Biomedical subjects

J de Wildt-Eggen

Publications and source records attributed to J de Wildt-Eggen.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Interruption of agitation of platelet concentrates: effects on in vitro parameters.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: When platelet concentrates (PCs) are shipped from one centre to another, they may remain unagitated for a considerable period of time. It was therefore our aim to study the effects of interruption of agitation on the in vitro parameters of PCs stored in platelet additive solutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicentre study, PCs were prepared either by apheresis or from pooled buffy coats, paired to minimize donor-dependent differences, and aliquoted into 3 units with a 'low concentration' (approximately 1 x 10(9) platelets/ml; groups A, B and C) and 3 units with a 'high concentration' (approximately 2 x 10(9) platelets/ml; groups D, E and F). The final composition of the storage medium was 30% plasma and 70% additive solution in all PCs. Either PASIIIM or Composol was used as the additive solution. Agitation was interrupted for 2 days (between days 3 and 5, groups A and D), or for 4 days (between days 1 and 5, groups B and E), and continuous agitation served as the reference (groups C and F). A number of in vitro parameters were used for testing on days 1, 5 and 7. RESULTS: On day 7, reference units C and F in PASIIIM had significantly higher pH values than the study units in PASIIIM, but all retained a pH of > 6.5 at 37 degrees C. Hypotonic shock response (HSR) results were significantly lower in the high concentration/4-day interruption group (E) than in the other groups. The low-concentration groups in PASIIIM, with agitation interrupted for either 2 days (group A) or 4 days (group B), did not have HSR values significantly different from the respective references. Study groups A, B, D and E in Composol, a solution lacking phosphate, had a pH of approximately 6.5 on day 7, which was significantly lower than that of the references and of the corresponding units in PASIIIM. The pH values were > 7.0 in reference groups C and F in Composol, not significantly different from those in PASIIIM. HSR values were also significantly lower in the Composol study groups. On the other hand, the reference Composol groups showed results similar to units in PASIIIM. CONCLUSIONS: PCs in PASIIIM additive solution with a platelet concentration of approximately 1 x 10(9)/ml can sustain 4 days without agitation. Phosphate may be of importance in maintaining good in vitro characteristics during interruption of agitation.

Blood Platelets↗

PubMed2003

Crossover study of three methods for low-level white blood cell counting on two types of flow cytometer.

BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric methods were previously shown to be preferable to microscopic and volumetric methods for counting residual white blood cells (WBCs). In this study, three flow cytometric, low-level WBC counting methods were cross compared using two flow cytometers. METHODS: Double-filtered red cell and platelet concentrates were spiked with different amounts of WBC to obtain panels of unspiked and 0.3, 1.0, 3.3, and 10.0 WBC/microl. The methods of BD Biosciences (BDB), Beckman-Coulter (BC), and an in-house method were performed on flow cytometers from BDB and BC. Samples were measured in ninefold. We required that (a) r(2) be at least 0.98 (linearity), (b) at least 80% of observations fell within 20% of expected values (accuracy), and (c) the coefficients of variation be at least 20% (precision) for samples containing at least 3.3 WBC/microl. RESULTS: For the red cell panel, our requirements were met by the BDB method on both flow cytometers and by the BC and in-house methods on the BDB flow cytometer only. For the platelet panel, our requirements were met on all combinations of methods and flow cytometers, except for the in-house method on the BDB flow cytometer. Intra-assay variation was lowest for the BDB method, irrespective of the type of flow cytometer used. CONCLUSION: Based on accuracy and precision, the BDB method on the BDB flow cytometer produced the best results for counting low-level WBCs.

Cell Separation↗

PubMed2003

In vivo and in vitro comparison of platelets stored in either synthetic media or plasma.

Since 1980, several synthetic media have been developed for the storage of platelets for transfusion. At present, platelets suspended in approximately 70% synthetic medium and 30% plasma can be stored for at least 5 days at very stable pH levels, generally pH 6.8-7.2. Present knowledge suggests that synthetic media should contain at least acetate, citrate, phosphate, potassium and magnesium. Future studies will probably result in the inclusion of other components to this list. Glucose for platelet metabolism will generally be supplied by carryover of plasma from the original platelet preparation. In addition, improved plastic containers for the storage of platelets will probably facilitate the introduction of new synthetic media. In six studies comparing synthetic media with plasma as the storage environment, and involving patients with intensive chemotherapy for haematological malignancies, the clinical outcome in terms of corrected count increments (CCI) generally indicated similar results. Three studies suggested significant reduction of the incidence of transfusion reactions of platelets suspended in synthetic media as compared with plasma. For future comparisons of platelet storage in either plasma or new synthetic media, additional platelet survival and recovery studies, as well as patient-transfusion studies, will be needed as in vitro data may not always reflect the clinical outcome. This will add further knowledge to data from the present few clinical studies available that compare storage of platelets in either synthetic media or plasma.

