Biomedical subjects

J Y Sever

Publications and source records attributed to J Y Sever.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

The radial artery versus the saphenous vein graft in contemporary CABG: a case-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Although use of the internal thoracic artery has been shown to improve outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting, the same cannot be said of alternative arterial conduits. To determine the benefit of radial artery (RA) grafting, a case-matched review was undertaken. METHODS: Between March 1994 and March 1999, 2,847 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with a left internal thoracic artery graft, plus saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). Of these patients, 478 also received an RA graft (RA group). The RA patients were matched at a ratio of 1:2 with patients receiving only SVGs and a left internal thoracic artery graft (SVG group; n = 956) using six prognostic risk factors: age, sex, Canadian Cardiovascular Society class, left ventricular grade, number of diseased vessels, and timing of operation. Target vessels were graded according to quality and graftability and were similar between groups. Outcomes were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There was a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease in the RA group (p < 0.05). Although stay in the intensive care unit was shorter in the RA group (RA, 30 +/- 2 hours, and SVG, 37 +/- 2 hours; p = 0.0002), total hospital stay was similar between groups. The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction was higher in the SVG group (SVG, 31 of 956 or 3.2%, and RA, 6 of 478 or 1.3%; p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed RA grafting to be protective against early mortality and morbidity (odds ratio = 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.90; p = 0.015) and late mortality and morbidity including late reintervention (risk ratio = 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.93; p = 0.02). Actuarial freedom from events at 36 months postoperatively was greater in the RA group (RA, 95% +/- 2%, and SVG, 86% +/- 4%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher prevalence of preoperative comorbidity, patients in the RA group demonstrated improved outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. The RA is a viable and beneficial conduit for this operation.

Case-Control Studies↗

PubMed2000

Late results of the Warm Heart Trial: the influence of nonfatal cardiac events on late survival.

BACKGROUND: The Warm Heart Trial randomized 1732 CABG patients to receive warm or cold blood cardioplegia. In the warm cardioplegia patients, nonfatal perioperative cardiac events were significantly decreased and the mortality rate was nonsignificantly decreased (1. 4% versus 2.5%, P:=0.12). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the late results of these trial patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomization was stratified according to surgeon and urgency of the operation. Seven hundred sixty-two patients recruited from 1 of the centers were followed through the hospital clinic for late events. Late survival (including perioperative deaths) at 72 months was nonsignificantly greater in the warm cardioplegia patients (94.5+/-1.7%, mean+/-SEM) than in the cold cardioplegia patients (90.9+/-2.6%). Independent predictors of mortality by Cox proportional hazards model were redo CABG, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, and increasing age. The influence of nonfatal perioperative events (perioperative myocardial infarction according to computerized ECG readings or low output syndrome as determined by an outcome committee) on late survival was also analyzed. Late survival at 84 months was significantly reduced in the group who experienced nonfatal perioperative outcomes (94.5+/-1.7% versus 84. 9+/-4.5%, P:<0.001) and remained a significant predictor after adjustment for other important variables (risk ratio 6.4, 95% CI 1. 87 to 8.73, P:<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Effective myocardial protection through either cold or warm blood cardioplegia is essential, because late survival is significantly reduced in patients with nonfatal perioperative cardiac outcomes.

Cardioplegic Solutions↗

PubMed2000

Trends in coronary artery bypass surgery results: a recent, 9-year study.

BACKGROUND: The demographics of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have changed over time and may contribute to differing operative mortality and the combination of mortality and morbidity (M + M). In this study, the trends in results are analyzed and causes are suggested. METHODS: Prospectively collected data concerning 4,839 CABG operations was divided into three time cohorts (1990 to 1992, 1993 to 1995, 1996 to 1998) and analyzed by univariate and multivariate techniques. RESULTS: Mean age and female gender frequency increased in the later time cohorts (60.7 +/- 9.0 to 63.4 +/- 9.9 years and 16.5% to 21.4%, respectively). The following comorbidities were more prevalent in the later time cohorts: diabetes (26.7% versus 18.6%), renal failure (8.5% versus 2.2%), peripheral vascular disease (20.7% versus 11.0%), previous cerebrovascular accident (6.7% versus 5.0%), urgent procedures (41.5% versus 26.9%), unstable angina (47.8% versus 31.7%), urgent CABG following myocardial infarction (17.1% versus 7.3%), previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (8.0% versus 4.5%), ejection fraction less than 35% (20.5% versus 10.4%), (all p < 0.05). Procedurally, increased utilization of the left internal mammary artery, multiple arterial conduits, and warm blood cardioplegia occurred in the later cohorts (91.2%, 22.2%, and 80.4% versus 78.7%, 3.4%, and 38.0%, respectively). The mortality rate was 2.0% and the M + M rate was 15.6% in all 4,839 patients. The mortality and M + M for the three cohorts were 1.6%, 2.0%, and 2.3% and 18.4%, 17.2% and 12.5%, respectively. The risk-adjusted mortality and M + M decreased from 2.4% and 15.9%, respectively, in 1990 to 1992 to 1.8% and 8.4% in 1996 to 1998 (p < 0.001). The difference in adjusted event rates was minimized when the surgical factors were entered into the model. CONCLUSIONS: Over time, there has been a trend toward operating on older patients with more comorbidities. Though hospital mortality has been stable, risk-adjusted M + M has been in a constant decline. This decline was associated with an increased use of left internal mammary artery grafts, multiple arterial conduits, and warm blood cardioplegia during the later years of the study.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

