Biomedical subjects

Jack Barkin

Publications and source records attributed to Jack Barkin.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Use of a multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay to diagnose bladder cancer in patients with hematuria.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the multitarget UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for the diagnosis of bladder cancer in patients with hematuria and no history of bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, blinded trial was performed to compare the sensitivity of the fluorescence in situ hybridization assay to that of voided cytology in patients with gross or microscopic hematuria. Confirmation of hematuria was required. Voided urine was sent to a central laboratory for each study before cystoscopy. Suspicious lesions on cystoscopy were biopsied or resected. A centrally reviewed histopathological interpretation was used to confirm cancer and assign grade and stage. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients were enrolled at 23 centers and in 473 (95.2%) fluorescence in situ hybridization and cytology results were interpretable. Bladder cancer was diagnosed histologically in 50 patients (10.1%) and ureteral cancer was diagnosed in 1. Fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detected 69% of cases and cytology detected 38% (95% CI 25 to 52). When low grade, low stage (TaG1) tumors were excluded, fluorescence in situ hybridization detected 25 of 30 cancers (84%), while cytology detected only 15 (50%). Of 265 current or past smokers with hematuria and positive fluorescence in situ hybridization assay findings bladder cancer was detected in 65% with a history of greater than 40 pack-years compared to 13.6% to 24.2% in those with no, less than a 20 or a 20 to 40-pack-year smoking history. CONCLUSIONS: The UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization assay is significantly more sensitive than voided cytology for detecting bladder cancer in patients evaluated for gross or microscopic hematuria for all grades and stages. Based on these data UroVysion was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in patients with hematuria.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Erectile response to vardenafil in men with a history of nonresponse to sildenafil: a time-from-dosing descriptive analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil hydrochloride in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and a history of nonresponse to sildenafil citrate have previously been reported. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this descriptive analysis was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil at various times after dosing in men with ED and a history of nonresponse to sildenafil and who chose to attempt sexual intercourse between 0.25 and 6 hours after dosing with vardenafil. METHODS: This analysis used data from a previously published 12-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, placebo-controlled study conducted at 41 hospitals and outpatient clinics across Australia, Europe, Asia, and North America. In that study, men with ED and sildenafil nonresponse, defined using 6 rigorous criteria (including nonresponse to the highest recommended dose, 100 mg/d) were assigned to receive vardenafil 10 mg or placebo QD. At study weeks 4 and 8, patients in both groups were given the option to maintain the 10-mg/d dose, or have the dose titrated to 5 or 20 mg/d. The present analysis used data from patient diaries completed daily, which included information concerning attempts at sexual intercourse, time from dosing to attempt, penetration, and maintenance of erection sufficient for successful intercourse. At week 12, diary data were categorized into time intervals (in hours) after dosing. For each interval, the per-patient success rate was based on the total number of attempts made in that interval. Comparative statistics were not performed on the time-interval analysis. Tolerability was monitored throughout the study. Data concerning the primary end point were reported previously. RESULTS: A total of 463 men were enrolled, of whom 457 were included in the safety analysis (vardenafil, n = 231; placebo, n = 226) and 454 in the intent-to-treat analysis (vardenafil, n = 229; placebo, n = 225; mean age, 60.1 vs 59.0 years; mean body mass index, 28.7 vs 28.0 kg/m2). Six patients were excluded from the safety analysis (2 patients did not use study medication [placebo group], postbaseline safety data unavailable in 4 patients [2 in each study group]). Men receiving vardenafil had numerically greater penetration and completion success rates compared with those receiving placebo at all time intervals. Penetration success rates were numerically higher with vardenafil compared with placebo as early as within 0.25 hour after dosing (62% vs 30%); efficacy continued beyond 6 hours after dosing in 77% and 50% of patients, respectively. Similarly, vardenafil-treated patients had numerically greater completion success rates compared with those receiving placebo at 0.25 hour (53% vs 12%) and beyond 6 hours after dosing (70% vs 24%). The most common drug-related adverse events in the vardenafil and placebo groups were flushing (7% vs 1%), headache (6% vs 2%), and nasal congestion (5% vs <1%). CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive analysis suggests that erection sufficient for penetration and intercourse completion was achieved within 0.25 hour and lasted for >6 hours after dosing with vardenafil 10 mg in these men with mostly moderate to severe ED and a history of nonresponse to sildenafil and who chose to make attempts during those intervals. The drug was generally well tolerated.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of pentosan polysulfate sodium for interstitial cystitis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the current recommended dose of pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) with doses two to three times higher. METHODS: We evaluated three dosages (300, 600, and 900 mg) of PPS in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter, 32-week study. Adults (n = 380) with a diagnosis of interstitial cystitis (IC) as determined by a positive cystoscopic examination combined with bladder pain and urgency or a history of IC symptoms for at least 6 months were enrolled. Participants completed the Patient's Overall Rating of Symptom Index (PORIS) and the O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI) at baseline (ICSI only) and during follow-up visits at 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 32 weeks. RESULTS: Mean ICSI scores improved significantly during the 32 weeks for all dosages (baseline 11.2, 11.9, and 11.9 to endpoint 8.2, 8.1, 8.6 for 300, 600, and 900 mg, respectively; P <0.001) but the response to treatment was not dose dependent (no statistically significant difference in response among the three dosages). At baseline, 3.2%, 62.2%, and 34.6% reported mild, moderate, and severe symptoms, respectively, as assessed by the ICSI. At study end, 27.5%, 56.9%, and 15.7% reported mild, moderate, and severe symptoms, respectively. The PORIS scores improved within 4 weeks with 15.8% to 21.1% of all patients classified as responders (50% or greater improvement on PORIS). At 32 weeks, 49.6%, 49.6%, and 45.2% of all patients were responders at a dose of 300, 600, and 900 mg, respectively. Most adverse events were mild and resolved without intervention. CONCLUSIONS: For all three dosages of PPS, a clinically significant but similar response was demonstrated. The duration of therapy appears to be more important than the dosage.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with the dual 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: Dutasteride, a dual inhibitor of Type 1 and Type 2 5 alpha-reductase, has been shown to improve disease measures in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in three randomised, placebo-controlled, large-scale, 2-year Phase III clinical studies. This paper reports the pooled results of a 2-year open-label extension of the three randomised studies assessing the long-term efficacy and safety of dutasteride. METHODS: Patients randomised to dutasteride or placebo in the double-blind portion of the Phase III studies were eligible for a 2-year open-label extension, where all patients received dutasteride 0.5mg daily (dutasteride/dutasteride [D/D] group and placebo/dutasteride [P/D group]). RESULTS: Significant improvements in AUA-SI score and Q(max) were observed from Month 24 to 48 in both study groups. At Month 48, patients in the D/D group had significantly greater improvements in AUA-SI score and Q(max), and significantly greater reductions in prostate volume, than those in the P/D group. Acute urinary retention and BPH-related surgery occurred in a small percentage of patients during the open-label phase. No new safety issues were noted with long-term therapy. Onset of new drug-related adverse events were reported most frequently at the start of therapy and declined over time in patients receiving dutasteride. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with dutasteride results in continuing improvements in urinary symptoms and flow rate, and further reductions in TPV, in men with symptomatic BPH. The reduction in risk of AUR and BPH-related surgery, seen in the double-blind phase, was durable over 4-year treatment. Dutasteride was also well tolerated in long-term use.

