PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

James F Gardner

Publications and source records attributed to James F Gardner.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Antidepressant prevalence for youths: a multi-national comparison.

OBJECTIVE: To compare antidepressant prevalence data in youths across three western European countries (Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands) with US regional data in terms of age and gender and to show proportional subclass antidepressant (ATD) use. METHOD: A population-based analysis of administrative claims data for the year 2000 was undertaken in 0 to 19-year-old enrollees who were part of the insured populations from four countries having a total of from 72,570 to 480,680 members. RESULTS: ATD medication utilization in the US dataset (1.63%) exceeded that of three Western European countries (prevalence ranged from 0.11 to 0.54%) by at least 3-fold. There were major variations in the use of subclasses: tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) predominated in Germany while selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) predominated in the US, Denmark and the Netherlands. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-national variations should be further explored to understand the factors related to these differences and how prevalence differences relate to effectiveness and safety. Community-based cohorts should be followed to establish outcomes in the usual practice setting.

Adolescent↗

Anticonvulsant treatment for psychiatric and seizure indications among youths.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the prevalence of anticonvulsant treatment for youths with a diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder to youths with a diagnosis of a seizure disorder. METHODS: Administrative claims from outpatient visits and prescriptions were organized for a data set of 258,472 youths who were younger than 18 years of age in a mid-Atlantic state Medicaid program and were continuously enrolled in 2000. Youths dispensed an anticonvulsant were grouped into the following ICD-9 diagnostic categories: a diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder without a seizure disorder, a diagnosis of a seizure disorder without a psychiatric disorder, and a diagnosis of both a psychiatric and a seizure disorder. Anticonvulsant use was analyzed for specific diagnostic classes by age, gender, race or ethnicity, and Medicaid eligibility categories. RESULTS: A total of 4,522 youths in the one-year data set received an anticonvulsant (1.75 percent): 3,061 had a psychiatric disorder only, 251 had a seizure disorder only, and 611 had both psychiatric and seizure disorders. Among anticonvulsant-treated youths with diagnosis information in their records (3,923 of 4,522 youths), 81 percent had a psychiatric diagnosis and 19 percent had a seizure disorder; 71 percent of those with a seizure disorder also had a psychiatric disorder. Anticonvulsant use for seizure control was proportionally greater for those younger than five years. By contrast, a vast majority of anticonvulsant users with a psychiatric diagnosis were between five and 17 years. Among anticonvulsant-treated youths with a psychiatric diagnosis, males were approximately twice as common as females. For youths with a seizure disorder, no difference was found for gender. Mood disorders and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder were the major psychiatric diagnoses associated with anticonvulsant use. Valproic acid products were the most commonly dispensed type of anticonvulsant. CONCLUSIONS: Recent state Medicaid data reveal that youths who use anticonvulsants are far more likely to have a psychiatric diagnosis than a seizure diagnosis. Widespread off-label use of anticonvulsants for psychiatric disorders among youths warrants attention to ensure benefits and minimize risks.

Adolescent↗

Multiple psychotropic medication use for youths: a two-state comparison.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare multiple psychotropic use among youths enrolled in two U.S. mid-Atlantic state Medicaid and state Children's Health Insurance Programs (SCHIP). METHODS: Administrative data were used to examine multiple psychotropic use among youths less than 20 years of age and who were continuously enrolled in Medicaid or SCHIP programs in two states during 1999. Multiple psychotropic use referred to multiclass combinations and was defined by the number of months of multiple use. Main outcome measures were the prevalence of multiple psychotropic use and months of multiple use. Demographic and clinical characteristics, mental health visits, and common combinations were examined according to months of multiple use. RESULTS: Among continuously enrolled youths, 21%-22% had at least one mental health-related visit, 8%-10% received a psychotropic medication, and 2%-3% received multiple psychotropic medications. Nearly one third (28%-30%) of youths with any psychotropic use received multiple medications, of which almost half was for 5-12 months. Multiclass use was more common in male, white, aged 10-14, disabled, and foster-care youths. Stimulants with antidepressants, antipsychotics, or alpha-agonists were the most common combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple use occurred in nearly one third of youths with any psychotropic treatment. Additional research is needed to investigate switching patterns and the effectiveness of combined pharmacotherapy.

