PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jadwiga R Bienkowska

Publications and source records attributed to Jadwiga R Bienkowska.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Gotrees: predicting go associations from protein domain composition using decision trees.

The Gene Ontology (GO) offers a comprehensive and standardized way to describe a protein's biological role. Proteins are annotated with GO terms based on direct or indirect experimental evidence. Term assignments are also inferred from homology and literature mining. Regardless of the type of evidence used, GO assignments are manually curated or electronic. Unfortunately, manual curation cannot keep pace with the data, available from publications and various large experimental datasets. Automated literature-based annotation methods have been developed in order to speed up the annotation. However, they only apply to proteins that have been experimentally investigated or have close homologs with sufficient and consistent annotation. One of the homology-based electronic methods for GO annotation is provided by the InterPro database. The InterPro2GO/PFAM2GO associates individual protein domains with GO terms and thus can be used to annotate the less studied proteins. However, protein classification via a single functional domain demands stringency to avoid large number of false positives. This work broadens the basic approach. We model proteins via their entire functional domain content and train individual decision tree classifiers for each GO term using known protein assignments. We demonstrate that our approach is sensitive, specific and precise, as well as fairly robust to sparse data. We have found that our method is more sensitive when compared to the InterPro2GO performance and suffers only some precision decrease. In comparison to the InterPro2GO we have improved the sensitivity by 22%, 27% and 50% for Molecular Function, Biological Process and Cellular GO terms respectively.

Algorithms↗

A search method for homologs of small proteins. Ubiquitin-like proteins in prokaryotic cells?

The question of protein homology versus analogy arises when proteins share a common function or a common structural fold without any statistically significant amino acid sequence similarity. Even though two or more proteins do not have similar sequences but share a common fold and the same or closely related function, they are assumed to be homologs, descendant from a common ancestor. The problem of homolog identification is compounded in the case of proteins of 100 or less amino acids. This is due to a limited number of basic single domain folds and to a likelihood of identifying by chance sequence similarity. The latter arises from two conditions: first, any search of the currently very large protein database is likely to identify short regions of chance match; secondly, a direct sequence comparison among a small set of short proteins sharing a similar fold can detect many similar patterns of hydrophobicity even if proteins do not descend from a common ancestor. In an effort to identify distant homologs of the many ubiquitin proteins, we have developed a combined structure and sequence similarity approach that attempts to overcome the above limitations of homolog identification. This approach results in the identification of 90 probable ubiquitin-related proteins, including examples from the two prokaryotic domains of life, Archaea and Bacteria.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Using fold recognition to search for useful proteins: Bayesian approach to fold recognition.

The wealth of protein sequence and structure data is greater than ever, thanks to the ongoing Genomics and Structural Genomics projects. The information available through such efforts needs to be analysed by new methods that combine both databases. One important result of genomic sequence analysis is the inference of functional homology among proteins. Until recently sequence similarity comparison was the only method for homologue inference. The new fold recognition approach reviewed in this paper enhances sequence comparison methods by including structural information in the process of protein comparison. This additional information often allows for the detection of similarities that cannot be found by methods that only use sequence information.

Amino Acid Sequence↗