PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

James Daubert

Publications and source records attributed to James Daubert.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Variation in left atrial transmural wall thickness at sites commonly targeted for ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The number of catheter ablations performed for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased dramatically over the past several years. Regional variation in left atrial (LA) wall thickness is known to exist but have not been described in detail. AF ablation success and complication rates may be related to regional differences in LA wall thickness. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in transmural wall thickness in five pre-defined anatomic areas within the LA which are commonly targeted for AF ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured LA wall transmural thickness in 34 human heart specimens using calipers in five anatomic areas frequently targeted during AF ablation (anterior wall, septum, mitral isthmus, posterior wall and roof). RESULTS: The autopsied individuals were 53% female, 67.7% had CAD, 14.7% had atrial fibrillation, 61.8% had hypertension, and 21.6% had congestive heart failure. The roof was the thinnest region with mean thickness measuring significantly less than each other area (p 0.005 for the posterior wall and <0.001 for all other areas). The septum was the thickest region with mean thickness measuring significantly greater than each other area (p = 0.05, 0.001, <0.001, <0.001 measured against the anterior wall, isthmus, posterior wall and roof, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Significant regional differences exist for mean left atrial wall thickness among the different anatomic areas within the left atrium which are often targeted during catheter ablation of AF. These differences may have significant implications in determining the ideal intensity and total duration of radiofrequency energy required to achieve a safe and successful ablation.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The clinical implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing in the multicenter automatic defibrillator trial II.

INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to assess whether right ventricular pacing in the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) arm of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II was associated with an unfavorable outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on the number of ventricular paced beats were available in 567 (76%) of 742 MADIT II patients with ICDs. The number of ventricular paced beats over the total number of beats showed a bimodal distribution with patients being predominantly paced or nonpaced. Therefore, patients were dichotomized at 0-50% and 51-100% of cumulative pacing with median pacing rate 0.2% and 95.6%, respectively. Endpoints included new or worsening heart failure, appropriate ICD therapy for VT/VF, and the combined endpoint of heart failure or death. Clinical features associated with frequent ventricular pacing included age >or=65 years, advanced NYHA heart failure class, LVEF < 0.25, first degree AV and bundle branch block, and amiodarone use. During follow-up, 119 patients (21%) had new or worsened heart failure, 130 (23%) had new or worsened heart failure or death, and 142 (25%) had appropriate therapy for VT/VF. In comparison to patients with infrequent pacing, those with frequent pacing had significantly higher risk of new or worsened heart failure (hazard ratio = 1.93; P = 0.002) and VT/VF requiring ICD therapy (HR = 1.50; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in MADIT II who were predominantly paced had a higher rate of new or worsened heart failure and were more likely to receive therapy for VT/VF. These results suggest the deleterious consequences of RV pacing, particularly in the setting of severe LV dysfunction.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Analysis of cause-specific mortality in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study.

BACKGROUND: Expectations that reestablishing and maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation might improve survival were disproved in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. This report describes the cause-specific modes of death in the AFFIRM treatment groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: All deaths in patients enrolled in AFFIRM underwent blinded review by the AFFIRM Events Committee, and a mode of death was assigned. In AFFIRM, 2033 patients were randomized to a rhythm-control strategy and 2027 patients to a rate-control strategy. During a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, there were 356 deaths in the rhythm-control patients and 310 deaths in the rate-control patients (P=0.07). In the rhythm-control group, 129 patients (9%) died of a cardiac cause, and in the rate-control group, 130 patients (10%) died (P=0.95). Both groups had similar rates of arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic cardiac deaths. The numbers of vascular deaths were similar in the 2 groups: 35 (3%) in the rhythm-control group and 37 (3%) in the rate-control group (P=0.82). There were no differences in the rates of ischemic stroke and central nervous system hemorrhage. In the rhythm-control group, there were 169 noncardiovascular deaths (47.5% of the total number of deaths), whereas in the rate-control arm, there were 113 noncardiovascular deaths (36.5% of the total number of deaths) (P=0.0008). Differences in noncardiovascular death rates were due to pulmonary and cancer-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Management of atrial fibrillation with a rhythm-control strategy conferred no advantage over a rate-control strategy in cardiac or vascular mortality and may be associated with an increased noncardiovascular death rate.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

MADIT-II: clinical implications.

The MADIT-II trial showed that in patients with a prior myocardial infarction and ejection fraction </=0.30, prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator improves survival with a 31% reduction in mortality during an average follow-up of 20 months. Electrophysiologic inducibility was positive in 36% of patients at the time of ICD implantation. Inducibility was associated with increased ICD utilization for ventricular tachycardia during long-term follow-up, and decreased utilization for ventricular fibrillation. These preliminary findings raise questions about the clinical usefulness of electrophysiologic testing as a risk stratifier in patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction.

Adult↗