Adolescent↗

Effect of Medicaid eligibility category on racial disparities in the use of psychotropic medications among youths.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine the degree to which Medicaid eligibility categories modify disparities between black and white youths in the prevalence of psychotropic medication. METHODS: Computerized claims for 189,486 youths aged two to 19 years who were continuously enrolled in a mid-Atlantic state Medicaid program for the year 2000 were analyzed to determine population-based annual prevalence of psychotropic medication by race or ethnicity and by whether the youths were eligible for Medicaid for reasons of family income, disability, or foster care placement. Logistic regression was used to assess the interaction of eligibility category and race. RESULTS: The mean annual prevalence of psychotropic medication for the population was 9.9 percent. The prevalence was 2.17 times higher for white youths than for black youths (16.5 percent compared with 7.6 percent). However, within eligibility categories, the white-to-black disparity was 3.8 among youths who were eligible for Medicaid because their family income was below the federal poverty level and 3.2 for youths enrolled in the State Children's Health Insurance Program. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid eligibility categories had a profound impact on the racial disparity associated with the prevalence of psychotropic medications for youths. Eligibility category should be taken into account when ascertaining the role of access, undertreatment, and culture in disparities in mental health treatment.

Adolescent↗

Attainment of personal outcomes by people with developmental disabilities.

In 1993, The Council on Quality and Leadership in Supports for People With Disabilities (The Council) developed a person-centered outcome assessment instrument, Personal Outcome Measures (1997). The Council has maintained a database (N = 3,630) of Personal Outcome Measures interviews conducted during accreditation reviews. Our purpose in this article is to report findings on (a) the relationships between and among the Personal Outcome Measures (The Council, 1997) and patterns of individual outcome attainment and (b) to examine the impact of characteristic variables (disability, organizational size, residential type, or source of program funding) on the individual attainment of personal outcomes. Alternatives are suggested for examining the dimensions of both quality of service and quality of life for people with disabilities.

Achievement↗

Comparative prevalence of psychotropic medications among youths enrolled in the SCHIP and privately insured youths.

The one-year prevalence of use of psychotropic medications among youths enrolled in a Mid-Atlantic State Children's Insurance Program (SCHIP) in 1999 or 2000 was compared with the 1998-2000 prevalence findings for youths enrolled in four large multistate private medical insurance programs. Prevalence was significantly higher among youths enrolled in the SCHIP than among those with private insurance in all eight medication group comparisons. Unlike private insurance, the surveyed state SCHIP program did not require a copayment or have a restrictive formulary. These administrative differences may partly explain the comparatively higher rate of psychotropic use under the SCHIP.

Adolescent↗

Psychotropic practice patterns for youth: a 10-year perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in the full spectrum of psychotropic medication treatment for youths from 1987 to 1996. METHODS: A population-based analysis of community treatment data on nearly 900,000 youths enrolled in 2 US health care systems included (1) computerized Medicaid data from 2 states (a midwestern state and a mid-Atlantic state) composed of outpatient prescription claims and enrollment records and (2) computerized prescription dispensing records from a group-model health maintenance organization. Ten 1-year cross-sectional data sets from 1987 through 1996 were analyzed. RESULTS: Total psychotropic medication prevalence for youths increased 2- to 3-fold and included most classes of medication. The rapid growth since 1991 of alpha-agonists, neuroleptics, and "mood stabilizer" anticonvulsants was particularly notable. The 1996 prevalence of any psychotropic medication among youths younger than 20 years was remarkably similar (5.9%-6.3%) across all 3 sites, with stimulants and antidepressants consistently ranked first and second. Medicaid rates almost always exceeded health maintenance organization rates by large margins, particularly for alpha-agonists, neuroleptics, "mood stabilizer" anticonvulsants, and lithium. Youths in health maintenance organizations had rates similar to Medicaid-insured youths for antidepressants and hypnotics. Over the decade, there was a proportional increase in females receiving stimulants and in males receiving antidepressants, particularly for the 10- to 14-year-old group. The prevalence ratios of whites to African Americans narrowed substantially in 1 Medicaid site. CONCLUSIONS: Youth psychotropic treatment utilization during the 1990s nearly reached adult utilization rates. Youth findings can be used to accurately assess the duration of treatment and unforeseen practice pattern changes, and to identify safety concerns.

