PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jörgen Bruhn

Publications and source records attributed to Jörgen Bruhn.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A-line, bispectral index, and estimated effect-site concentrations: a prediction of clinical end-points of anesthesia.

Autoregressive modeling with exogenous input of middle-latency auditory evoked potentials (A-Line AEP index, AAI) has been developed for monitoring depth of anesthesia. We investigated the prediction of recovery and dose-response relationship of desflurane and AAI or bispectral index (BIS) values. Twenty adult men scheduled for radical prostatectomy were recruited. To minimize opioid effects, analgesia was provided by a concurrent epidural in addition to the general anesthetic. Electrodes for AAI and BIS monitoring and a headphone for auditory stimuli were applied. Propofol and remifentanil were used for anesthetic induction. Maintenance of anesthesia was with desflurane only. For comparison to AAI and BIS monitor parameters, pharmacokinetic models for desflurane and propofol distribution and effect-site concentrations were used to predict clinical end-points (Prediction probability P(K)). Patients opened their eyes at an AAI value of 47 +/- 20 and a BIS value of 77 +/- 14 (mean +/- sd), and the prediction probability for eye opening was P(K) = 0.81 for AAI, P(K) = 0.89 for BIS, and P(K) = 0.91 for desflurane effect-site concentration. The opening of eyes was best predicted by the calculated desflurane effect-site concentration. The relationship between predicted desflurane effect-site concentration versus AAI and BIS was calculated by nonlinear regression analysis (r = 0.75 for AAI and r = 0.80 for BIS). The correlation between BIS and clinical end-points of anesthesia or the desflurane effect-compartment concentration is better than for the AAI.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Spectral entropy and bispectral index as measures of the electroencephalographic effects of propofol.

Recently, Datex-Ohmeda introduced the Entropy Moduletrade mark for measuring depth of anesthesia. Based on the Shannon entropy of the electroencephalogram, state entropy (SE) and response entropy (RE) are computed. We investigated the dose-response relationship of SE and RE during propofol anesthesia in comparison with the Bispectral Indextrade mark (BIS). Twenty patients were studied without surgical stimulus. Anesthesia was induced by a constant propofol infusion of 2000 mg/h (451 +/- 77 microg x min(-1) x kg(-1)) via a large forearm vein. Propofol was infused until substantial burst suppression occurred (more than 50%) or mean arterial blood pressure decreased to <60 mm Hg. Hereafter, infusions were stopped until recovery of BIS values up to 60 was reached. Subsequently, the constant propofol infusion of 2000 mg/h was restarted to increase depth of anesthesia and again decreased (infusion was stopped) within the BIS value range of 40-60. The coefficient of determination (R2) and the prediction probability (P(K)) were calculated to evaluate the performance of SE, RE, and BIS to predict changing propofol effect-site concentrations. R2 values for SE, RE, and BIS of 0.88 +/- 0.08, 0.89 +/- 0.07, and 0.92 +/- 0.06, respectively, were similar. The calculated P(K) values, however, revealed a significant difference between SE and RE compared with BIS, with P(K) = 0.77 +/- 0.09, 0.76 +/- 0.10, and 0.84 +/- 0.06, respectively. BIS seems to show slight advantages in predicting propofol effect-site concentrations compared with SE and RE, as measured by P(K) but not as measured by R2.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Narcotrend or bispectral index monitoring during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia: a comparison with a standard practice protocol.

