PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

J Yancey

Publications and source records attributed to J Yancey.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Can retinal adhesion mechanisms determine cell-sorting patterns: a test of the differential adhesion hypothesis.

Embryonic chick neural retina cells possess two classes of adhesion mechanism, one Ca2+-independent, one Ca2+-dependent, responsible for short-term cell aggregation. This study investigates the role of these mechanisms in the long-term cell sorting potentially relevant to in vivo histogenesis. Retina cells are prepared either with both (E cells) or with only one mechanism (TC cells, CD; LTE cells, CI), respectively. The two types of cell preparations are differentially labelled using fluorescein or rhodamine isothiocyanate, mixed and allowed to aggregate in the presence or absence of cycloheximide at 0.5 microgram ml-1 to retard metabolic recovery of the removed adhesive mechanism. When observed by fluorescence and phase-contrast microscopy, the aggregates formed in cycloheximide show cell sorting, the cells with both mechanisms assuming a more interior position relative to those with a single adhesion mechanism. In parallel hanging-drop experiments, preformed aggregates of cells with a single adhesion mechanism are seen to spread upon aggregates of cells with both mechanisms. No sorting occurs amongst cells from a given stage prepared using any single dissociation protocol. The observed cell sorting would thus seem to derive exclusively from differential cell adhesiveness dependent upon the different dissociation conditions and maintained in the presence of cycloheximide. The experiments support the hypothesis that the dual CI and CD adhesion mechanisms in question can play a central role in governing cell-sorting behaviour during normal histogenesis.

Animals

Repeated measures analysis of geometrically constructed and directly determined cephalometric points.

Cephalometric landmarks were directly determined visually from bony anatomy on lateral cephalometric radiographs and compared with geometrically constructed cephalometric landmarks for repeated measures reliability of identification. Three groups of four orthodontists, grouped by level of experience, identified 18 landmarks on each of four cephalometric radiographs. This measurement procedure was repeated four times in 1-week intervals. The variability, main associations and interactions among the variables of tracer experience, quality of radiograph traced, and the anatomic landmarks traced were assessed by means of the repeated measures analysis of variance and follow-up Tukey HSD test. The coefficient of variation was used to compare the relative variability of replicate identification of the 18 cephalometric landmarks. Rank order and statistically significant groupings by variability are listed. The level of observer experience and quality of radiograph were statistically unrelated to landmark variability on replicate examination. The geometrically constructed landmarks tested were not statistically different from the reliability of the directly determined bony-based landmarks. This finding would lend support to the techniques of geometric construction used in the Ricketts cephalometric analysis.

Cephalometry