PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J de Irala-Estévez

Publications and source records attributed to J de Irala-Estévez.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Comparison of different methodological approaches to identify risk factors of nosocomial infection in intensive care units.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of statistical methods and measurement scales to identify nosocomial infection risk factors in intensive care units (ICU). DESIGN: Prospective study in 558 patients admitted to the ICU of a referral hospital between February and November 1994. METHODS: Analysis using three logistic regression models, three standard Cox regression models, and two Cox regression models with time-dependent extrinsic factors. Different scales were used to measure exposures to risk factors (dichotomous, ordinal, quantitative, and time-dependent variables). RESULTS: The most appropriate models were those that measured exposure using dichotomous variables. Models using ordinal or quantitative variables estimated biased coefficients and/or failed to comply with the statistical assumptions underlying the analyses. The Cox regression model with quantitative time-dependent variables met all the statistical assumptions, obtained a precise assessment of risk by exposure time, and estimated unbiased coefficients. CONCLUSIONS: The Cox regression analysis with quantitative time-dependent variables is the most valid alternative for assessing the risk of nosocomial infection per day of exposure to an extrinsic risk factor in the ICU.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed2001

Factors associated with the condoning of female genital mutilation among university students.

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is practiced in Egypt, despite its recent ban, generally in rural and uneducated communities, under unsanitary conditions and by non-medical personnel. Immediate and long-term complications are frequent. The aim of this study was to gain insight into what beliefs or knowledge are conducive to supporting FGM. One thousand and seventy university students in Cairo, Egypt were randomly selected. A 32-item questionnaire was used to interview students regarding their knowledge and attitudes toward FGM. Multivariable analyses were performed to find factors associated with being against the abolishment of FGM.The response rate was 95% (n=1020). Twenty-eight percent of the students support FGM. The most significant factors associated with the condoning of FGM were believing FGM has a religious basis (OR=2.53), disagreeing that FGM is a custom with no other basis (OR=2.59), not believing it is harmful (OR=4.11), and ignoring that it is usually followed by complications (OR=5.14). Even in an educated population, a considerable amount of ignorance concerning FGM exists. Widespread education about FGM is important to dispel the myths that surround its practice and to bring the practice to an end.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Differences in the quality of Spanish clinical trials published in international periodicals and of the ones presented in general medicine periodicals with wide readership].

BACKGROUND: The assessment of the methodological quality of controlled clinical trials (CCTs) carried out in Spain and published in international journals and the comparison with those published in widely read general journals of medicine (N Engl J Med, Lancet, JAMA, BMJ) may help establishing their limitations and improving quality in future studies. METHODS: Search in Medline of CCTs. Studies were evaluated according to a structured questionnaire (J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45:225-265). The odds ratio and their 95% confidence intervals were used to compare spanish studies with the remaining studies. The following variables were considered as confounders and controlled for by logistic regression analysis: number of participating centers, sample size, funding source, and the inclusion of epidemiologists in the research team. The journal's impact factor was taken into account. RESULTS: Spanish CTTs had a smaller sample size, were mostly monocentric, reported les frequently the source of funding, and exhibited a lower participation of epidemiologists. The informed consent and the approval by the ethics committee were more frequently omitted. The major methodological differences with the other studies were: lack of pre-study sample size and statistical power estimation, lack of inclusion criteria, poor explanation of patients' flow in the selection process, lack of explanation for unmasked procedures, poor description of methods to assess intervention compliance, under-reporting confidence intervals, and less frequent use of the intention-to-treat principle. The quality score of spanish studies was lower (9.4 +/- 1.7 vs 10.7 +/- 1.5; p < 0.001). These limitations improved with higher journal's impact factor, the quality score was 8.5 in journals with an impact factor < 1.5, and 10.6 in those with an impact factor > 4.5. This last figure is almost identical to the average of CCTs published in general journals of medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Most spanish studies achieved a good quality score. Nevertheless, there are still issues which can be overcome easily. If this goal is achieved, the results will obtain a higher repercussion, as a better quality is observed in those published in journals with the highest impact factor.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2000

[Prevalence of eating disorders in a representative sample of female adolescents from Navarra (Spain)].