UNLABELLED: Bispectral Index (BIS) (Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA) and Narcotrend (MonitorTechnik, Bad Bramstedt, Germany) are monitoring devices that were, as others, designed to assess the depth of anesthesia. Meanwhile, a number of studies indicate that with total IV anesthesia, BIS and Narcotrend have comparable effects on drug consumption and recovery times whereas comparative clinical data for volatile anesthetics are still missing. Therefore, we designed the present prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study to compare the effects of BIS and Narcotrend monitoring during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia and versus a standard anesthetic practice protocol. One-hundred-twenty adult patients scheduled for minor orthopedic surgery were randomized to receive a desflurane-remifentanil anesthetic controlled either by Narcotrend or by BIS or solely by clinical variables. Anesthesia was induced with 0.4 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) remifentanil and 2 mg/kg propofol. After tracheal intubation, remifentanil was infused at a constant rate of 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) whereas desflurane in 1.5 L/min O(2)/air was adjusted according to clinical variables or the following target values: during maintenance of anesthesia to a value of "D(0)" (Narcotrend) or "50" (BIS), 15 min before the end of surgery to "C(1)" (Narcotrend) or "60" (BIS), whereas in the standard protocol group, desflurane was controlled according to clinical variables, e.g., heart rate, arterial blood pressure, movements. Recovery times and desflurane consumption were recorded by a blinded investigator. The desflurane vaporizer was weighed before and after anesthesia and consumption per minute was calculated. Data are mean +/- sd. The groups were comparable for demographic data, duration of anesthesia, and mean remifentanil dosages. Compared with standard practice, patients with Narcotrend or BIS monitoring needed significantly less desflurane (standard practice 443 +/- 71 mg/min, Narcotrend 374 +/- 124 mg/min, BIS monitoring 416 +/- 99 mg/min desflurane [both P < 0.05]). However, recovery times were not significantly different between the groups, e.g., opening of eyes 4.7 +/- 2.2 versus 3.7 +/- 2.0 versus 4.2 +/- 2.1 min. During desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia, Narcotrend and BIS monitoring seem to be equally effective compared with standard anesthetic practice: BIS and Narcotrend allow for a small reduction of desflurane consumption whereas recovery times are only slightly reduced. IMPLICATIONS: Monitoring the electroencephalogram with Narcotrend or Bispectral Index during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia only slightly reduces recovery times when compared with a standard practice protocol.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

The correlation of the bispectral index with propofol effect site concentrations is not altered by epochs indicated as artefact-loaded by narcotrend.

OBJECTIVE: Artefact detection is an essential feature of automatic EEG monitoring systems used in anaesthesia. Clinical experience indicates that Narcotrend monitoring (MonitorTechnik, Bad Bramstedt, Germany, version 4.0) excludes more EEG epochs because of artefacts than bispectral index monitoring (BIS, Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA, version XP). Whether this increased exclusion of epochs is justified has not been investigated yet. METHODS: Eighteen adult patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were investigated. Induction of anaesthesia was performed with a fentanyl bolus and a propofol infusion. Additionally, following intubation patients received 15 ml bupivacaine 0.5% epidurally. After a waiting period of 45 min depth of anaesthesia was varied two times by increasing and decreasing propofol concentrations. Narcotrend index, BIS values and calculated propofol effect site concentrations were automatically recorded at intervals of 5 s. We tested the hypothesis whether exclusion of artefacts detected by the Narcotrend monitor would possibly improve the prediction probability of the BIS monitor, justifying the necessity of artefact suppression. RESULTS: Simulated propofol effect site concentrations ranged from 2 microg/ml to 6 microg/ml. The Narcotrend monitor excluded a significantly higher percentage of epochs because of artefact detection (12.6 + 1.0%) than the BIS monitor (0.4 +/- 0.1%). The performance of BIS as an indicator of predicted propofol effect site concentrations did not differ when including (P(K) = 0.86 +/- 0.05) or excluding (P(K) = 0.85 +/- 0.04) the data pairs where Narcotrend monitor but not BIS monitor indicated an artefact. Artefacts were evenly distributed over the investigated range ofpropofol effect site concentrations. CONCLUSION: Exclusion of data pairs that were detected as artefacts by Narcotrend but not by BIS did not change the performance of bispectral index as an indicator of propofol effect site concentration.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this investigation was to describe the pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil for probability of no response to shaking and shouting, probability of no response to laryngoscopy, Bispectral Index (BIS), and electroencephalographic approximate entropy (AE). METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers received either propofol or remifentanil alone and then concurrently with a fixed concentration of remifentanil or propofol, respectively, via a target-controlled infusion. Responses to shaking and shouting and to laryngoscopy were assessed multiple times after allowing for plasma effect site equilibration. The raw electroencephalogram and BIS were recorded throughout the study, and AE was calculated off-line. Response surfaces were fit to the clinical response data using logistic regression or hierarchical response models. Response surfaces were also estimated for BIS and AE. Surfaces were visualized using three-dimensional rotations. Model parameters were estimated with NONMEM. RESULTS: Remifentanil alone had no appreciable effect on response to shaking and shouting or response to laryngoscopy. Propofol could ablate both responses. Modest remifentanil concentrations dramatically reduced the concentrations of propofol required to ablate both responses. The hierarchical response surface described the data better than empirical logistic regression. BIS and AE are more sensitive to propofol than to remifentanil. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil alone is ineffective at ablating response to stimuli but demonstrates potent synergy with propofol. BIS and AE values corresponding to 95% probability of ablating response are influenced by the combination of propofol and remifentanil to achieve this endpoint, with higher propofol concentrations producing lower values for BIS and AE.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Application of Bispectral Index and Narcotrend index to the measurement of the electroencephalographic effects of isoflurane with and without burst suppression.

