Biomedical subjects

James F Simon

Publications and source records attributed to James F Simon.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Evaluation of two different teaching concepts in dentistry using computer technology.

The common teaching goal of two different phantom head courses was to enable the students to provide an all-ceramic restoration by the means of computer technology. The aim of this study was to compare these two courses with regard to the different educational methods using identical computer software. Undergraduate dental students from a single year were randomly assigned to two different courses. One course was a conventional teacher-centred course [TRAD]. The other course contained problem-based learning (PBL) oriented structured modules [HYBRID]. The students completed an evaluation based on a 25 item seven-point Likert scale. Two independent evaluators assessed the practical work. Differences between TRAD and HYBRID were tested for significance using the Mann-Whitney U-test (at p < or = 0.05). Both courses were rated as demanding. The HYBRID group rated those items significantly better, which focused on course atmosphere and student-teacher relationship. The TRAD group felt that their course was more satisfying. Practical results of the two groups did not differ significantly. Within the limits of the study it was revealed, that the HYBRID group was less satisfied with the own success although the learning conditions were rated better. This could be interpreted in two ways: (1) the PBL oriented course lead the students to more self skepticism to their own work or (2) due to increased intellectual demands and the lack of detailed guidelines the course was felt as more burdening.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2005

Dentist-time expenditure for two different adhesive all-ceramic systems.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this clinical investigation was to compare a chair-side adhesive all-ceramic system to a laboratory processed adhesive all-ceramic system with respect to quality and time expenditure for the dentist. METHODS: The same dentist treated 10 patients, who were each to receive two large posterior single tooth restorations of similar location and extent. One restoration was made in the laboratory by using the IPS Empress system [LAB], the other one was done chair-side by utilizing the Cerec system [CHAIR]. The time expenditure was measured for [LAB] and [CHAIR] and compared by the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The restorations were also evaluated according to the USPHS criteria. RESULTS: The mean time expenditure for the dentist with low-level assistance was 111:03 min [S.D.+/-24:09 min] for [LAB] and 115:31 min [S.D.+/-15:54 min] for [CHAIR]. Time expenditure with medium level assistance for the operator was 100:53 min [S.D.+/-23:59] for [LAB] and 105:50 [S.D.+/-15:28] for [CHAIR]. Assuming a high level of assistance, the mean time values were 53:11 min [S.D.+/-14:29] for [LAB] and 54:29 min [S.D.+/-09:21] for [CHAIR]. The baseline investigation according to the modified USPHS criteria did not reveal any differences between [CHAIR] and [LAB]. CONCLUSION: There were no statistical significant differences with respect to time expenditure or quality between [LAB] and [CHAIR] in this study.

Aluminum Silicates↗

PubMed2004

Induction sirolimus and delayed graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Previous studies have reported a link between the use of induction sirolimus (INDSRL) and delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation. However, none have had sufficient power to adjust for all factors known to be associated with DGF. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US deceased donor kidney transplantation recipients in the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) from January 1, 2000 to May 31, 2001. Logistic regression analysis was used to model adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for the development of DGF, adjusted for other factors previously reported to be associated with DGF. RESULTS: Among 8,319 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 361 patients received INDSRL, of whom 98 (27.1%) had DGF, compared to 22.5% among patients who did not receive INDSRL. In multivariate analysis, INDSRL was associated with an increased risk of DGF, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.42 (95% CI: 1.07-1.90). Other factors associated with DGF were similar to those previously reported. INDSRL was not significantly associated with graft loss at 1 year in Cox regression. CONCLUSIONS: INDSRL was independently associated with DGF in US deceased donor kidney transplantation recipients, adjusted for all other factors previously shown to be associated with DGF.

Adult↗