PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jacqueline Fowler Byers

Publications and source records attributed to Jacqueline Fowler Byers.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

A review of organizational culture instruments for nurse executives.

Nurse executives are aware of the complexities of organizational culture. It impacts the nursing work environment and patient care safety and quality. The authors describe several widely available tools that nurse leaders can use to assess organizational culture in the work environment. The psychometric and conceptual strengths and weaknesses of the measures are described and recommendations for use in nursing and patient care administration are provided.

Data Collection↗

Meta-analysis and decision analysis bridge research and practice.

Research synthesis methods provide meaningful quantitative data through systematic review of the research literature and translation of these findings into practice implications. Meta-analysis has been the gold standard for translation of research findings into practice. Decision analysis has emerged as an alternative to and extension of meta-analysis. Examples, contrasting the application of meta-analysis and decision analysis, are presented and discussed in relation to its relevance in providing clinical direction. The methods are points along the continuum of translating research findings into practice. Meta-analytic studies provide an essential foundation for estimating and assigning the probabilities used in decision analysis, whereas the outcomes of decision analysis provide data for estimating the cost effectiveness of different interventions or treatment options. Decision analysis can assist in bridging the research-practice gap. Nurse researchers are urged to collaborate with other disciplines that have used these methods to refine translation and use of research findings in practice.

Decision Making↗

A comparison of nurses' needs/concerns and hospital disaster plans following Florida's Hurricane Floyd.

INTRODUCTION: The idea for this study was inspired by the response to Hurricane Floyd. Nurses are relied upon and expected to fulfill responsible roles during disaster situations, but little is known about the needs or concerns that nurses experience when they meet expectations and function as disaster responders. METHODS: Official copies of disaster protocols from 4 area hospitals were reviewed, and 4 focus groups consisting of ED nurses from respective hospitals provided information about nurses' concerns or needs in response to Hurricane Floyd. RESULTS: Of primary importance to nurses was family safety, pet care, and personal safety while at work. Secondary concerns were basic needs such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and rest. Group commitment levels to providing care during disaster situations varied greatly. Participants requested that hospital policy revisions address work assignments, pay/financial compensation, flexibility for extenuating circumstances, pet care, family sheltering, and provision of basic needs. DISCUSSION: It is not sufficient for a few key officials and planners to know their roles and responsibilities during a disaster; the roles of everyone involved must be clearly understood. Many participants described their conflict as family commitment versus professional obligation. We identified several areas of concerns in our interviews, and those areas have been clearly defined in the revised protocols. Other areas have yet to be addressed.

Adult↗

Gene therapy in the post-Gelsinger era.

As gene therapy research races to a first cure of a genetic-based disease, the research community has struggled with the aftermath of the well-publicized death of Jesse Gelsinger from complications of an experimental treatment. In a wrongful death lawsuit against the University of Pennsylvania and its researchers, Jesse Gelsinger's family alleged violations of federal regulations and research ethics. This article reviews gene therapy research, examines the role of the key players in this tragedy, and provides suggestions for preventing future misfortunes.

Adolescent↗

Components of developmental care and the evidence for their use in the NICU.

Developmental care, a philosophy of care that requires rethinking the relationships between infants, families, and healthcare providers, is in place in the majority of neonatal intensive care units in the United States. Developmental care includes a variety of activities designed to manage the environment and individualize the care of the premature infant based on behavioral observations. The goal is to promote a stable, well-organized infant who can conserve energy for growth and development. Research about the effects of developmental care has shown a trend toward improved short-term physiologic, development, and resource utilization outcomes for infants up to 24 months of age, but benefits beyond this age are unclear. Most of the research has focused on developmental care as a whole, but there is also strong scientific evidence for specific components of developmental care. The NICU care provider should use developmental care interventions that are clearly supported by evidence, and use others based on judgment and the infant's responses.

Child Development↗

Cueing into infant pain.