BACKGROUND: The Narcotrend monitor (MonitorTechnik, Bad Bramstedt, Germany) has recently been introduced as an intraoperative monitor of anesthetic state, based on a classification scheme originally developed for visual assessment of the electroencephalogram. The authors compared the performance of the Narcotrend index (software version 4.0) to the Bispectral Index (BIS, version XP; Aspect Medical Systems, Natick, MA) as electroencephalographic measures of isoflurane drug effect during general anesthesia. METHODS: The authors observed 15 adult patients scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy with a combined epidural-isoflurane general anesthesia technique. At least 45 min after induction of general anesthesia, during a phase of constant surgical stimulation, end-tidal isoflurane concentrations were varied between 0.5 and 2.0 multiples of minimum alveolar concentration, and the BIS and the Narcotrend index were recorded. The prediction probability (PK) was calculated for the BIS and the Narcotrend index to predict isoflurane effect compartment concentration for each measure. The correlation analysis of the BIS and the Narcotrend index with the isoflurane effect compartment concentration was obtained by pharmacodynamic modeling based on two sigmoidal curves to account for the discontinuity in both indices with the onset of burst suppression. RESULTS: The prediction probabilities were indistinguishable (BIS PK = 0.72 +/- 0.07 (mean +/- SD); range, 0.61-0.84; Narcotrend index PK = 0.72 +/- 0.10; range, 0.51-0.87), as were the correlations between the electroencephalographic measures and isoflurane effect compartment concentrations (BIS R = 0.82 +/- 0.12; Narcotrend index R = 0.85 +/- 0.09). The pharmacodynamic models for the BIS and the Narcotrend index yielded nearly identical results. CONCLUSIONS: The BIS and the Narcotrend index detected the electroencephalographic effects of isoflurane equally. Combining two fractional sigmoid Emax models adequately described the data before and after the onset of burst suppression.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Spectral entropy and bispectral index as measures of the electroencephalographic effects of sevoflurane.

