PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J-R Delpero

Publications and source records attributed to J-R Delpero.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

[Locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Chemoradiotherapy, reevaluation and secondary resection].

UNLABELLED: Induction chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may downstage locally advanced pancreatic tumors but secondary resections are unfrequent. However some responders' patients may benefit of a R0 resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report 18 resections among 29 locally advanced pancreatic cancers; 15 patients were treated with neoadjuvant 5-FU-cisplatin based (13) or taxotere based (2 patients) chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy), and 3 patients without histologically proven adenocarcinoma were resected without any preoperative treatment. RESULTS: The morbidity rate was 28% and the mortality rate was 7%; one patient died after resection (5.5%) and one died after exploration (9%). The R0 resection rate was 50%. The median survival for the resected patients was not reached and the actuarial survival at 3 years was 59%. Two specimens showed no residual tumor and the two patients were alive at 15 and 46 months without recurrence; one specimen showed less than 10% viable tumoral cells and the patient was alive at 36 months without recurrence. A mesenteric infarction was the cause of a late death at 3 years in a disease free patient (radiation induced injury of the superior mesenteric artery). The median survival of the 11 non-resected patients was 21 months and the actuarial survival at 2 years was 0%. When the number of the resected patients (18) was reported to the entire cohort of the patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated during the same period in our institution, the secondary resectability rate was 9%. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy identifies poor surgical candidates through observation and may enhance the margin status of patients undergoing secondary resection for locally advanced tumors. However it remains difficult to evaluate the results in the literature because of the variations in the definitions of resectability. The best therapeutic strategy remains to be defined, because the majority of patients ultimately succumb with distant metastatic disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

[Pelvic posterior exenteration with immediate colo-rectal anastomosis: is it justified and feasible in advanced stage ovarian carcinoma?].

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to show that the removal of the rectum is not an obstacle to implement an optimal surgery in advanced epithelial cancer of the ovary. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study on a population of 44 women with advanced epithelial cancer of the ovary. The surgery was realized between January 95 and July 03, and all surgeries required a posterior exenteration. This treatment was completed by chemotherapy for 36 of them. RESULTS: The median survival of this population is 36.6 months. 6/44 patients (13.6%) had post-operative complications. The completion of chemotherapy started after an average of 5.2 weeks after surgery. All the assessable patients (43/44) have an anal satisfactory continence. CONCLUSION: The posterior exenteration, when it's necessary, for advanced epithelial cancer of the ovary must not be an obstacle to obtain an optimal surgery. Anal continence is respected and there are no more complications. This surgical act is safe for the management of this pathology without delaying the others therapeutics and allowing a satisfactory quality of life.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

EGFR in colorectal cancer: more than a simple receptor.

BACKGROUND: Advances in the understanding of tumor biology have led to the development of targeted therapies allowing progress in colorectal cancer treatment. One of the most promising targets is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). METHOD: The presence and distribution of high- and low-affinity EGFR was investigated retrospectively in a group of 82 colorectal cancer samples (43 normal colon-colon cancer paired samples) using a specific ligand binding assay (Scatchard Analysis). FINDINGS: A large majority of tumor samples exhibited one class of high-affinity binding sites (78%). Eighteen cases (22%) exhibited both high- and low-affinity binding sites. A wide interpatient variability was observed for the site number, with physiologically-relevant high-affinity sites ranging from 7 to 310 fmol/mg protein in tumors and from 6 to 313 fmol/mg protein in normal mucosa. A significant positive correlation was demonstrated between tumor and normal mucosa for the high-affinity Kd values and for the number of high-affinity sites, suggesting a common regulation for both tumor and normal tissue. INTERPRETATION: These observations (i) could explain recently-reported clinically-active EGFR targeting in colorectal tumors apparently negative for EGFR, and (ii) may offer a plausible explanation for the link observed between toxicity in normal tissue (cutaneous rash) and clinical outcome of patients treated with anti-EGFR drugs. Present data extends our understanding of EGFR identity in colorectal cancer which could be useful in reconsidering the predictive tools for the identification of tumors putatively responsive to EGFR targeted therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although experience of laparoscopic treatment of rectal carcinoma has been reported, there is no evidence of its oncological safety because most procedures included partial mesorectal excision or abdominoperineal excision and quality of surgery is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the oncological results of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma. METHODS: From 2000 to 2003, 144 patients underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal adenocarcinoma. There were 88 men and 56 women, with a median age of 65 years. The tumor was located at 5.5 cm (range 1-12) from the anal verge and was classified uT1T2 in 25 cases and uT3 in 119 cases. One hundred twenty patients received preoperative radiotherapy. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 1% and 34% respectively. Conversion was 14% (n = 20). Macroscopic assessment of the specimen (n = 92) showed an intact mesorectum in 88% of the cases. The distal margin and the circumferential margin were safe in 98% and 94% of the cases, respectively. A complete microscopic excision, i.e., R0 resection, was achieved in 134 cases (93%). Pathological data were similar to those of an open match group. With a median follow-up of 18 months, there was no port-site recurrence and two patients had local recurrence (1.4%). The 3-year overall and disease- free survival rates were 89% and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A high quality of surgical excision can be achieved by the laparoscopic dissection, suggesting that this approach in treatment of rectal carcinoma is oncologically safe.

Adenocarcinoma↗