Unfortunately the history of pain management in infant care has included decades of inadequate analgesia for a wide range of medical procedures, including major surgery. This was justified in part on fear of drug and analgesic risks to the infant, as well as the commonly held belief that infants do not respond to, or remember, painful experiences. Today we understand that infant pain is encoded into observable manifestations through which an infant communicates behavioral and physiological changes such as altered vital signs, characteristic cries, and facial expressions. The purposes of this article are to (1) describe infants' physiological and behavioral responses to pain and its adverse effects, (2) review pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic infant pain management modalities and reliable pain assessment tools for use in clinical practice, and (3) educate healthcare professionals about the importance of assessment and management of infant pain.

Analgesia↗

Managed care and patient safety: risks and opportunities.

OBJECTIVE: Patient safety practices have primarily focused on providers, such as hospitals and ambulatory or long-term care. Based on the premise that most medical errors and patient safety problems arise from system issues, and that managed care constitutes the largest, most integrated system in health care, the authors examine the role of managed care in making patient care safer. STUDY DESIGN: Review of the literature and analysis of the role of managed care in patient safety. RESULTS: Authors find that although much has been written regarding managed care and quality, there is little research on managed care's relationship to patient safety. Research shows that managed care is not significantly different from indemnity insurance in terms of quality of care. However, managed care contracting, reimbursement, and management practices result in health care utilization changes that could pose potential risks for patient safety. Although managed care may pose possible risks to patient safety, practices can be monitored and adjusted to maintain quality and safety. At the same time, managed care provides opportunities for promoting patient safety at an integrated system level. Managed care organizations are in a unique position to influence patient safety by using safety strategies in selective contracting, financial incentives for performance, quality improvement programs, consumer education, and management and integration of care delivery. Our literature review reveals that health plans are starting to implement some of these strategies, but the practice is not widespread. CONCLUSIONS: Authors conclude with a framework and recommendations for patient safety.

Humans↗

The relationship between continuous quality improvement and research.

The adoption of new care processes can take years despite high-quality research findings that support the change in clinical practice. Healthcare quality professionals, with their leadership and continuous quality improvement (CQI) skills, are critical champions in accelerating and supporting the change toward evidence-based practice. Heightened attention to the relationship between CQI, research, and research utilization is vital. This article addresses CQI strategies and research activities that can help organizations advance quality of care and patient outcomes. By broadening their repertoire of CQI methods, healthcare quality professionals can provide more value to their organizations and expand the complex problems and projects that CQI teams can manage.

Education, Continuing↗

What quality improvement professionals need to know about IRBs.

Healthcare quality improvement (QI) studies are systematic analyses of processes and outcomes. As such, they meet one of the federal regulatory criteria defining research. They also meet the second criterion in many instances, generalizability of findings, even if it was not the study's original intent. Therefore, to err on the side of patients' rights, any studies involving human subjects or human data must be approved by federally mandated institutional review boards (IRBs) or their designees. This article explores federal regulations to protect research subjects, levels of IRB review, and strategies to simplify the IRB approval process and discusses implications for QI studies.

Confidentiality↗

Co-bedding versus single-bedding premature multiple-gestation infants in incubators.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the physiological stability and behavioral effects of co-bedding with those of single-bedding premature multiple-gestation infants in incubators as well as the psychological effects on their parents. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, repeated measure. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 16 infants and 8 parents in the co-bedded group, and 21 infants and 11 parents in the control group. INTERVENTIONS: Infants in the study group were co-bedded in incubators. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline and posttesting for parental state anxiety, maternal attachment, and parental satisfaction measures; infant sleep-wake synchronicity; physiological measures; and stress cue measures during baseline and activity. MAIN RESULTS: Repeated measures 5 (time) x 2 (group) analysis of variance found significant differences in infant daily weight, feeding amount, and high-activity heart rate. There was no difference in parental state anxiety, maternal attachment, and parental satisfaction scores by group, except for higher baseline parental satisfaction scores in the co-bedded group. CONCLUSIONS: This research demonstrated the safety of co-bedding multiple-gestation infants in incubators but did not find any significant clinical improvement in infant or parental outcomes with co-bedding. Neonatal intensive-care unit providers should educate staff and parents about the potential benefits of co-bedding and consider developing policies and procedures for co-bedding in both incubators and cribs. Co-bedding of multiple-gestation infants may be provided as an adjunctive developmental care strategy if parents desire this intervention.

Female↗