PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

James D Heckman

Publications and source records attributed to James D Heckman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Editor's note.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2004

The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part I. Defining the review.

The peer review process is integral to the functioning of all scientific journals and plays a pivotal role in the publication of new scientific material. Timeliness, freedom from bias, and proper review etiquette are essential for an effective review. Each type of scientific article demands a slightly different reviewing technique. Clinical research articles require that a proper question be asked and that the study methodology allows the question to be answered effectively. All studies dealing with human subjects need to be approved by the Institutional Review Board. Clinical review articles have specific criteria to determine how they should be constructed and when they should be published, whereas basic science research articles should be evaluated for their experimental method as well as the relevance of the conclusions to the data. Finally, case reports have an important place in the scientific literature, but the rationale for publishing any individual case needs to be clearly established.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2004

The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part II. Optimizing the manuscript: practical hints for improving the quality of reviews.

Manuscripts submitted to musculoskeletal journals have several key components that need to be critically evaluated. There are specific methods to assess the abstract, illustrations, references, and other major elements of a manuscript under review. If each of these elements is assessed methodically, not only does the quality of the review improve, but it becomes more useful for the journal editor. Additionally, the method in which the review is conveyed has a marked impact on its usefulness. There should be a concise evaluation of the entire work, stating whether a publication should or should not be pursued. For poor manuscripts, several bulleted points that indicate the fatal flaw(s) are sufficient, but for good manuscripts, a systematic itemization of weaknesses will improve the quality of the manuscript. Reviews should not be derogatory and should be prompt and to the point.

Humans↗
PubMed2003

Curricular reform in musculoskeletal medicine: needs, opportunities, and solutions.

Musculoskeletal medicine is not taught adequately in American medical schools and the predictable consequences are seen. Students cannot show cognitive mastery of the subject and lack confidence in this topic. To address this, the Academic Orthopaedic Society held a symposium on medical school education at its annual meeting in 2001. There, the panelists presented an analysis of the problem and proposed solutions. Specifically, it was noted that because of the autonomy of the various schools and their varied approaches to teaching, it would be unlikely that one monolithic and mandated plan could be effective on a national basis. Rather, successful reform would comprise a coalition-based effort to define learning objectives, to provide teaching materials, and to create forums for sharing resources. Recruitment of national organizations was thought to be essential. Finally, it was felt that although inadequate education is neither new nor necessarily unique among disciplines, the coming year or two, the beginning of the Bone and Joint decade, was seen to be a particularly auspicious time for attempting curricular reform.

Curriculum↗