PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J-P Favre

Publications and source records attributed to J-P Favre.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

[Anisakiasis: an infestation to be known by surgeons].

BACKGROUND: Anisakis infestation is related to the consumption of raw or undercooked fish. It can cause allergic reactions, or abdominal pain when the gastrointestinal tube is involved. Its incidence is rising in Europe. OBJECTIVE: To analyze a group of patients complaining of right iliac fossa pain with ileitis or colitis and establish its relationship with Anisakis spp. infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 3-months period, 28 patients with abdominal pain were referred to the hospital with a diagnosis of ileitis or colitis by imaging, endoscopy or surgery. Specific serology for Anisakis was performed in all of them. RESULTS: At imaging study, 14 patients had ileitis or colitis, three intestinal obstruction and one acute appendicitis. Fourteen patients were operated on and 7 of them underwent resection; histopathologic diagnosis were eosinophilic ileitis (2 cases) or colitis (3 cases), non specific ileitis (1 case) and Crohn's disease (1 case). Another patient had an endoscopic biopsy that concluded eosinophilic colitis. Anisakis serology was positive in 25 (89%), negative in two and unknown in one. All patients were discharged uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS: Digestive anisakiasis may present as acute abdomen. Surgeons should know and consider this diagnosis in patients with ileitis or colitis, moreover if an antecedent of raw or undercooked fish ingestion is present. A conservative approach is best performed but the clinical picture can require an emergent laparotomy.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2003

Anatomical basis for the interposition of a gastric pouch between the ileum and the anus after total proctocolectomy.

After a total proctocolectomy, ileoanal continuity is achieved by an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. This anastomosis is not possible when the ileum cannot reach the anus. To avoid definitive ileostomy in this circumstance, we devised a gastric pouch, taken from the left half of the vertical portion of the stomach, vascularized by the right gastroepiploic pedicle, then interposed it between the ileum and the anus. The aim of this anatomical study on seven cadavers was to estimate the capacity of this gastric pouch to reach the anus. The distance between the caudal edge of the pubic symphysis and the apex of the pouch was measured. It is accepted that an ileal pouch always reaches the anus without tension if it comes down 6 cm below the caudal edge of the pubic symphysis. The apex of the gastric pouch reached a mean of 13.3 cm (range 10-18 cm) below the caudal edge of the pubic symphysis. This technique was then performed on four patients. The apex of the gastric pouch reached a mean of 12.5 cm (range 10-14 cm) below the caudal edge of the pubic symphysis and always reached the anus. These findings emphasize that a gastric pouch interposed between the ileum and the anus after a total proctocolectomy has an excellent capacity to reach the anus without tension.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2003

[Perforation and rupture of the oesophagus: treatment and prognosis].

AIM OF THE STUDY: To analyze treatment and prognosis of perforations and ruptures of the oesophagus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 40 patients (26 men and 14 women; mean age = 59 +/- 17 years) with a perforation or a rupture of the oesophagus. Seven perforations were cervical: iatrogenic (n = 6) or following ingestion of a foreign body (n = 1). Thirty-three perforations were thoracic: iatrogenic (n = 15), spontaneous rupture (n = 14), following ingestion of foreign body (n = 3) or traumatic (n = 1). All patients with cervical perforations were operated on (suture or drainage). One patient with thoracic perforation died before surgery, 2 underwent non-operative treatment and 30 were operated on. Twenty-eight underwent an oesophageal procedure: suture (n = 13), oesophagectomy (n = 11) or double exclusion (n = 4). Two uderwent surgery without oesophageal procedure (one pleural decortication, and one ablation of a pleural foreign body). RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 17% (7/40), 21% (3/14) after spontaneous ruptures and 19% (4/21) after iatrogenic perforations (no death for other aetiologies). The mortality rate was 14% (1/7) for cervical lesions and 18% (6/33) for thoracic ones. It was 8% (1/13) after intrathoracic suture, 18% (2/11) after oesophagectomy and 50% (2/4) after double exclusion. CONCLUSION: Iatrogenic perforation and spontaneous rupture had the same poor prognosis. Non-surgical treatment is rarely indicated. oesophagectomy is a good option in case of non suturable oesophagus or delayed operation.

Adult↗