PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J-P Armand

Publications and source records attributed to J-P Armand.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

[Targeting angiogenesis in oncology].

Advances in biology have lead to the characterization of the molecular mechanisms underlying angiogenesis, a crucial process of tumor growth. Tumor cells secrete various growth factors, including VEGF, which activate endothelial cells to form new blood vessels. Numerous drugs, at present in clinical development, interfere with the molecular mediators of angiogenesis. The death of neovessels achieved by some of such compounds allows reduction in tumor size. This review describes many angiogenesic inhibitors which mechanisms of action are quite diverse.

Angiogenesis Inducing Agents↗
PubMed2004

Dose-dense regimen of temozolomide given every other week in patients with primary central nervous system tumors.

BACKGROUND: Temozolomide has shown activity and limited toxicity in patients with primary brain tumors at doses of 150-200 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 every 4 weeks. In this study, a new alternative dose-dense regimen of temozolomide was explored in patients with recurrent brain tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, we evaluated the safety, dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, recommended dose and activity of temozolomide given on days 1-3 and 14-16 every 28 days (one cycle). The starting daily dose was 200 mg/m(2) in a group of at least six patients, with subsequent increments of 50 mg/m(2) in groups of at least 12 patients until unacceptable toxicity was reached. Oral ondansetron (8 mg) was given 1 h prior to temozolomide administration. McDonald's criteria were used to evaluate antitumor activity. RESULTS: Seventy patients with brain tumors entered this study. The median number of prior chemotherapy treatments was two (range 1-3). Patients were assigned to one of four groups to receive temozolomide at daily doses of 200 (seven patients), 250 (13 patients), 300 (38 patients) and 350 mg/m(2)/day (12 patients). The absence of dose-limiting toxicity at cycle 1 led us to establish dose recommendations based on toxicity after repeated cycles. A total of 23, 72, 192 and 83 cycles were given at daily doses of 200, 250, 300 and 350 mg/m(2), respectively. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 0/7, 1/13, 5/38 and 4/12 patients treated at doses of 200, 250, 300 and 350 mg/m(2)/day, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 1/7, 0/13, 3/38 and 4/12 patients treated with 200, 250, 300 and 350 mg/m(2)/day temozolomide, respectively. At a dose of 350 mg/m(2), sustained grade 2-3 thrombocytopenia did not allow treatment to be resumed at day 14 in >40% of patients, and this dose was considered to be the maximum tolerated dose. Thus, a dose of 300 mg/m(2)/day that was associated with <20% treatment delay due to sustained hematological toxicity was considered as the recommended dose. Objective responses were reported in 13 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Temozolomide can be given safely using a dose-dense regimen of 300 mg/m(2)/day for 3 consecutive days every 2 weeks in patients with recurrent brain tumors.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Nasopharyngeal carcinomas: an update.

Among the group of head and neck cancers, nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC) represent a distinct entity in terms of their epidemiology, clinical presentation, biological markers, carcinogenic risk factors, prognostic factors, treatment and outcome. Undifferentiated NPC (UCNT), the most frequent histological type, is endemic in certain regions, especially in South East Asia. The disease has also been associated with the presence of the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). Although NPC is a radiosensitive and chemosensitive tumour, a substantial number of patients develop local recurrence or distant metastases. For patients with locoregional advanced disease, it is well known that conventional radiotherapy is insufficient in terms of both the local control rates and distant metastases. New techniques of radiation and new combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy modalities have been evaluated in numerous clinical trials in recent years. The purpose of this article is to review the current knowledge in terms of the epidemiology, biology, prognosis, management and outcome of patients with NPC.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2003

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the new vinca alkaloid vinflunine administered as a 10-min infusion every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: Vinflunine is a novel vinca alkaloid obtained by semi-synthesis using super-acidic chemistry to selectively introduce two fluorine atoms at the 20' position of vinorelbine. In human tumour xenografts, vinflunine showed definite antitumour activity in seven out of 11 tumours tested compared with three out of 11 for vinorelbine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I study, vinflunine was administered to 31 patients with advanced malignancies as a 10-min i.v. infusion every 3 weeks according to an escalating schedule of doses between 30 and 400 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicities were assessed and, at 400 mg/m(2), three out of five patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. At the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), i.e. 400 mg/m(2), the toxicity profile of vinflunine consisted mainly of mucositis, constipation and neutropenia of short duration. Vinflunine area under the curve increased as a proportion of the administered dose whereas no saturation of elimination was observed. CONCLUSION: The MTD of vinflunine was achieved at 400 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. According to protocol rules, the recommended dose was established at 350 mg/m(2). A preliminary assessment of first patients included in early phase II trials led to reduction of the recommended dose to 320 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for further development of vinflunine. Three partial responses (two in breast carcinoma, one in renal cell carcinoma) suggest that activity is likely to be seen in less heavily pretreated patient populations.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Scientific review of EORTC trials: the functioning of the New Treatment Committee and Protocol Review Committee.

New anticancer treatments (new therapeutic strategies or new compounds) require careful development in which cancer clinical trials are an essential element. Two scientific committees, namely the New Treatment Committee and the Protocol Review Committee, ensure the review of all EORTC protocols with respect to the interest and originality, methodology, feasibility and relevance within the EORTC framework. Both Committees are involved early in the evaluation of the new concept proposal and follow all aspects (methodology, administrative, regulatory) of the protocol development process. Throughout its 25 years of existence, the Protocol Review Committee has streamlined drug and protocol evaluations and has developed standard operating procedures to handle those reviews in a very efficient and fast manner. Since 1997, the New Treatment Committee has contributed to strengthening the EORTC during the development process with the aim of ensuring an optimal flow of information on new drugs between laboratory and clinical research divisions.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed2002

Phase I-II and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the toxicity profile, the recommended dose (RD) and the pharmacokinetic parameters, and to evaluate the antitumor activity of gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ovarian carcinoma (OC). METHODS: Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-min infusion followed by a 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin, repeated every 2 weeks. Doses of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin ranged from 800 to 1500 and 70 to 100 mg/m(2), respectively. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (26 males, 18 females; median age 55 years) including 35 NSCLC (five platinum pretreated) and nine OC patients (all platinum pretreated) received a total of 355 cycles. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. No dose-limiting toxicity at any dose level occurred during the first two cycles; therefore, the highest dose-level of gemcitabine (1500 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) was considered as the RD. Hematological toxicity was moderate amongst the 22 patients treated (167 cycles) at that dose level. Thirteen cycles were associated with grade 3-4 non-febrile neutropenia in six patients, and eight cycles with grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in two patients. Other toxicities were mild to moderate, consisting of asthenia and peripheral neurotoxicity. Four of the 35 patients treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) experienced grade 3 neurotoxicity requiring treatment discontinuation at cycle 10. In the range of the doses used, gemcitabine and its main metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine appeared not to be affected by oxaliplatin 70-100 mg/m(2). Of the 44 patients evaluable for activity, 12 NSCLC patients experienced objective responses (one complete and 11 partial responses) and three OC patients showed tumor stabilization lasting for 6 months with a 50% decrease of CA 125 level. Two partial responses (NSCLC) and one tumor stabilization (OC) occurred in platinum-resistant patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin could be safely administered on an out-patient schedule in patients with advanced NSCLC and OC. The RD was gemcitabine 1500 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks. Promising antitumor activity was reported in patients with NSCLC and platinum-pretreated OC, and thus, deserves further evaluation.

Adenocarcinoma↗