Biomedical subjects

JM Vossen

Publications and source records attributed to JM Vossen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

Prey catching in the archer fish: does the fish use a learned correction for refraction?

An answer to the question of how the archer fish hits an aerial insect, despite the refraction of light at the surface of the water has not yet been found. The aims of the present studies are to find out: (1) whether the fish applies a learned correction with the virtual image as a point of reference; (2) whether deprivation of practice in squirting affects performance. For the first aim the accuracy of squirts was measured in 30 subjects. Contrary to suggestions from the literature, elevation failures were prominent but the frequencies of over- and under-squirting did not differ, which does not support the idea that the fishes applied a learned correction for refraction by using feedback from the efficacy of squirts. For the second aim, five experimental subjects were deprived of practice, whereas six control subjects got daily practice, during 6 months. The only significant difference, found thereafter, was that during the first session experimental subjects aimed more often before squirting than control subjects did, but hitting was not affected. A number of subjects developed abnormal mandibles which inevitably led to squirting too high. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that the archer fish uses learned corrections for refraction.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2000

Interaction between positional but not between non-positional cues in human predictive learning.

Four experiments with human subjects examined the cue-interaction effects using a computer-controlled predictive learning task. In Phase 1, subjects learned that cue P was consistently associated with the occurrence of an outcome (P+), whereas cue N was never followed by the outcome (N-). In Phase 2, two neutral cues, R and I, were compounded with P and N, respectively. Each compound was followed by the outcome (PR+ and NI+). Thus, cue R was compounded with the already predictive cue P, whereas cue I was compounded with the non-predictive cue N. In each phase, subjects rated the contingency between the different cues and the outcome. In experiments 1 and 2, the spatial position of the cues was fixed, whereas it was variable in experiments 3, 4a and 4b. Verbal cues were used in experiments 1-3, whereas the cues consisted of geometrical figures in experiments 4a and 4b. Evidence for cue interaction, as indicated by giving cue I a higher contingency rating than cue R after or during Phase 2, was only found under the conditions of experiments 1 and 2. The results indicate that the use of positional cues facilitates the occurrence of cue-interaction effects. Possible reasons for this finding are discussed.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2000

Training history affects magnitude of spontaneous recovery from extinction of appetitive conditioned responding.

Three experiments examined spontaneous recovery from extinction of appetitive conditioned responding (CR) as a function of training history. Rats first received reinforced and non-reinforced conditioning trials. Groups of rats were equated for total number of reinforced trials but differed in the number of non-reinforced trials, or in the order of reinforced and non-reinforced trials. CR was then extinguished in all groups. Subsequently, the extent of recovery of CR was assessed in a test session performed either 1 or 17 days after the last extinction session. After a 17-day delay, rats that had received all reinforced trials immediately prior to the first extinction session showed stronger recovery than did rats having received all reinforced trials at the beginning of training, or interspersed among non-reinforced trials. No significant spontaneous recovery was observed after a 1-day test delay. These results, which may be of clinical relevance with respect to relapse after therapy, are explained in terms of the training schedules generating differences in strength of inhibitory associations, and a relatively long, but not a short, test delay attenuating these associations.

Journal Article↗