PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

James D Goldberg

Publications and source records attributed to James D Goldberg.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fetuses referred for sonographically suspected abnormalities of the corpus callosum.

OBJECTIVE: Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be useful in assessing the developing central nervous system. However, its utility in specific brain disorders has not been well investigated. We hypothesized that fetal MRI can better assess the integrity of the brain in cases with sonographically suspected callosal abnormalities. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed fetal MRI and prenatal sonographic studies of 10 fetuses referred for MRI for sonographically suspected callosal abnormalities. RESULTS: An abnormal corpus callosum was identified on fetal MRI in 80% of cases. The type of callosal abnormality (complete or partial agenesis) was similar on both prenatal sonography and fetal MRI in all cases. All sonographically identified additional brain abnormalities were detected on fetal MRI, with the exception of choroid plexus cysts. Furthermore, in 63% (5 of 8) of cases with a callosal abnormality on both sonography and fetal MRI, additional brain abnormalities were detected on fetal MRI that were not apparent on sonography. These sonographically occult findings were confirmed on postnatal MRI or autopsy in 3 of 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal MRI is an important adjunct to sonography in assessing the corpus callosum and other aspects of brain development when agenesis of the corpus callosum is suspected. It can identify frequent additional findings that are not visible on sonography such as abnormal sulcation. In light of the association between additional brain abnormalities and worse neurodevelopmental outcome, the potential of fetal MRI as an important adjunctive prognostic imaging test in fetuses with callosal agenesis can now be tested.

Agenesis of Corpus Callosum↗
PubMed2004

Routine screening for fetal anomalies: expectations.

Ultrasound has become a routine part of prenatal care. Despite this, the sensitivity and specificity of the procedure is unclear to many patients and healthcare providers. In a small study from Canada, 54.9% of women reported that they had received no information about ultrasound before their examination. In addition, 37.2% of women indicated that they were unaware of any fetal problems that ultrasound could not detect. Most centers that perform ultrasound do not have their own statistics regarding sensitivity and specificity; it is necessary to rely on large collaborative studies. Unfortunately, wide variations exist in these studies with detection rates for fetal anomalies between 13.3% and 82.4%. The Eurofetus study is the largest prospective study performed to date and because of the time and expense involved in this type of study, a similar study is not likely to be repeated. The overall fetal detection rate for anomalous fetuses was 64.1%. It is important to note that in this study, ultrasounds were performed in tertiary centers with significant experience in detecting fetal malformations. The RADIUS study also demonstrated a significantly improved detection rate of anomalies before 24 weeks in tertiary versus community centers (35% versus 13%). Two concepts seem to emerge from reviewing these data. First, patients must be made aware of the limitations of ultrasound in detecting fetal anomalies. This information is critical to allow them to make informed decisions whether to undergo ultrasound examination and to prepare them for potential outcomes.Second, to achieve the detection rates reported in the Eurofetus study, ultrasound examination must be performed in centers that have extensive experience in the detection of fetal anomalies.

Congenital Abnormalities↗
PubMed2003

Prenatal diagnosis.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Abdominal Muscles↗