5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors↗

PubMed2004

A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of controlled- and immediate-release oxybutynin chloride in urge urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new PO controlled-release (CR) QD oxybutynin tablet relative to PO immediate-release (IR) TID oxybutynin in patients with urge urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind trial, patients with UI (> or = 7 episode/wk) and frequency (> or = 8 micturitions/d) were randomized to CR or IR oxybutynin for 6 weeks. Patients initiated treatment at 15 mg/d and the dose was adjusted (in 5-mg/d increments) over 2 weeks according to tolerability. Efficacy (UI episodes, voids, absorbent pads used, urgency, and volume voided per micturition) was assessed during the final 2 weeks of treatment. Tolerability was assessed by evaluating adverse events and treatment withdrawals. RESULTS: Of the 125 patients randomized, 94 (75%) were evaluable for efficacy; tolerability was assessed in all patients. In the CR group, 48 patients (91%) were women and 5 (9%) were men; the mean (SD) age was 58.0 (12.4) years (range, 26-78 years). In the IR group, 37 patients (90%) were women and 4 (10%) were men; the mean (SD) age was 60.6 (14.8) years (range, 26-83 years). Both CR and IR oxybutynin significantly reduced the mean number of total UI episodes per week (both P < 0.001 vs baseline). Both treatments produced equivalent reductions in mean voiding frequency and urinary urgency (all P < 0.001 vs. baseline). Significantly more patients rated CR oxybutynin tolerable on the initial dose of 15 mg/d (P = 0.020) and completed the study at a dose of > or = 15 mg/d (P = 0.018). Dry mouth was the most common adverse event, reported by 68% and 72% of patients in the CR and IR oxybutynin groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients with urge UI included in this study, CR oxybutynin was as effective as IR oxybutynin for improving primary symptoms, with the additional benefit of QD administration.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Levofloxacin for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome in men: a randomized placebo-controlled multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a Canadian multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 6 weeks of levofloxacin therapy compared with placebo in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Uncontrolled studies have supported the use of antibiotics in CP/CPPS. METHODS: Men with a National Institutes of Health (NIH) diagnosis of CP/CPPS (specifically, no infection localized to the prostate) were randomized to levofloxacin (500 mg/day) or placebo for 6 weeks in 11 Canadian centers. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 weeks with the NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and global patient assessments (subjective global assessment and patient assessment questionnaire). RESULTS: Eighty men (average age 56.0 years, range 36 to 78; duration of symptoms 6.5 years, range 0.6 to 32) were randomized to receive levofloxacin (n = 45) or placebo (n = 35). All were evaluated in an intent-to-treat analysis. Both groups experienced progressive improvement in symptoms as measured by the NIH-CPSI. However, the difference in response was not statistically or clinically significant at end of treatment (6 weeks) or at the end of the follow-up visits (12 weeks). No patients withdrew because of adverse events. One patient withdrew before the 6-week assessment. Adverse events (all mild) were reported in 20% of the levofloxacin group and 17% of the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot placebo-controlled study showed that 6 weeks of levofloxacin therapy in men diagnosed with CP/CPPS resulted in symptom improvement that was not significantly different from that with placebo at end of treatment or follow-up. The clinical ramifications of these findings need to be addressed.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

