PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J-J Lefrère

Publications and source records attributed to J-J Lefrère.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

[Application of pre- and post-transfusion virological controls prior to the suppression of their recommendation].

In 1996, due to a residual risk of transfusion-transmitted virus, a circular of the French Health Authorities (DGS/DH n degrees 96-609) recommended proposing to recipients of cellular blood products a test for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and for antibodies to hepatitis C virus, before and three months after transfusion. We have evaluated the application of this recommendation throughout the whole transfused population of a French Hospital over a three month period. In addition, this study allowed us to establish the vaccination status against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in this exposed population including transfusion and nosocomial risks. The results showed a failure in the application of the 1996 circular and confirmed the validity of the abrogation of this circular by a recent circular (11 January 2006) of the French health authorities. It also showed that only a minority of patients needing a vaccination against HBV were afforded such treatment during their hospitalization.

Blood Transfusion↗
PubMed2006

[Safety of blood products and B19 parvovirus].

More than 25 years after the discovery of the parvovirus B19 (B19), the issue of the safety of blood components and the screening of this virus in blood donations is still debated. Although more often transmitted by respiratory route, B19 may also be transmitted by transfusion of blood components. This risk of exposure has been estimated to a frequency ranging from 1/625 to 1/50,000, according to the sensitivity of the detection methods and to seasonal epidemiologic circumstances. Usually, B19 is responsible for benign pathologies. However, such an infection can have a serious clinical outcome in three categories of susceptible recipients: (i) patients with shortened red cell survival (thalassemia major, sickle cell disease, other hemolytic diseases); (ii) immunocompromised patients (previously exposed to B19 or not) (iii) and pregnant women (not previously exposed the B19), with a risk of hydrops fetalis or of intrauterine death. Selected blood components, not collected during the short but highly viremic pre-seroconversion phase, could be reserved for these three groups of at-risk recipients. The screening of such viremic donations could be performed with nucleic acid testing (NAT), but an alternate strategy could be the selection of B19 immunised donors far from the primo-infection (positive for B19 IgG and negative for B19 IgM, or only positive for IgG at two controls distant of several months). However, the existence of persistently B19-infected individuals carrying B19 DNA despite the presence of specific IgG (estimated at 1% of blood donors) could constitute a potential threat for transfused immunocompromised recipients. The screening of such donors, which could be performed through a very highly sensitive NAT, would be justified only if the infectivity of such blood donations is demonstrated. If not, a screening of blood donors positive for B19 IgG would be a sufficient preventive measure.

Blood Donors↗
PubMed2005

[Electronic learning: interactive learning in medicine or Socrates in electronic guise].

E-learning has been widely used for training in different fields. More recently, it was introduced during medical studies or for continuous medical education. The Canadian Universities are pioneers in e-learning creating special departments dedicated to pedagogy. Developing countries like Brazil or Central Europe have made some pilot experiments, which were successful. Several electronic companies have given a free access to the programmes and sites. The use of electronic media leads to an adaptation of teaching methods making them more interactive.

CD-I↗
PubMed2004

[French training program for medical students in transfusion medicine. Transfusion Medicine Teachers' College].

In France, transfusion medicine training program has been updated. A national committee of professors in transfusion medicine propose a series of 13 items which represent the minimum knowledge that general practitioners should possess. This overview of transfusion medicine is far below the level that specialists should reach and they will need an additional specialized training. Several French universities have set up their own training program which is quite similar to the work of the committee of professors. The following recommendations are not strict guidelines but is a common basis which will be improved in 2005 according to new evidence based transfusion medicine.

Accidents, Occupational↗