Blood Platelets↗

PubMed2003

Storage of platelets in additive solutions: a multicentre study of the in vitro effects of potassium and magnesium.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In a preliminary study, the presence of potassium and magnesium in a modified synthetic medium (PAS-III) was found to have a significant influence on platelet metabolism (using apheresis-derived, as well as buffy-coat-derived platelets) when compared with standard PAS-III. The differences included reduced glycolysis, as evidenced by lower consumption of glucose and lower production of lactate, but also better preservation of pH and hypotonic shock response reactivity. The results suggested that storage in modified PAS-III containing 20% plasma was comparable to storage in standard PAS-III containing 30% plasma. To confirm the preliminary results and to evaluate the effects of different preparation protocols, an international multicentre study, which included 11 different sites, was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Platelets from 30 pools of approximately 20 buffy coat (BC) units each and 24 pooled apheresis platelet units were aliquoted for storage in plasma (reference) or synthetic medium using either a specific additive solution (PAS-III) containing 30% plasma or a modification of PAS-III containing 5.0 mm potassium and 1.5 mm magnesium (PAS-IIIM) and either 30% or 20% plasma. Units were stored at room temperature with agitation for 7 days during which in vitro testing was carried out for biochemical, haematological and functional parameters. RESULTS: Storage of platelets in PAS-IIIM resulted in a reduction in the rate of glycolysis and better retention of pH and hypotonic shock response reactivity. Storage in PAS-IIIM containing 20% plasma appeared to result in the retention of in vitro properties, similar to those observed during storage in standard PAS-III containing 30% plasma. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm the preliminary results. Similar results were seen with platelets prepared by BC and apheresis methods, despite differences in equipment, the preparation technique and in the final platelet contents achieved in the platelet units. Storage of platelets in PAS-IIIM should be considered to improve platelet function and allow plasma reduction to 20%.

Blood Component Removal↗

PubMed2001

Comparison of five platforms for enumeration of residual leucocytes in leucoreduced blood components.

The need for quality control of leucoreduction of blood products has led to the development of various methods to count low levels of residual leucocytes. We compared five platforms side-by-side: the Nageotte haemocytometer and four based on fluorescent staining of nuclei: two flowcytometers (Beckman Coulter, BD Biosciences) with methods based on counting beads, a volumetric flow cytometer (Partec) and the microvolumic fluorimeter ImagN2000 (BD Biosciences), all according to their manufacturers' recommended methods. Analysis of double-filtered red cell concentrates (RCCs) and platelet concentrates (PCs), spiked with various numbers of leucocytes, revealed good linearity for all methods over the range of 1.6-32.7 leucocytes/microl, all with r(2) > 0.99. At the rejection level of leucocyte-reduced blood components, i.e. 1 x 10(6) per unit corresponding with approximately 3.3 leucocytes/microl, the Nageotte haemocytometer had low accuracy (0% for RCCs, 56% for PCs), and was relatively imprecise [coefficient of variance (CV) of 34% and 30% respectively]. The Partec flow cytometer gave good results for RCCs (accuracy 67%, CV 22%), but not for PCs (accuracy 0%, CV 25%). The ImagN2000 had an accuracy of 44% for RCCs and 89% for PCs, but the precision was variable (CV 32% for RCCs, 15% for PCs). The best results were obtained with the Beckman Coulter (RCCs: accuracy 86%, CV 13%, PCs: accuracy 67%, CV 16%), and BD Biosciences platforms (RCCs: accuracy 100%, CV 10%; PCs: accuracy 89%, CV 11%). We conclude that, at the rejection level of 1 x 10(6) leucocytes per unit, the widely used Nageotte haemocytometer performs poorly in terms of inaccuracy and imprecision, and that both counting-bead-based, flow cytometric methods performed best.

Flow Cytometry↗

PubMed2001

WBC content of platelet concentrates prepared by the buffy coat method using different processing procedures and storage solutions.

