Biomedical subjects

James Boyett

Publications and source records attributed to James Boyett.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Phase I clinical trial of mafosfamide in infants and children aged 3 years or younger with newly diagnosed embryonal tumors: a pediatric brain tumor consortium study (PBTC-001).

PURPOSE: A phase I trial of intrathecal (IT) mafosfamide was performed to determine the optimal dose, dose-limiting toxicities, and incidence and severity of other toxicities when administered in association with concomitant multiagent systemic chemotherapy to children younger than 3 years with newly diagnosed embryonal tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five assessable patients received IT mafosfamide at one of six dose levels ranging from 5 mg to 17 mg. Patients were premedicated with dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg) before receiving IT mafosfamide. Serial samples of CSF for pharmacokinetic studies were obtained in a subset of patients with Ommaya reservoirs. RESULTS: Irritability, presumably secondary to pain or headache during mafosfamide administration, was dose limiting in two of three patients at the 17-mg dose level. The maximum-tolerated dose of IT mafosfamide following premedication with dexamethasone and morphine was 14 mg. CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose of IT mafosfamide in patients younger than 3 years with newly diagnosed embryonal CNS tumors is 14 mg. A trial to assess the efficacy of regional therapy with IT mafosfamide administered with intensive systemic chemotherapy in children younger than 3 years with primary intracranial embryonal tumors is now in progress.

Affect↗

PubMed2003

Antagonism by methotrexate on mercaptopurine disposition in lymphoblasts during up-front treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is postulated to enhance mercaptopurine activation to thioguanine (INN, tioguanine) nucleotides, but the interaction has never been studied in vivo in cancer cells. METHODS: We investigated the effect of methotrexate on mercaptopurine disposition in plasma and leukemic blasts during up-front treatment of 233 children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Children were randomized to receive intravenous mercaptopurine (1 g/m(2) over a 6-hour period) or to receive methotrexate (low dose, 6 oral doses of 30 mg/m(2), or high dose, 1 g/m(2) intravenously), followed by intravenous mercaptopurine. All combinations have been previously used in frontline trials for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. RESULTS: Compared with mercaptopurine alone, methotrexate resulted in higher plasma mercaptopurine concentrations (30.3 +/- 14.7 micromol/L versus 23.5 +/- 18.0 micromol/L, P <.001) but, conversely, a 13-fold lower thioguanine nucleotide concentration (0.57 +/- 0.66 pmol/5 x 10(6) cells versus 7.4 +/- 15.2 pmol/5 x 10(6) cells, P <.001) in bone marrow leukemic lymphoblasts. Methotrexate was also associated with higher plasma hypoxanthine concentrations compared with those of patients given mercaptopurine alone (8.7 +/- 13.5 micromol/L versus 3.8 +/- 2.5 micromol/L, P =.029). The percentage change in leukocyte counts measured over a 3-day period showed that mercaptopurine alone had little effect (mean decrease, 20% +/- 33%). In contrast, despite causing lower intracellular thiopurine active metabolite concentrations, methotrexate produced a greater decrease in leukocyte counts (mean, 53% +/- 35%) compared with those in patients receiving mercaptopurine alone (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: These pharmacologic findings in the target tissue are consistent with the recently demonstrated lack of clinical benefit of intravenous mercaptopurine in combination with methotrexate. We conclude that, in the setting of newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia, methotrexate antagonizes thiopurine metabolite disposition in leukemic blasts after intravenous mercaptopurine.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed2003

Sequential conditional probability ratio tests for normalized test statistic on information time.

Sequential conditional probability ratio tests (SCPRTs) provide monitoring procedures with a unique property that a decision reached at early stopping is unlikely to be reversed should the trial continue to the planned end (Xiong, X., 1995, Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, 1463-1473; Tan, M., Xiong, X., and Kutner, M. H., 1998, Biometrics 54, 682-95). It actually provides a probability statement of a conclusion reversal, should the proposed interim analysis plan be used. To broaden its scope of applications, in this article we develop the SCPRT in terms of Brownian motion, which is applicable to most clinical trials with various endpoints. In addition, we utilize the unique structure of the SCPRT to derive a class of adaptive sequential tests that retain the significance level and power in the presence of a nuisance parameter. We illustrate the proposed methods with examples in clinical trials.

Biometry↗

PubMed2002

Persistence of lymphoblasts in bone marrow on day 15 and days 22 to 25 of remission induction predicts a dismal treatment outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We determined the prognostic importance of morphologically identifiable persistent disease at day 15 and days 22 to 25 of remission induction in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Among 546 patients entered on 2 consecutive protocols, 397 patients had evaluable bone marrow (BM) examinations on day 15 (+/- 1 day) and 218 on days 22 to 25 (+/- 1 day). Fifty-seven patients (14%) had persistent lymphoblasts (> or = 1%) in the BM on day 15 and 27 patients (5.5%) had persistent lymphoblasts on days 22 to 25. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was significantly worse for patients with lymphoblasts on day 15 (40% +/- 6%) or on days 22 to 25 (4% +/- 3%) as compared to those without lymphoblasts on these dates (78% +/- 2% and 76% +/- 2%, respectively, P <.001 for both comparisons). A worse prognosis was observed even for patients with a low percentage of lymphoblasts (ie, 1%-4%) at either day 15 (5-year EFS = 56% +/- 8%) or days 22 to 25 (5-year EFS = 0%) compared to those without morphologically identifiable persistent lymphoblasts at these times (P <.001 for both comparisons). The prognostic impact of persistent lymphoblasts on both dates remained significant after adjusting for other known risk factors, including treatment protocol, age, white blood cell count, DNA index, cell lineage, and central nervous system status, and National Cancer Institute/Rome criteria simultaneously. Hence, persistence of lymphoblasts (even 1%-4%) on day 15 of remission induction was associated with a poor prognosis and on days 22 to 25 signified a particularly dismal outcome; these very high-risk patients require novel or more intensive therapy to improve outcome.

Blast Crisis↗