Adolescent↗

Resource utilization for patients undergoing hysterectomy with or without lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to study the association of age, comorbid illness, race, and type of hospital with resource use in patients undergoing hysterectomy and lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer. METHODS: The study was a population-based analysis of patients undergoing hysterectomy with a diagnosis of endometrial cancer in Maryland 1994-1996. Chi-square and t tests determined differences in means or proportions. Multivariate logistic regression methods were used to build predictive models. RESULTS: The 1281 women underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, 91%; total vaginal hysterectomy, 6%; radical hysterectomy, 2.5%, laparoscopically assisted total vaginal hysterectomy, 0.3%; 32% also underwent lymph node dissection. Neither age, nor race, nor comorbid illness influenced admission to teaching hospitals. Co-morbidity was documented in 56% of cases. African Americans were more likely to have one (P = 0.002) or >1 co-morbid illness (P = 0.045) than Caucasians. The most common complications were anemia (13.6%), infection/fever (12%), cardiac (9.4%), pneumonia (8%), ileus (5%), and bowel obstruction (5%). These complications occurred with higher frequency in teaching hospitals (P = 0.0001), In large hospitals (P = 0.0001), and in African American patients compared to Caucasians (P = 0.028). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that older age, admission to teaching or large hospitals, lymph node dissection, heart disease, and African American race were associated with significantly higher resource use. CONCLUSION: We documented age and racial/ethnic differences in comorbid illness, complications, and resource utilization for patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. The differences in resource use for teaching hospitals may be reflective of the severity of complications, which are indirectly determined by length of stay. Given the higher costs and skills required to care for elderly women with comorbid disease and complications, quantification of the complexity of care is of utmost importance for allocation of sufficient resources for the care of women with endometrial cancer.

Adult↗

Rising prevalence of antidepressants among US youths.

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in antidepressant (ATD) prevalence and the sociodemographic and clinical correlates of ATD use among youths who are treated in community practice settings. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken using large data sets from 3 US sites. Outpatient prescription and clinical service records of youths who were aged 2 to 19 and enrolled in Midwestern Medicaid (MWM) and mid-Atlantic Medicaid (MAM) state programs and a group-model health maintenance organization (HMO) were organized into seven 1-year cross-sectional data sets from 1988 through 1994 to evaluate ATD utilization patterns. RESULTS: In 1994, ATD prevalence per 1000 youths was 19.10 (MWM), 17.78 (MAM), and 12.85 (HMO), which represented a consistent increase in prevalence from 1988-1994: 2.9-fold (MWM), 4.6-fold (MAM), and 3.6-fold (HMO). Despite the rapidly expanding use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors prescribed mainly for depression, more than half of ATD use in 1994 was still attributable to tricyclic antidepressants prescribed mainly for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. ATD prevalence was generally predominant among 10- to 14-year-old boys and among 15- to 19-year-old girls. In the Medicaid populations, 42% (MAM) and 72% (MWM) of ATD-treated youths had primary care services, whereas the bulk of the remainder had psychiatric services. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder followed by depression led the physician-reported primary care diagnoses associated with ATD use, whereas that diagnostic rank order was reversed for youths who received psychiatric services. CONCLUSIONS: ATD treatments among youths substantially increased in the 1990s. This was generated primarily by primary care providers, and thus evaluations of the outcome of ATD treatment need to target primary care in addition to psychiatric providers. Longitudinal study designs are needed to evaluate the use of ATDs in youths in regard to the duration of treatment, combination medications, and the reasons for treatment.

Adjustment Disorders↗

Effect of center- versus patient-specific factors on variations in dialysis adequacy.

Efforts to improve the delivery of hemodialysis have focused mostly on identifying patient-related factors that lead to inadequate dialysis. Less consideration has been given to the impact of the dialysis center on adequacy. This study evaluated whether the dialysis facility or individual-level factors were the primary influence on variations in dialysis adequacy. This was a retrospective analysis of 4971 hemodialysis patients in 189 centers with urea reduction ratio (URR) values obtained in the final quarter of 1997. The between-center variation and the within-center correlation in URR values were quantified to determine the contribution of a center effect on variations in adequacy; furthermore, the proportion of variance attributable to the centers' effect and individual-level dialysis covariates were compared. There was a wider between-center variation in mean URR values (SD, 4.8%) than expected if there were no center effect (SD, 2.5%). There was a strong within-center correlation in URR values, measured by the parameter rho, which was only minimally diminished after adjusting for individual-level covariates (adjusted rho, 0.14; P < 0.0001). The variation in URR attributable to the center effect, quantified by R(2), was greater than that related to individual-level dialysis factors (facility- and individual-level dialysis covariates R(2), 23.6 and 11.3%, respectively). Initiatives to improve the delivery of dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease should be directed at facility policies governing dialysis care, along with patient-specific problems, because center effects have a major influence on dialysis adequacy.

Female↗