Biomedical subjects

Jacques Fermanian

Publications and source records attributed to Jacques Fermanian.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Assessment of the test-retest reliability and construct validity of a modified Lequesne index in knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the test-retest reliability and the construct validity of a modified version of the Lequesne index. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) fulfilling the revised criteria of the American College of Rheumatology completed the Lequesne index twice at a 3-h interval. Impairment outcome measures and patients' perceived discomfort in walking and handicap were recorded. An item-by-item analysis was performed. Items having insufficient psychometric properties were excluded. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct validity was investigated using Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included. One question assessing pain (question IE) had a weak reliability (Kappa (kappa) = 0.39) and was excluded. The test-retest reliability of the modified questionnaire was excellent (ICC = 0.95). Expected convergent and divergent correlations were achieved except for visual analog scale pain (VAS P) and VAS handicap (VAS H) (0.46 and 0.40, respectively), and the "a priori" double stratification was confirmed by factor analysis, explaining 48.7% of the variance. CONCLUSION: The modified form of the Lequesne index has sufficient psychometric properties to be used to assess pain and function in knee OA in a French population.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2003

[Are anxiety disorders more frequent in subjects with eating disorders?].

OBJECTIVE: We designed a controlled study comparing referred women with an eating disorder (ED) to a matched normal control group to answer the following questions: what are the frequencies of anxiety disorders (AD) in anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN), according to DSM-IV criteria? Are AD significantly more frequent among women with an ED than among women from the community? METHOD: We assessed frequencies of six specific AD among 271 women with a current diagnosis of AN or BN and 271 controls, using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), French DSM-IV version. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of both the AN and the BN subjects had a lifetime comorbidity with at least one AD, significantly more (p<0.001) than the percentage of controls with an AD. Prevalence was significantly higher in the ED groups than in controls for most types of AD, and between 41.8% and 53.3% of comorbid cases had an AD preceding the onset of the ED. CONCLUSION: Evidence that AD are significantly more frequent in subjects with ED than in the community has important etiological and therapeutic implications.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain.

OBJECTIVE: To translate and assess the reliability and the construct validity of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. DESIGN: Reliability and validity study. SETTING: Tertiary care teaching hospital and outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred one patients (mean age, 49 y). INTERVENTION: French translations were obtained by using the "translation-backward translation" method. Adaptations were made after a pilot study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Impairment outcome measures (visual analog scale [VAS] pain, neck range of motion, morning stiffness, score of neck sensitivity, radiologic score of Kellgren) and patients' perceived handicap (VAS) were recorded at the baseline visit. Three functional disability scales (Neck Disability Index [NDI], Neck Pain and Disability Scale [NPDS], Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire [NPQ]) were recorded twice, at baseline visit and 24 hours later. Reliability was assessed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct (convergent and divergent) validity was investigated by using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Test-retest was excellent for the NPDS and NDI (ICC =.91,.93, respectively) and good for the NPQ (ICC =.84). The Bland and Altman method showed no systematic trend. Expected convergent and divergent validity were observed only for the NPDS; 3 main factors were extracted by factor analysis and explained 78% of the cumulative variance. CONCLUSION: The 3 translated scales are valid, but the NPDS seems to have the best construct validity.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Impact of quality scales on levels of evidence inferred from a systematic review of exercise therapy and low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the scale used affects levels of evidence inferred from a systematic review of studies on exercise therapy and chronic low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Twenty trials previously analyzed in a systematic review were assessed by 2 readers using 16 different scales. SETTING: Tertiary care teaching hospital in France. PARTICIPANTS: Chronic LBP patients. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: For the scales allowing classification into high- and low-quality trials, a rating system with 4 levels of evidence was used to summarize conclusions drawn. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to assess correlations between the scores obtained with the different scales. Interrater reliability of the scales was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Bland and Altman method, and the degree of agreement between the readers was calculated using the kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Two of the 3 main results of the systematic review (conflicting evidence on the effectiveness of exercise therapy compared with inactive treatments; strong evidence that exercise therapy is more effective than usual care by a general practitioner) were influenced by the scale used. The range of the Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the different scales was wide (range,.49-.94), the interreader reliability of the scales was heterogeneous, and the interreader agreement was often low (kappa<or=.60 for 7/10 tests). CONCLUSIONS: The use of summary scores to identify physical therapy trials of high quality is questionable. Different quality assessment scales should probably be used to assess pharmacologic interventions and physical therapies. Development and validation of quality scales specific to physical treatments are needed.

Chronic Disease↗