BACKGROUND: The number of WBCs in platelet concentrates (PCs) prepared by the buffy coat (BC) method with different storage solutions can result in low (5 x 10(6)/unit) WBC levels by the use of careful centrifugation techniques without filtration. At present, most blood banks use filtration steps to meet these requirements. The difference in processing methods and suspension solutions prompted the investigation of the influence of the various procedures on the WBC and platelet content of PCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PCs from 5 BCs were harvested without or with inline filtration (AutoStop BC, Pall Corp.) in either plasma (PCs-plasma) or platelet additive solution (PCs-PAS-2). After preparation, samples were taken for counting WBCs and platelets and for analyzing WBC subsets by flow cytometry using specific MoAbs. The WBCs were concentrated before analysis of the WBC subsets. Results less than 2.5 cells per microL were considered below the limit of accuracy of the subset analysis. RESULTS: All filtered PCs met the AABB standard of 5 x 10(6) per unit and the European guidelines of 1 x 10(6) per unit. None of the nonfiltered PCs met the European guidelines, but all met the AABB guidelines. All filtered units gave residual WBC counts below the detection limit for subset analysis. Filtered PCs-plasma gave significantly higher platelet counts than filtered PCs-PAS-2 or nonfiltered PCs (p<0.01, ANOVA). CONCLUSION: Careful centrifugation of pooled BCs, with plasma or PAS-2, can result in PCs with low WBC contamination levels. However, filtered PCs are superior, because of better WBC removal and higher platelet counts.

Acetates↗

PubMed2000

Reactions and platelet increments after transfusion of platelet concentrates in plasma or an additive solution: a prospective, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Reactions after platelet transfusions are rather common and frequently are caused by plasma constituents. In recent developments, the preparation and storage of platelet concentrates (PCs) in a platelet additive solution (PAS-2) have been shown to result in acceptable storage conditions. A major drawback of the use of these PCs is the progressive increase of P-selectin-positive platelets during storage. The clinical benefit of transfusions of PCs in PAS-2 was studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PCs prepared from buffy coats were suspended in either plasma or PAS-2 and stored for up to 5 days. Clinical responses were evaluated in a prospective study in 21 patients treated with intensive chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive prophylactic transfusions of PCs prepared in either plasma or PAS-2. Reactions and CCIs were recorded after each transfusion. RESULTS: The incidence of reactions in 12 patients given PCs in plasma (n = 192) was 12 percent. Transfusions to 9 patients of PCs in PAS-2 (n = 132) showed a reduction in the incidence of reactions to 5.3 percent (p<0.05). The average 1-hour and 20-hour CCIs after transfusion of PCs in plasma were 20.7 +/- 8. 5 and 11.5 +/- 8.0, respectively. CCIs after transfusion of PCs in PAS-2 were significantly lower: the average 1-hour CCI was 17.1 +/- 6.6 (p<0.001) and the average 20-hour CCI was 9.5 +/- 7.0 (p<0.05). Storage conditions of PCs were optimal: in each group, average 1-hour CCIs of both fresh and stored PCs were similar. The 20-hour CCIs after the transfusion of fresh and stored PCs in PAS-2 also were similar. CONCLUSION: Transfusion of PCs in PAS-2 significantly reduces the incidence of reactions. The 1-hour and 20-hour CCIs after transfusion of PCs in PAS-2 were significantly lower than the CCIs after transfusion of PCs in plasma. Because storage conditions of both PCs were found to be optimal, the decrease in CCIs after transfusion of PCs prepared in PAS-2 may be caused by rapid elimination of a subpopulation of P-selectin-positive platelets from the circulation.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Evaluation of a strategy to limit blood donor exposure in high risk premature newborns based on clinical estimation of transfusion need.