BACKGROUND: Recently, entropy algorithms have been proposed as electroencephalographic measures of anesthetic drug effects. Datex-Ohmeda (Helsinki, Finland) introduced the Entropy Module, a new electroencephalographic monitor designed for measuring depth of anesthesia. The monitor calculates a state entropy (SE) computed over the frequency range of 0.8-32 Hz and a response entropy (RE) computed over the frequency range of 0.8-47 Hz. The authors investigated the dose-response relation of SE and RE during sevoflurane anesthesia in comparison with the Bispectral Index (BIS). METHODS: Sixteen patients were studied without surgical stimulus. Anesthesia was induced by sevoflurane inhalation with a tight-fitting facemask. Sevoflurane concentrations were increased and subsequently decreased and increased two to four times until the measurement was stopped and patients were intubated for surgery. The performances of SE, RE, and BIS to predict the estimated sevoflurane effect site concentration, obtained by simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling, were compared by calculating the correlation coefficients and the prediction probability. RESULTS: State entropy, RE, and BIS values decreased continuously over the observed concentration range of sevoflurane. Correlation coefficients were slightly but not significantly better for entropy parameters (0.87 +/- 0.09 and 0.86 +/- 0.10 for SE and RE, respectively) than for BIS (0.85 +/- 0.12). Calculating the prediction probability confirmed these results with a prediction probability of 0.84 +/- 0.05 and 0.82 +/- 0.06 for SE and RE, respectively, and 0.80 +/- 0.06 for BIS. CONCLUSION: State entropy and RE seem to be useful electroencephalographic measures of sevoflurane drug effect.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Narcotrend index versus bispectral index as electroencephalogram measures of anesthetic drug effect during propofol anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: The Narcotrend monitor (MonitorTechnik, Bad Bramstedt, Germany) performs an automatic analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) during anesthesia based on a visual assessment of the raw EEG. Its newest software version 4.0 includes a dimensionless index that, similar to the bispectral index (BIS), ranges from 100 (awake) to 0. We compared the performance of Narcotrend index and BIS as EEG measures of anesthetic drug effect during propofol anesthesia. Eighteen adult patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy were investigated. An epidural catheter was placed in the lumbar space and electrodes for BIS (version XP; Aspect Medical Systems, Natick, MA) and Narcotrend were positioned as recommended by the manufacturers. Narcotrend index, BIS values, and propofol plasma and effect site concentrations as parallelly simulated by Rugloop software (Department of Anesthesia, Ghent University, Belgium) were automatically recorded in intervals of 5 s. Induction of anesthesia consisted of a fentanyl bolus and a propofol infusion. After endotracheal intubation, patients received 15 mL bupivacaine 0.5% epidurally, and 45 min later propofol dosages were subsequently increased and decreased twice. Simulated propofol effect site concentrations ranged from 2.0 +/- 0.4 microg/mL (smallest) to 6.3 +/- 1.3 microg/mL (largest) during these subsequent increases and decreases of propofol. In terms of prediction probability (P(K)) the performance of the Narcotrend index (P(K) = 0.88 +/- 0.03) to predict propofol effect site concentrations was comparable to the BIS (P(K) = 0.85 +/- 0.04). Using the respective EEG index as a measure of drug effect the mean k(e0) was calculated as 0.20 +/- 0.05 min(-1) for Narcotrend index and 0.16 +/- 0.07 min(-1) for BIS. In the observed propofol concentration range Narcotrend index detected differences in EEG dynamics as well as BIS. IMPLICATIONS: This study in 18 adult patients undergoing radical prostatectomy describes the relationship between Narcotrend index and bispectral index versus predicted propofol effect compartment concentrations. In terms of prediction probability, the performance of the Narcotrend index and the bispectral index to predict propofol effect site concentrations was comparable.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

A manual slide rule for target-controlled infusion of propofol: development and evaluation.

UNLABELLED: We describe the development and evaluation of a simple slide rule that enables the bedside determination of the infusion rate for a particular target plasma concentration of propofol. The infusion rate to reach this target concentration at time (t) is the product of the target concentration, body weight, and a correction factor that depends on the time elapsed from the start of the initial infusion. Our target-controlled infusion (TCI) slide rule, constructed along this principle, performs the multiplications, analogous to the principle of the classical slide rule, as addition of logarithms. We calculated the percentage deviation of the predicted concentration obtained by STANPUMP versus predicted concentrations obtained using the infusion rates determined from the TCI slide rule. The evaluation using STANPUMP simulations showed, for a constant target concentration of 3 micro g/mL of propofol, a mean deviation of 4.05% (max, 6.97%) in the first 15 min and a mean deviation of 0.5% (max, 2.03%) between 16 and 300 min. The mean deviation after changing the target from 3 micro g/mL to 1, 2, 4, or 5 micro g/mL ranged from 1.15% to 17.76%. This pocket-sized TCI slide rule combines the advantages of minimal financial and technical cost with reasonable accuracy. IMPLICATIONS: We describe the development and evaluation of a simple slide rule that enables the bedside determination of the required infusion rate for a particular target plasma concentration. This pocket-sized target-controlled infusion slide rule combines the advantages of minimal financial and technical cost with reasonable accuracy.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2003

