PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

James B McClurken

Publications and source records attributed to James B McClurken.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Factors affecting survival after heart transplantation: comparison of pre- and post-1999 listing protocols.

BACKGROUND: Listing status for heart transplantation (Tx) patients was changed in 1999 from Status 1 and 2 to Status 1A, 1B and 2. Because the selection process was modified in favor of seriously ill patients, it was not clear whether this change would affect survival or other aspects of transplant management. METHODS: We examined outcomes in 551 patients transplanted at our institution between 1986 and 2002 (pre-1999: n = 419; post-1999: n = 132) to determine the effects of change in listing protocol on transplant outcome. RESULTS: Using Cox proportional hazard analysis, survival was not different between pre-1999 (pre) and post-1999 (post). Overall waiting-list times were longer post-1999 (pre: 134 +/- 10.5 days, post: 172 +/- 15.6 days; p = 0.044), and were longer post-1999 for blood groups A (177 vs 123 days), B (96 vs 84 days) and O (229 vs 172 days), but were shorter post for blood group AB (42 vs 68 days). Survival was not affected by age (pre: 53.7 +/- 0.52 years, post: 53.1 +/- 1.04 years; hazard ratio [HR] 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.996 to 1.023; p = 0.181), male gender (HR 1.132; 95% CI 0.822 to 1.56; p = 0.447) or waiting-list time. Serum creatinine was similar between the 2 groups (pre: 1.25 +/- 0.02, post: 1.26 +/- 0.04; p = 0.794), whereas pulmonary artery (PA) diastolic pressure was increased post-1999 (pre: 24.9 +/- 0.46, post: 27.0 +/- 0.74; p = 0.023). Survival was not affected by PA pressure (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.986 to 1.014; p = 0.976), but an elevated pre-transplant creatinine reduced survival (HR 1.484; 95% CI 1.139 to 1.933; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The change in listing status implemented in 1999 caused an increase in wait times for patients with blood types A, B and O, and shortened wait time for type AB; however, no differences occurred in overall post-transplant survival after the change in listing protocol. Age, gender and PA pressure had no effect on survival in either time period, whereas pre-transplant serum creatinine decreased survival in both patient groups.

Blood Group Antigens↗
PubMed2005

Recalcitrant chest wall Aspergillus fumigatus osteomyelitis after coronary artery bypass grafting: successful radical surgical and medical management.

This report describes a 62-year-old male diabetic patient with persistent chest wall osteomyelitis that developed after repeat coronary artery bypass grafting. The chronic infection was localized to the right anterior chest wall and refractory to medical and surgical treatment including long-term antiobiotics, five separate intraoperative debridements, and reconstruction with vascularized omentum over a two-year period at outside institutions. Aggressive surgical debridement with flap reconstruction resulted in definitive management. The organism isolated from multiple intraoperative bone, cartilage, and tissue cultures yielded Aspergillus fumigatus; therapy with itraconazole was utilized for 6 months. Surgical management of osteomyelitis and costochondritis is reviewed accompanied by a literature review on this uncommon cause of chronic chest wall infection.

Antifungal Agents↗
PubMed2005

Successful transplantation of an older donor heart with documented myocardial bridging: a case report.

Myocardial bridging, the overlying of myocardial tissue onto epicardial coronary arteries, is an anatomic variant that is widely present in the general population. This condition can be associated with reduced forward coronary flow. Once these hearts are identified in potential donors by either visual inspection or coronary catheterization, they may no longer be considered suitable for transplantation. We present a case study that successfully utilized such a heart explanted from an older donor with "bench" myotomy repair before implantation.

Contraindications↗
PubMed2004

Use of LeVeen pleuroperitoneal shunt for refractory high-volume chylothorax.

We present a case of intractable high-volume (> 2L/d) chylothorax after transhiatal esophagectomy treated successfully with the simultaneous insertion of both Denver (Denver Biomedical, Golden, CO) and LeVeen (Becton-Dickinson, Rutherford, NJ) pleuroperitoneal shunts. The patient initially had chemoradiotherapy for a T4N1 squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Re-staging showed a dramatic shrinkage of tumor, and a transhiatal esophagectomy was performed. Sequential bilateral thoracotomies were performed on postoperative days 19 and 26 for attempted control of high-volume chylothorax, but these were unsuccessful. Subsequent pleuroperitoneal shunt insertion was used, which immediately controlled the effusion. A shunt study was performed shortly after hospital discharge, which showed an occluded Denver shunt and a patent LeVeen shunt. The patient succumbed to metastatic carcinoma 18 months after discharge, but no pleural effusion had recurred.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2004

