PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

James Brophy

Publications and source records attributed to James Brophy.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is a persistent degree of uncertainty and dissatisfaction with the peer review process underlining the need to validate the current grant awarding procedures. This study compared the CLassic Structured Scientific In-depth two reviewer critique (CLASSIC) with an all panel members' independent ranking method (RANKING). Eleven reviewers, reviewed 32 applications for a pilot project competition at a major university medical center. RESULTS: The degree of agreement between the two methods was poor (kappa = 0.36). The top rated project in each stream would have failed the funding cutoff with a frequency of 9 and 35%, depending on which pair of reviewers had been selected. Four of the top 10 projects identified by RANKING had a greater than 50% of not being funded by the CLASSIC ranking. Ten reviewers provided optimal consistency for the RANKING method. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that there is a considerable amount of chance associated with funding decisions under the traditional method of assigning the grant to two main reviewers. We recommend using the all reviewer ranking procedure to arrive at decisions about grant applications as this removes the impact of extreme reviews.

Canada↗
PubMed2006

Ranking hospitals according to acute myocardial infarction mortality: should transfers be included?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this population-based observational cohort study was to estimate the extent to which the inclusion/exclusion of transferred patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) impacts on hospital performance rankings. SUBJECTS: The authors studied 91,633 adult patients admitted to 116 acute care hospitals in Quebec, Canada, with a primary diagnosis of AMI between 1992 and 1999. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Hospital performance ranks, based on 30-day AMI mortality rates, were estimated with hierarchical models and compared using 3 different methods for handling transferred patients (exclude all transfers; include transfers and assign outcome to the referring hospital; include transfers and assign outcome to the receiving hospital). The explanatory variable of interest was the hospital to which the patient's outcome was attributed. RESULTS: Using the 3 methods, 4 hospitals were ranked "best performers" once, and 1 hospital ranked among the best in 2 of the 3 analyses performed. Nine hospitals were ranked "worst performers" at least once (4 of which ranked among the "worst" once only, 2 ranked among the "worst" twice, and 3 were consistently ranked "worst performers" in all analyses). There was significant variation in mortality rates among hospitals, and the difference in the rates between the highest and lowest ranking hospitals exceeded the clinically relevant benchmark of 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Performance evaluation studies that compare hospital mortality rates typically exclude transferred patients. However, methods used to deal with AMI patient transfers influenced hospital ranks when comparing 30-day mortality rates. Excluding transfers may lead to an inaccurate depiction of the quality of healthcare services in regionalized healthcare systems that call for the timely interhospital transfer of patients with AMI.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

What is so odd about odds?

In clinical studies, the relative likelihood of an event occurring between 2 groups is often expressed as the risk ratio (RR) or the odds ratio (OR). The RR is an intuitive parameter that is relatively easy to interpret. Quantitative interpretation of an OR is much more difficult and is often incorrectly equated to that of an RR. The problem is that OR may differ substantially from RR, especially when the outcome of interest is common in the study population. This article explains and clarifies controversial issues surrounding the use and interpretation of the OR. Theoretical concepts relating to ORs are illustrated by examples from the surgical literature. By reviewing articles from 5 surgical journals over a 5-year period, we show that the OR is often presented and misinterpreted as equivalent to the RR. When the discrepancy is large, using OR uncritically as an estimate of RR will strongly bias inferences about treatment effect or cause of disease by amplifying the apparent strength of an association between an exposure and an outcome.

Odds Ratio↗
PubMed2003

Antibiotics in primary prevention of stroke in the elderly.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: An increasing number of reports have linked infections to atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Thus, use of antibiotics may lower the risk of developing cerebrovascular disease. We investigated whether antibiotic use is associated with the risk of stroke in elderly individuals treated for hypertension. METHODS: A cohort of 29 937 elderly subjects initiating antihypertensive therapy between 1982 and 1995 was formed from the Quebec healthcare insurance database. A nested case-control design was used in which each subject hospitalized with a primary discharge diagnosis of stroke between 1987 and 1995 was matched on calendar time to 5 randomly selected controls from the cohort. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios of stroke after adjustment for predisposing factors. RESULTS: We identified 1888 cases and 9440 controls. The overall adjusted odds ratio for current antibiotic use was 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.63 to 1.01), and that for recent use was 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.94). Penicillin was the only individual antibiotic class that showed a protective association across different time windows. No significant association was found between stroke risk and the use of fluoroquinolones, macrolides, tetracyclines, or cephalosporins. CONCLUSIONS: Although no clear, consistent associations between overall antibiotic use and cerebrovascular disease could be found, an intriguing association between penicillin use and stroke should be explored further.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Absence of association between infectious agents and endothelial function in healthy young men.

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have reported correlations between infections and coronary artery disease, associations with endothelial dysfunction, its precursor, have not been established. This study assessed whether infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae (CP), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), or Helicobacter pylori (HP) is associated with decreased endothelial function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five male subjects, aged 20 to 45 years, with no risk factors or known coronary artery disease were enrolled in a seroepidemiological cross-sectional study. Endothelial function was determined by flow-mediated brachial vasodilation. Serum antibodies consisting of anti-CP IgG and IgM, anti-CMV IgG, anti-EBV nuclear antigen, and anti-HP IgG and markers of inflammation including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were measured. Average age was 29.3+/-5.5 years. Seroprevalence values were 65.1%, 34.9%, 88.9%, and 14.3% for CP, CMV, EBV, and HP, respectively. Average values for endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation were 9.4+/-4.5% and 12.6+/-5.0%. Despite adequate statistical power (82% for the primary end point), no association between endothelial function and seropositivity to individual infectious agents, infectious burden, or C-reactive protein was observed in regression analyses controlling for variables including age, blood pressure, and lipid parameters. Moreover, no dose-response trends between serum titers and endothelial function were found. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of association between chronic infection with CP, CMV, EBV, HP, or pathogen burden and endothelial function was observed, suggesting that these agents are not implicated as early etiologic triggers in the genesis of coronary artery disease. These results do not preclude active involvement at later stages of the pathophysiological process, such as acceleration of existing atherosclerosis and acute plaque rupture.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Antibiotics in primary prevention of myocardial infarction among elderly patients with hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Given the premise that certain bacteria (such as Chlamydia pneumoniae) may play a role in the etiology of atherosclerosis, subjects treated with antibiotics that have antibacterial activity against C pneumoniae may be at lower risk for the development of an acute myocardial infarction (MI) than untreated subjects. METHODS: A case-control design, nested within a cohort of 29,937 elderly subjects in whom antihypertensive therapy was initiated (1982-1995) was used, in which each subject who was hospitalized with a primary discharge diagnosis of MI between 1987 and 1995 (n = 1047) was matched on calendar time to 5 randomly selected control subjects for exposure contrasts. Conditional logistic regression analyses were conducted to adjust for predisposing factors for MI. RESULTS: Although no clear consistent effect of antibiotics use was found in relation to MI, a trend was observed for a decreased risk of acute MI in patients receiving a prescription for antichlamydial antibiotics in the preceding 3 months (odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.46-1.00). Antibiotics without antichlamydial activity showed no benefit in MI risk. CONCLUSION: The beneficial effect of certain antichlamydial antibiotics in reducing the risk of MI cannot be excluded on the basis of this representative cohort of elderly patients in a routine clinical care setting. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm the usefulness of antibiotics in the primary prevention of MI.

Age Distribution↗