OBJECTIVES: Reservation of dedicated series of pedipacks, consisting of 3 to 4 units of 70 ml filtered red cell concentrate in additive solution SAGM from 1 donor, may reduce donor exposure. In this prospective efficacy study the benefits, release and expiration of pedipacks (PP) assigned to preterm infants requiring neonatal intensive care are analyzed. METHODS: On the basis of clinical assessment of the need for multiple transfusions, 96 preterm neonates (gestational age < 32 wks and/or birth weight < 1500 g) were assigned to either the high risk group (HRG), who were to receive dedicated donor blood units, or the low risk group (LRG). Inclusion criteria for HRG were 1) estimated time of admission > 21 days and 2) expected need for multiple transfusions due to clinical cardiorespiratory instability, prolonged parental feeding or frequent blood sampling. To reduce wastage of donor blood, dedication of donor blood units was limited to 21 days. RESULTS: 50 series (192 PP) were assigned to 42 HRG infants. Two HRG infants received 3 series, 4 received 2 series and 36 received 1 series of PP. Mean transfusion rate was 3.1 PP in the HRG and 0.4 in the LRG. In the LRG 35 of 54 were not transfused, 19 received 1 to 2 PP. In both groups transfused newborns were exposed to 1.1 donors in average. In the HRG of 192 PP, 137 PP (71%) were used within 21 days, and another 30 (16%) before the expiration date < 35 days. Twenty five PP (13%) expired, mainly because of logistical problems in the introduction phase. CONCLUSION: Assignment of dedicated PP on the basis of clinical parameters at entry considerably reduces donor exposure in HRG. Wastage of dedicated blood transfusions was reduced by limitation of the dedicated period (21 days). In terms of efficacy, reservation and use of PP can be optimized by standardized administrative measures.

Anemia↗

PubMed1999

Differences in residual white blood cell subset counts in buffy coat-depleted red cell concentrates prepared with bottom and top or quadruple-bag systems.

BACKGROUND: For preparation of buffy coat-depleted red cell concentrates (RCCs) in additive solution whole blood is currently collected in The Netherlands both in quadruple-bag and bottom and top bag systems. By using the quadruple-bag system both plasma and buffy coat cells are transferred into integrated satellite bags while the red cells remain in the collection bag. When bottom and top bags are used, the buffy coat remains in the collection bag while both red cells and plasma are transferred into satellite bags. The difference in processing prompted us to perform quantitative analysis of residual WBC subsets in buffy coat-depleted RCCs. Differences in removal of specific cells with the buffy coat could improve the outcome of additional filtration procedures aiming at complete removal of specific WBC subsets. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The buffy coat was removed in semiautomated procedures (Optipress I; Compomat G4) from units of whole blood collected in both bag systems. Paired samples were taken before and after removal of the buffy coat for counting and analyzing WBC subsets by flow cytometry using subset-specific monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: All RCCs met the criteria from the guidelines of the Council of Europe. The percentage of residual total WBCs was lower (p<0.001) in RCCs processed in bottom and top bag systems (26% Compomat and 18% Optipress) as compared to RCCs processed in quadruple-bag systems (43% Compomat). WBC subset analysis in RCCs processed in quadruple-bag systems showed approximately 25% of residual T cells, B cells and monocytes and 60% of residual granulocytes. In contrast, WBC subset analysis in RCCs processed in bottom and top bag systems showed approximately 2% residual T cells, B cells, and monocytes and 35% residual granulocytes; in about 45% of units, lymphocytes and monocytes were even below the detection limit of flow cytometry analysis. CONCLUSION: Buffy coat-depleted RCCs are currently processed in bottom and top bag or quadruple-bag systems, the former being superior to the latter due to selective depletion of lymphocytes and monocytes by 98% (2 logs). The bottom and top procedure is an evident contribution to leukodepletion in blood transfusion, both with and without additional filtration.

Blood Component Removal↗

PubMed1998

Platelets stored in a new-generation container differences between plasma and platelet additive solution II.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In order to preserve platelet concentrates (PCs) with high yields, a new polyolefin platelet storage container (PL 2410, 1.3L, Baxter, La Châtre, France) with increased gas permeability in combination with a larger surface area has been developed. The storage capacity was studied with platelets in plasma and platelets additive solution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Platelet concentrate pools (PCs) of different yields suspended in either plasma (PCs-PL; n = 30) or PAS II (PCs-PAS; n = 37) were prepared. For preparation of PCs with a low, intermediate and high number of platelets 3, 5 and 6 buffy coat (BCs) were pooled with different volumes of plasma and 5 and 6 BCs were pooled with different volumes of PAS II, in order to obtain PCs of equal volumes comparable with routine conditions. All PCs were stored on a flatbed shaker at 22+/-2 degrees C and evaluated on days 1, 2, 5 and 7 by determining platelet and white cell counts, pH (37 degrees C), pO2, pCO2 and swirling score. RESULTS: Platelet yields ranged from 1.5 up to 5.5 x 10(11) platelets/U. On day 7 all PCs-PL (n = 4) with platelet yields above 4.5 x 10(11)/U had a pH value below 6.8 (range 5.91-6.79). While 7 of 8 PCs-PAS units with platelet yields above 4. 0 x 10(11)/U showed a pH value below 6.8 (range 6.31-6.70). CONCLUSION: During 7 days of storage in a new 1.3-liter platelet container, the pH was maintained above 6.8 in PCs in plasma with a yield between 1.5- and 4.5 x 10(11)/U; when PAS II was used, the maximum platelet yield allowed for comparable pH maintenance was somewhat lower (4.0 x 10(11)/U).