The Canadian Enuresis Study and Evaluation--short- and long-term safety and efficacy of an oral desmopressin preparation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term (12 months) efficacy and safety of oral desmopressin (DDAVP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 256 healthy children (6-18 years old) with nocturnal enuresis with a frequency of > or = 10 wet nights during a 4-week observation period were eligible for inclusion in the study. Initially 0.2 mg of DDAVP was given for 14 nights. Those achieving a > 90% reduction in the number of wet nights over the observation period (full responders) began a 12-week continuous treatment period at this dose. The remaining children received 0.4 mg for an additional 14 nights. Those achieving a > or = 50% reduction in the number of wet nights (responders) commenced a 12-week continuous treatment period at this dose. Children with a < 50% reduction in the number of wet nights at this point were withdrawn from the study. Each 12-week treatment period was followed by a treatment-free period of 7-28 days. Children who remained dry during that period were assigned a full response and terminated the trial. Children with > or = 2 wet nights during that period immediately began a new 12-week treatment period at the previous dose. This was repeated for 12 months and thereafter the medication dose was tapered by halving over a 4-week period. RESULTS: A total of 117/236 children who completed the titration period (49.6%; 95% confidence interval 40-57%) responded (> 50% reduction over baseline). Throughout the study their response rate remained constant at approximately 74%. Continuous treatment reduced the median number of wet nights during the observation period from 5.75 to 1.00 per week. A total of 12.4% of children received the 0.2 mg dose and 87.6% the 0.4 mg dose. The proportion of full responses increased over the course of the study from 5.8% to 37.5%. DDAVP was well tolerated: the majority of reported adverse events were mild, although two adverse events leading to withdrawal were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Oral DDAVP provides an effective and well-tolerated means of providing long-term control in children with nocturnal enuresis. Long-term treatment increases the response rate.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2002

Effect of pentosan polysulfate therapy on intravesical potassium sensitivity.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate further the intravesical potassium sensitivity test (PST) as an indicator of the epithelial leak of interstitial cystitis (IC) and determine whether successful pentosan polysulfate (PPS; Elmiron) treatment is associated with a change in PST results. Most individuals with IC appear to have an abnormally permeable epithelium that allows urinary solutes such as potassium to penetrate to the bladder interstitium, provoking symptoms. METHODS: Data were from an optimal dose trial of PPS in IC. Patients underwent a PST before and after a 32-week trial of 300, 600, or 900 mg PPS/day. The response to PPS treatment was measured using the Patient Overall Rating of Improvement in Symptoms scale. The before and after treatment PSTs and Patient Overall Rating of Improvement of Symptoms scores were compared. RESULTS: Of 377 patients with IC at 28 centers, 302 (80%) had a positive PST at entry. Of the 198 patients who completed the study, 153 were PST positive at entry and 92 (60%) showed clinical improvement at exit. Clinically improved patients had significant improvement on the PST analog pain and urgency scales (3.2 to 1.3 and 3.6 to 1.9, respectively; P <0.0001). In contrast, patients with no clinical improvement had no significant change in pain (3.1 to 2.7) or urgency (3.6 to 3.2). CONCLUSIONS: PST shows abnormal epithelial permeability in most patients with IC and a significant reduction in this permeability after successful PPS therapy. PST appears to be a valid indicator of epithelial abnormality and a reliable test in the diagnosis of IC.

Administration, Intravesical↗

PubMed1997

Measuring the minimum clinically important difference in BPH outcome measures.

PURPOSE: To determine the minimum clinically important difference with respect to the different outcome measures used in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients diagnosed with symptomatic BPH were prospectively recruited from community urology clinics. Patients were asked at follow-up visits to rate their improvement using a self-administrated questionnaire. The improvement score was then compared to the changes from baseline in each of the outcome measures. RESULTS: Maximum and mean flow-rates did not correlate significantly with the patient's improvement measure. The Boyarsky score correlated best with the patient's grading of overall improvement (R=.507, p<.001). The mean change in Boyarsky symptom score for patients with a small improvement was 3.23 (sd=3.52).

Journal Article↗