PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jaime Lozada

Publications and source records attributed to Jaime Lozada.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study.

PURPOSE: This 1-year prospective study evaluated the implant success rate, peri-implant tissue response, and esthetic outcome of immediately placed and provisionalized maxillary anterior single implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients (8 men, 27 women) with a mean age of 36.5 years (range 18 to 65) were included in this study. Thirty-five threaded, hydroxyapatite-coated implants were placed and provisionalized immediately after each failing tooth had been removed. The definitive restoration was placed 6 months later. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at implant placement and at 3, 6, and 12 months after implant placement. RESULTS: At 12 months, all implants remained osseointegrated. The mean marginal bone change from the time of implant placement to 12 months was -0.26 +/- 0.40 mm mesially and -0.22 +/- 0.28 mm distally. No significant differences in the Plaque Index scores were noted at different time intervals. The mean midfacial gingival level and mesial and distal papilla level changes from pretreatment to 12 months were -0.55 +/- 0.53 mm, -0.53 +/- 0.39 mm, and -0.39 +/- 0.40 mm, respectively. All patients were very satisfied with the esthetic outcome and none had noticed any changes at the gingival level. DISCUSSION: Although marginal bone and gingival level changes were statistically significant from pretreatment to 12 months of follow-up, they were well within clinical expectations. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that favorable implant success rates, peri-implant tissue responses, and esthetic outcomes can be achieved with immediately placed and provisionalized maxillary anterior single implants.

Adolescent↗

Repair of the perforated sinus membrane with a resorbable collagen membrane: a human study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of the repair of perforated sinus membranes with resorbable collagen membrane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A split-mouth design was followed. Twelve subjects requiring bilateral sinus grafting were included in the study; one site had been accidentally perforated during sinus augmentation and the other site had not been perforated. The perforated sites were repaired with a resorbable collagen membrane. Dental implants were placed during a second surgery, and biopsy samples were harvested from both sinuses during implant placement. New bone formation was measured for all sites. Implant survival was recorded at second-stage surgery. Panoramic radiographs were taken before and after sinus grafting and after implant placement. RESULTS: Nonperforated sites demonstrated significantly more bone formation (33.58% +/- 7.45%) than perforated sites (14.17% +/- 7.06%) (P < .0001). Perforated sites demonstrated significantly more soft tissue formation (63.58% +/- 12.96%) than nonperforated sites (48.5% +/- 12.57%) (P = .006). In nonperforated sites, residual graft particles had more of their surface in contact with bone (40.17% +/- 14.92%) than perforated sites (14.5% +/- 12.03%) (P < .0001). The implant survival rate at second-stage surgery was superior for nonperforated sites (100%) in comparison to perforated sites (69.56%) (P = .0028). DISCUSSION: This study suggested that repairing the perforated site of the sinus membrane with a resorbable collagen membrane may result in reduced bone formation and implant survival rate. A different technique and/or materials than those used in the current study may offer better results for the repair of the perforated sinus membrane. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that perforation and repair of the sinus membrane may compromise new bone formation and implant survival.

Absorbable Implants↗