Correlation of approximate entropy, bispectral index, and spectral edge frequency 95 (SEF95) with clinical signs of "anesthetic depth" during coadministration of propofol and remifentanil.

BACKGROUND: Several studies relating electroencephalogram parameter values to clinical endpoints using a single (mostly hypnotic) drug at relatively low levels of central nervous system depression (sedation) have been published. However, the usefulness of a parameter derived from the electroencephalogram for clinical anesthesia largely depends on its ability to predict the response to stimuli of different intensity or painfulness under a combination of a hypnotic and an (opioid) analgesic. This study was designed to evaluate the predictive performance of spectral edge frequency 95 (SEF95), BIS, and approximate entropy for the response to increasingly intense stimuli under different concentrations of both propofol and remifentanil in the therapeutic range. METHODS: Ten healthy male and ten healthy female volunteers were studied during coadministration of propofol and remifentanil. After having maintained a specific target concentration for 10 min, the depth of sedation-anesthesia was assessed using the responsiveness component of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) rating scale, which was modified by adding insertion of a laryngeal mask and laryngoscopy. The electroencephalogram derived parameters approximate entropy, bispectral index, and SEF95 were recorded just before sedation level was assessed. RESULTS: The prediction probability values for approximate entropy were slightly, but not significantly, better than those for bispectral index, SEF95, and the combination of drug concentrations. A much lower prediction ability was observed for tolerance of airway manipulation than for hypnotic endpoints. CONCLUSION: Approximate entropy revealed informations on hypnotic and analgesic endpoints using coadministration of propofol and remifentanil comparable to bispectral index, SEF95, and the combination of drug concentrations.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Artifact robustness, inter- and intraindividual baseline stability, and rational EEG parameter selection.

BACKGROUND: Artifact robustness (i.e., size of deviation of an electroencephalographic parameter value from baseline caused by artifacts) and baseline stability (i.e., consistency of median baseline values) of electroencephalographic parameters profoundly influence electroencephalography-based pharmacodynamic parameter estimation and the usefulness of the processed electroencephalogram as measure of the arousal state of the central nervous system (depth of anesthesia). In this study, the authors compared the artifact robustness and the interindividual and intraindividual baseline stability of several univariate descriptors of the electroencephalogram (Shannon entropy, approximate entropy, spectral edge frequency 95, delta ratio, and canonical univariate parameter). METHODS: Electroencephalographic data of 16 healthy volunteers before and after administration of an intravenous bolus of propofol (2 mg/kg body weight) were analyzed. Each volunteer was studied twice. The baseline electroencephalogram was recorded for a median of 18 min before drug administration. For each electroencephalographic descriptor, the authors calculated the following: (1) baseline variability (= (median baseline - median effect) [i.e., signal]/SD baseline [i.e., noise]) without artifact rejection; (2) baseline variability with artifact rejection; and (3) baseline stability within and between individuals (= (median baseline - median effect) averaged over all volunteers/SD of all median baselines). RESULTS: Without artifact rejection, Shannon entropy and canonical univariate parameter displayed the highest signal-to-noise ratio. After artifact rejection, approximate entropy, Shannon entropy, and the canonical univariate parameter displayed the highest signal-to-noise ratio. Baseline stability within and between individuals was highest for approximate entropy. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to robustness against artifacts, the electroencephalographic entropy parameters and the canonical univariate parameter were superior to spectral edge frequency 95 and delta ratio. Electroencephalographic approximate entropy displayed the best interindividual and intraindividual baseline stability.

Adult↗