different when environmental conditions change. Direct methanogenesis from methanol seems the predominant mineralization route under mesophilic conditions both in the absence and the presence of sulfate. Under thermophilic conditions methanol oxidation to carbon dioxide and hydrogen appears to play an important role. The UASB technology for mesophilic digestion of methanolic waste has presently reached full-scale maturity. The potential of methanol as feedstock for anaerobic processes is discussed.

Bacteria, Anaerobic↗

PubMed2000

Thermophilic sulfate reduction and methanogenesis with methanol in a high rate anaerobic reactor.

Sulfate reduction outcompeted methanogenesis at 65 degrees C and pH 7.5 in methanol and sulfate-fed expanded granular sludge bed reactors operated at hydraulic retention times (HRT) of 14 and 3.5 h, both under methanol-limiting and methanol-overloading conditions. After 100 and 50 days for the reactors operated at 14 and 3.5 h, respectively, sulfide production accounted for 80% of the methanol-COD consumed by the sludge. The specific methanogenic activity on methanol of the sludge from a reactor operated at HRTs of down to 3.5 h for a period of 4 months gradually decreased from 0. 83 gCOD. gVSS(-1). day(-1) at the start to a value of less than 0.05 gCOD. gVSS(-1). day(-1), showing that the relative number of methanogens decreased and eventually became very low. By contrast, the increase of the specific sulfidogenic activity of sludge from 0. 22 gCOD. gVSS(-1). day(-1) to a final value of 1.05 gCOD. gVSS(-1). day(-1) showed that sulfate reducing bacteria were enriched. Methanol degradation by a methanogenic culture obtained from a reactor by serial dilution of the sludge was inhibited in the presence of vancomycin, indicating that methanogenesis directly from methanol was not important. H(2)/CO(2) and formate, but not acetate, were degraded to methane in the presence of vancomycin. These results indicated that methanol degradation to methane occurs via the intermediates H(2)/CO(2) and formate. The high and low specific methanogenic activity of sludge on H(2)/CO(2) and formate, respectively, indicated that the former substrate probably acts as the main electron donor for the methanogens during methanol degradation. As sulfate reduction in the sludge was also strongly supported by hydrogen, competition between sulfate reducing bacteria and methanogens in the sludge seemed to be mainly for this substrate. Sulfate elimination rates of up to 15 gSO(4)(2-)/L per day were achieved in the reactors. Biomass retention limited the sulfate elimination rate.

Acetates↗

PubMed2000

Performance of a thermophilic sulfate and sulfite reducing high rate anaerobic reactor fed with methanol.

Thermophilic sulfate and sulfite reduction was studied in lab-scale Expanded Granular Sludge Bed (EGSB) reactors operated at 65 degrees C and pH 7.5 with methanol as the sole carbon and energy source for the sulfate- and sulfite-reducing bacteria. At a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 10 h, maximum sulfite and sulfate elimination rates of 5.5 g SO3(2-) L(-1) day(-1) (100% elimination) and 5.7 g SO4(2-) L(-1) day(-1) (55% elimination) were achieved, resulting in an effluent sulfide concentration of approximately 1800 mg S L(-1). Sulfate elimination was limited by the sulfide concentration, as stripping of H2S from the reactor with nitrogen gas was found to increase the sulfate elimination rate to 9.9 g SO4(2-) L(-1) day(-1) (100% elimination). At a HRT of 3 h, maximum achievable sulfite and sulfate elimination rates were even 18 g SO3(2-) L(-1) day(-1) (100% elimination) and 11 g SO4(2-) L(-1) day(-1) (50% elimination). At a HRT of 3 h, the elimination rate was limited by the biomass retention of the system. 5.5 +/- 1.8% of the consumed methanol was converted to acetate, which was not further degraded by sulfate reducing bacteria present in the sludge. The acetotrophic activity of the sludge could not be stimulated by cultivating the sludge for 30 days under methanol-limiting conditions. Omitting cobalt as trace element from the influent resulted in a lower acetate production rate, but it also led to a lower sulfate reduction rate. Sulfate degradation in the reactor could be described by zeroth order kinetics down to a threshold concentration of 0.05 g L(-1), while methanol degradation followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics with a Km of 0.037 g COD L(-1).

Anaerobiosis↗

PubMed1994

Cometabolic degradation of trichloroethylene by Pseudomonas cepacia G4 in a chemostat with toluene as the primary substrate.

Pseudomonas cepacia G4 is capable of cometabolic degradation of trichloroethylene (TCE) if the organism is grown on certain aromatic compounds. To obtain more insight into the kinetics of TCE degradation and the effect of TCE transformation products, we have investigated the simultaneous conversion of toluene and TCE in steady-state continuous culture. The organism was grown in a chemostat with toluene as the carbon and energy source at a range of volumetric TCE loading rates, up to 330 mumol/liter/h. The specific TCE degradation activity of the cells and the volumetric activity increased, but the efficiency of TCE conversion dropped when the TCE loading was elevated from 7 to 330 mumol/liter/h. At TCE loading rates of up to 145 mumol/liter/h, the specific toluene conversion rate and the molar growth yield of the cells were not affected by the presence of TCE. The response of the system to varying TCE loading rates was accurately described by a mathematical model based on Michaelis-Menten kinetics and competitive inhibition. A high load of 3,400 mumol of TCE per liter per h for 12 h caused inhibition of toluene and TCE conversion, but reduction of the TCE load to the original nontoxic level resulted in complete recovery of the system within 2 days. These results show that P. cepacia can stably and continuously degrade toluene and TCE simultaneously in a single-reactor system without biomass retention and that the organism is more resistant to high concentrations and shock loadings of TCE than Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b.

Bacteriological Techniques↗