Effect of older donor age on risk for mortality after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasingly common use of donor hearts at least 50 years of age, controversy still remains regarding long-term outcome. Our goal was to determine if older donor age is associated with an increased risk of mortality and specifically if the use of donor hearts at least 50 years of age reduces survival. METHODS: We retrospectively studied records of all primary heart transplants performed between January 1990 and July 2002. Fifty-six patients who had received donor hearts at least 50 years of age were compared with 611 recipients of donor hearts less than 50 years of age. Clinicopathologic parameters were analyzed for their effect on mortality using the Cox proportional hazard model with calculation of hazard ratios (HR). Cut-point analysis of donor age was used to determine which donor age is associated with the greatest risk of mortality after transplant. RESULTS: Recipients of donor hearts at least 50 years of age were older (58.5 years +/- 7.0 vs 53.2 +/- 11.6; mean +/- standard deviation [SD]; p < 0.0001), suffered more often from ischemic cardiomyopathy (69% vs 50%, p = 0.01), and experienced a longer waiting time (192.2 days +/- 301.0 vs 138.6 +/- 190.8, p < 0.0001). Donor hearts at least 50 years of age (age 54.1 +/- 3.5 years) were more often female (50% vs 34%, p = 0.03), died less often of "head trauma" (9% vs 42%, p < 0.0001), and exhibited fewer cytomegalovirus (CMV) mismatches (29% vs 39%, p = 0.04) than donor hearts less than 50 years of age (age 26.8 +/- 12.3 years). Multivariate predictors of mortality were rejection index (HR 1.90 per unit [rejections/100 survival days], p < 0.0001), donor age (HR 1.16 per 10-year increment, p = 0.002), and recipient age (HR 1.24 per 10-year increment, p = 0.04). Recipients of donor hearts at least 50 years of age had reduced 1-year and 5-year survival ([65.7% vs 81.7%, p < 0.05] and [48.3% vs 68.4%, p < 0.05], respectively), as well as a higher proportion of deaths occurring within 1 month of transplant (41% of total deaths vs 23%, p = 0.06). Cut-point analysis indicated the characteristic of donor age of at least 40 years (categorical variable) to predict mortality with the same degree of fit as age used as a continuous variable. CONCLUSIONS: Although we observed a substantial reduction in survival among patients who were allocated donor hearts at least 50 years of age, this difference was not solely attributable to the categorical variable of donor age 50 in this group. Donor age as a continuous variable, however, was determined to be a notable predictor of survival and use of the donor age cut-point of 40 years (categorical variable) allowed risk stratification with similar accuracy. The use of a donor age cut-point of 40 years may be a useful clinical criterion for graft-related risk assessment.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Off-pump technique for Thoratec left ventricular assist device insertion.

We present a case of left ventricular assist device (Thoratec; Thoratec Laboratories Corp, Pleasanton, CA) insertion performed through a left thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient with severe end-stage congestive heart failure with renal and respiratory dysfunction and a history of multiple cardiac operations.

Assisted Circulation↗
PubMed2003

Cardiac transplantation across a positive prospective lymphocyte cross-match in sensitized recipients.

BACKGROUND: Although there is an increasing body of evidence for a deleterious effect of mismatched donor HLA antigens on the outcome of human cardiac transplantation, the role of anti-HLA lymphocytotoxic antibodies remains controversial. Thus, their appearance after cardiac transplantation has been associated with poor outcome by some groups; whereas others have reported them to be of no clinical significance. Furthermore, their presence prior to cardiac transplantation has also been the subject of similarly conflicting reports. The deleterious effect of such pre-existing antibodies has been predicted by a positive lymphocyte cross-match (LCM), which, for most patients awaiting renal transplantation and in many requiring a cardiac allograft, leads to cancellation of the operation. The reason for undertaking the current study was to test the hypothesis that the constraints which a positive LCM result impose in preventing renal transplantation may not apply to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four sensitized patients underwent OHT across a positive prospective LCM. Three were females, and one of those females also underwent cadaveric renal transplantation at the time of OHT. All four patients received aggressive early post-transplant immunosuppressive therapy, which included plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), antiproliferative agents (cyclophosphamide, basiliximab) and cytokine down-regulators (calcineurin inhibitors, muromonab-CD3) and anticell antibodies (OKT3, ATG). They also received standard immunosuppressive therapy which included corticosteroids. Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) was used for the identification of anti-HLA lymphocytotoxic antibodies. Reactivity of the latter against more than 10% of a panel of well-characterized T cells was considered sensitization, and required LCM to be performed prospectively, which test was also performed using the CDC technique. RESULTS: Three of the patients exhibited evidence suggestive of acute or hyperacute rejection in endomyocardial biopsy specimens by postoperative day (POD) 7. Two of the three patients with rejection also exhibited haemodynamic instability (elevated filling pressures and reduced cardiac index) on POD 1, which improved with inotropic support. One patient sustained a cardiac arrest on POD 7, and was successfully resuscitated without sequelae. All patients are now doing well, postoperatively (follow-up: 17-57 months) post-transplant. Two patients have normal left ventricular function and one patient has mild left ventricular dysfunction. Two have no further evidence of sensitization (PRA < 10%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of patients in this study is small, the long-term successful outcome of OHT following positive prospective cross-matches suggests that such a test result, in contrast to the restraints it imposes on renal transplantation, may not be a contra-indication to transplantation of the human heart. If OHT proceeds after the LCM is reported positive, aggressive immunotherapy should not only be initiated early, but should also be targeted at humoral-vascular rejection in particular.

Adult↗