The influence of gender on the outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of gender as an independent risk factor for early and late morbidity and mortality following coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS: Perioperative and long-term data on all 4,823 patients undergoing isolated coronary bypass operations from November 1989 to July 1998 were analyzed. Of these patients, 932 (19.3%) were females. RESULTS: During the years 1989 to 1998 there was a progressive increase in the percentage of women undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. The following preoperative risk factors were more prevalent among women than men: age above 70, angina class 3 or 4, urgent operation, preoperative intraaortic balloon pump usage, congestive heart failure, previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, diabetes, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease (all p < 0.05). Men were more likely to have an ejection fraction less than 35%, three-vessel disease, repeat operations, and a recent history of smoking. Women had a statistically significant smaller mean body surface area than men (1.72+/-0.18 versus 1.96%+/-0.26% m2). On average, women had fewer bypass grafts constructed than men (2.9%+/-0.8% versus 3.2%+/-0.9%) and were less likely to have internal mammary artery grafting (76.2% versus 86.1%), multiple arterial conduits (10.1% versus 19.8%), or coronary endarterectomy performed (4.9% versus 8.6%). The early mortality rate in women was 2.7% versus 1.8% in men (p = 0.09). Women were more prone to perioperative myocardial infarction (4.5% versus 3.1% p < 0.05). After adjustment for other risk variables, female gender was not an independent predictor of early mortality but was a weak independent predictor for the prespecified composite endpoint of death, perioperative myocardial infarction, intraaortic balloon counterpulsation pump insertion, or stroke (8.55 versus 5.9%; odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.68; p = 0.05) Recurrent angina class 3 or 4 was more frequent in female patients (15.2%+/-4.0% versus 8.5%+/-2.0% at 60 months, p = 0.001) but not repeat revascularization procedures (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, redo) (0.6%+/-0.3% versus 4.1%+/-0.8% at 60 months). Actuarial survival at 60 months was greater in women then men (93.1%+/-1.7% versus 90.0%+/-1.0%), and after adjustment for other risk variables, female gender was protective for late survival (risk ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.74; p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative complications were increased and recurrent angina more frequent in women. Despite this, late survival was increased in women compared with men after adjustment for other risk variables

Age Factors↗

PubMed1997

Early experience with stentless versus stented valves.

BACKGROUND: The Toronto stentless porcine valve (SPV) was designed to improve hemodynamics after aortic valve replacement by maximizing available flow area in comparison to stented valves (STD). METHODS: To assess possible hemodynamic differences between STD and SPV, 59 patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (+/-coronary artery bypass graft) were prospectively evaluated by preoperative and 3- to 6-month postoperative echocardiography. Among these, 23 patients received a STD, whereas 36 received the Toronto SPV. RESULTS: The mean size (mm) of SPV implanted was larger (SPV, 26.6+/-2.1; STD, 24.0+/-2.9; P=0.0002). Patients receiving STD valves were older and had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure. There were no preoperative differences in left ventricular mass index (g/mo2), peak or mean pressure gradients (mmHg), effective orifice area (cm2), extent of fractional shortening (%), or velocity of circumferential shortening (cf/sec). ANOVA demonstrated a significant reduction in left ventricular mass index at 3 to 6 months (P=.0001) but no differences in left ventricular mass index regression between groups (STD, -28.8+/-37.5; SPV, -31.2+/-32.4; P=.36). Effective orafice area was increased postoperatively (P=.0001), particularly among SPV cases (STD, 1.5+/-0.4; SPV, 1.9+/-0.7; P=.01). Postoperative left ventricular mass index and mean pressure gradient were reduced (P=.0001) but did not differ between groups. Fractional shortening and velocity of circumferential shortening were greater in the SPV patients at 3 to 6 months after aortic valve replacement (P=.0004 and .0001, respectively), and an interactive effect was seen between time and prosthetic group (P=.0028 and .032, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In a consecutive series of patients, we identified no hemodynamic differences between STD and SPV, although ventricular function improved after SPV. Because of the nonrandomized nature of the study, selection bias may have accounted for some of the observed results. A prospective, randomized trial is necessary to determine the hemodynamic advantages, if any, of the SPV valve.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Left ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy is an important and well-recognized salutary effect of aortic valve replacement. The earliest evidence of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement and the influence of prosthesis type are not well known, and were the focus of this study. METHODS: Transthoracic echocardiography was used to measure left ventricular mass index preoperatively and before discharge in 57 consecutive patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (with or without coronary artery bypass grafting). RESULTS: Three patients were excluded from the study because of inability to obtain accurate M-mode echocardiographic images for left ventricular mass measurement preoperatively (1) or postoperatively (2). Of the remaining 54 patients, mechanical bileaflet valves were used in 19, stented tissue bioprostheses were implanted in 15, and a stentless porcine bioprosthesis was chosen for 20. Postoperative echocardiograms were obtained 4.9 +/- 2.3 days after aortic valve replacement (range, 2 to 9 days). A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance demonstrated a significant reduction of left ventricular mass index before discharge (preoperative 141.4 +/- 45.2 g/m2, postoperative 127.5 +/- 32.8 g/m2; p = 0.0005) but no differences between prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular mass regression begins early after aortic valve replacement, probably because of reduction of transvalvular gradients and left ventricular wall stress. At least in the very early postoperative period, the type of prosthesis does not influence the extent of mass regression.

Aged↗