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Improvement of platelet storage conditions by using new polyolefin containers.

BACKGROUND: Storage of pooled platelet concentrates (PCs) with yields above 3.0 x 10(11) platelets per unit in a 1-L PL-732 polyolefin container for 5 days often results in a drop in pH to below 6.0. Recently, new oxygen-permeable platelet containers (1-L PL-2410, 1-L and 1.5-L Compoflex) have been developed. The maximal platelet storage capacities of the new containers and the PL-732 were compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Large platelet pools (n = 27) with platelet concentrations between 1.2 and 1.4 x 10(11) per L were made from 3 to 5 PCs prepared from buffy coats. The pools were divided in equal volumes among the PL-732 and the three new platelet containers. Platelet counts in the PCs ranged from 1.0 to 5.0 x 10(11) per unit. All PCs were stored on a flatbed shaker at 22 +/- 2 degrees C and evaluated on Days 1, 3, 5, and 7 by measuring platelet count, pH, pO2, pCO2, HCO3-, glucose, lactate, platelet swirling, and soluble p-selectin. RESULTS: Day 7 storage of PCs (n = 6) with yields between 3.0 and 4.0 x 10(11) platelets in PL-732 showed mean +/- SD pH values of 5.93 +/- 0.05 and lactate values of 32.3 +/- 7.9 mmol per L; in 4 of these 6 PCs, pH was below 6.0. In contrast, storage of these PCs in 1-L PL-2410 and 1.5-L Compoflex containers and of 2 of these 6 PCs in 1-L Compoflex containers showed pH values above 6.8. Lactate values were 15.5 +/- 1.3, 15.3 +/- 1.8, and 19.5 +/- 4.7 mmol per L, respectively (p < 0.001 vs. PL-732). The platelet storage capacity of the new containers with platelet yields between 4.0 and 5.0 x 10(11) per unit (n = 6) was evaluated. Day 7 storage of these PCs in the 1.5-L Compoflex showed an average pH value of 6.74 +/- 0.20; in 2 of 6 PCs, pH was below 6.8. The average pH value in the PL-2410 was 6.38 +/- 0.31, and in all PCs, pH was below 6.8. Average lactate values were 17.8 +/- 5.7 and 25.8 +/- 5.6 mmol per L (p < 0.05), respectively. Soluble p-selectin values on Day 7 of storage increased approximately twofold in all PCs. CONCLUSION: The new oxygen-permeable containers showed platelet quality comparable to that with the PL-732 and for longer storage periods and at higher platelet counts.

Blood Platelets↗

PubMed1996

Evaluation of storage conditions of platelet concentrates prepared from pooled buffy coats.

Five days storage of pooled platelet concentrates (PCs) with high yields often results in a pH fall and poor platelet morphology despite the use of specific containers. In this study we evaluated two techniques for prolonged storage of PCs with high platelet counts, by measuring pH and platelet swirl. In routine procedures, 90 PCs, prepared from five buffy coats, were stored in a single 1-litre PL 732 container. After 5 days storage, 51 PCs with platelet counts below 3.1 x 10(11)/U showed a pH above 6.8 and optimal swirling scores. 29 of 39 PCs (74%) with yields above 3.1 x 10(11)/U showed pH values below 6.8 and poor swirling scores. These poor results can be prevented by shortening the duration of storage. PCs with high yields can be stored for 5 days either by dividing the concentrate into two containers or by adjusting the platelet count to 3.1 x 10(11)/U. In the latter procedure, we reduced the volume of the concentrate and found that of 102 PCs, only 9 showed poor values for pH and platelet swirl. The data clearly indicate the importance of measuring the prestorage platelet count to select the optimal procedure for concentrate storage.

Blood Platelets↗