BACKGROUND: In spite of the social concern about eating disorders (ED), information of its prevalence in Spain is limited. Further studies in communities are needed to estimate the frequency of this problem in representative samples of the population. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: To estimate the prevalence of anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and partial syndromes of the "non specified eating disorders" (NOSED) type, a representative sample of the female population of Navarre was selected using a random multistage sampling scheme. A sample of 2862 participants aged 12 to 21 was studied. The screening procedure was performed using the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT) (values over 30 as the cutoff point) and each diagnosis was confirmed using a semi-structured interview performed by a psychiatry according to DSM-IV criteria. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ED in this female population was 4.1% (95% CI: 3.45-4.95). The disorder specific prevalences being NOSED 3.1% (95% CI: 2.5-3.8), BN 0.8 (95% CI: 0.5-1.2) and AN 0.3 (95% CI: 0.1-0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a slight lower prevalence than what other Spanish authors have reported, although we found higher prevalences of incomplete syndromes and suggest that a high social burden does exist and primary prevention strategies are needed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Barriers and benefits of a healthy diet in spain: comparison with other European member states.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to identify the main barriers and benefits perceived by the European citizens in regard to following a healthy diet and to assess the differences in expected benefits and difficulties between Spain and the remaining countries of the European Union. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study in which quota-controlled, nationally representative samples of approximately 1000 adults from each country completed a questionnaire. SETTING: The survey was carried out between October 1995 and February 1996 in the 15 member states of the European Union. SUBJECTS: Participants (aged 15 y and older) were selected and interviewed in their homes about their attitudes towards healthy diets. They were asked to select two options from a list of 22 potential barriers to achieve a healthy diet and the benefits derived from a healthy diet. The associations of the perceived benefits of barriers with the sociodemographic variables within Spain and the rest of the European Union were compared with the Pearson chi-squared test and the chi-squared linear trend test. Two multivariate logistic regression models were also fitted to assess the characteristics independently related to the selection of 'Resistance to change' among the main barriers and to the selection of 'Prevent disease/stay healthy' as the main perceived benefits. RESULTS: The barrier most frequently mentioned in Spain was 'Irregular work hours' (29.7%) in contrast with the rest of the European Union where 'Giving up foods that I like' was the barrier most often chosen (26.2%). In the multivariate logistic regression model studying resistance to change, Spaniards were less resistant to change than the rest of the European Union. The benefit more frequently mentioned across Europe was 'Prevent disease/stay healthy'. In the multivariate logistic regression model women, older individuals, and people with a higher educational level were more likely to choose this benefit. CONCLUSIONS: It is apparent that there are many barriers to achieve healthy eating, mostly lack of time. For this reason a higher availability of food in line with the nutrition guidelines could be helpful. The population could have a better knowledge of the benefits derived from a healthy diet.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

[The perceptions of the adult Spanish population of the factors determinative of health].

OBJECTIVE: To assess which are the most important perceived influential factors on health among the Spanish adult population. This may provide sufficient information to promote primary health care campaigns directed specifically to those that acknowledge that lifestyles are important in spite of not living healthy lifestyles themselves. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. SETTING: Spain (Canary Islands not included). PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of 1000 Spanish participants over 15 years old selected by a multistage procedure. INTERVENTION: Survey to evaluate the population choosing one of nine known health-related factors (smoking, food, alcohol intake, stress, physical activity, environment, body weight, support from family, genetics) as being one of the two most important factors influencing health through a validated questionnaire. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The chi-square test for linear trend was used to assess the influence of factors coded on an ordinal scale. The Pearson chi-square test was applied for categorical factors. Smoking was considered the most influential health-related factor by most participants (47.8%). Males, those from lower socioeconomic and educational levels; people living in the south of Spain, and rural regions; those married and individuals who had 3 or more children below 15 years, perceived smoking more often as one of the most important determinants of health. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a large percentage of the Spanish adult population recognizes that life-styles are important determinants of health.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The perception of body image as a qualitative approach to nutritional status].

OBJECTIVE: To compare body image perception with body mass index (BMI) calculated from the weight and size declared by subjects, and to evaluate its usefulness in classifying the nutritional status. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A representative sample of the Spanish population was selected consisting of 517 males and 483 females older than 15 years of age. Variables were sex, age, educational level, BMI and perceived body image. Differences between groups were estimated with the chi 2 test. Specificity and sensitivity of the agreement between body mass and image were assessed. RESULTS: The nutritional status for both indicators revealed higher overweight prevalence in males and obesity in females, which increase with age and decrease with greater educational level. Perceived body image differed between sexes, and among ages and educational levels (p < 0.01). Sensitivity and specificity as well as positive and negative predictive values were higher than 0.90 in subjects belonging to extreme cases. Precision was higher for sensitivity than for specificity. In all groups, categorization was better in females than in males and so was Spearman's correlation (p < 0.001). The Kendall W coefficient ranked high for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Body image allowed the identification of individuals with normal, excessive or lean nutrition. This indicator can therefore be useful in epidemiological surveys, considering some limitations for individualized diagnoses.

Adolescent↗