PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

James H Corley

Publications and source records attributed to James H Corley.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Latex D-dimer signal in in situ femoral vein thrombus in swine and effect of minidose exogenous tissue plasminogen activator bolus.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We created in situ femoral vein thrombi in swine to investigate the response of the latex d-dimer signal to acute in situ venous thrombosis, and to determine the minimum dose of exogenous bolus tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) required to significantly elevate the d-dimer signal. STUDY DESIGN: We studied seven swine (20 to 22 kg) under pentobarbital anesthesia. A 6-cm segment of the proximal femoral vein was surgically exposed and briefly ligated. Thrombin, 250 U, was then injected into the isolated femoral vein segment to create an in situ clot. After clot formation was documented to be complete between the ligatures, they were then released. D-dimer levels were then measured every 15 min for 1 h before and 1 h after clot formation with ligatures released. Time-response curves to establish timing of peak t-PA effect were performed, and then escalating dose-response curves of d-dimer level to minidose t-PA were plotted. RESULTS: After formation of the clot, the release of ligatures resulted in no change in d-dimer levels over 1 h (p = 0.62) in all swine. When a time-response curve to exogenous t-PA bolus in the presence of femoral clot was plotted, there was a maximal increase in d-dimer signal at 30 min after bolus t-PA administration. The subsequent dose-response curves for escalating fivefold boluses of minidose t-PA showed an increase in d-dimer signal at doses of 0.8 mg (p = 0.03) and 4 mg (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: We conclude the following: (1) in situ femoral vein clot formation does not elevate d-dimer signal for 1 h after ligature release; (2) minidose t-PA boluses of 0.8 mg and 4 mg significantly elevated the latex d-dimer signal above baseline; and (3) there is a potential role of minidose t-PA in enhancing the d-dimer signal in in situ deep venous thrombosis.

Animals↗

18F protection issues: human and gamma-camera considerations.

OBJECTIVE: Two main issues in protecting radiation workers and the general public from (18)F radiation-distance from and lead shielding for an (18)F source-were investigated. We also examined the effect of an (18)F source on the counting rate of a neighboring gamma-camera. METHODS: The dose rates of an (18)F vial and a water-filled cylinder were measured using an ionization chamber at different distances with or without lead shielding. In addition, the counting rates of gamma-cameras in the presence of the (18)F cylinder were measured with different detector orientations, distances, and energy windows. RESULTS: The dose rate of a point or an extended source in air was proportional to the inverse square of the distance from the source. At 2 m, the dose rate for a 370-MBq (18)F source was less than 20 micro Gy in any single hour, which is the limit for unrestricted areas. The dose rate with 0.318-cm-thick lead shielding decreased to about 60%, and that with 5.08-cm-thick lead shielding decreased to about 4%; these rates were higher than those estimated using the narrow-beam attenuation formula. The scattered photons and characteristic x-rays from the lead brick and surrounding structures may have contributed to this result. The decrease in dose rate resulting from a 33% increase in distance was similar to the effect from shielding the source with 0.318-cm-thick lead. At 3 m from a 185-MBq (18)F source, the counting rate in the (99m)Tc window of an Orbiter camera was about 120,000/min when the detector faced the source. This rate was comparable to that of a typical (99m)Tc clinical study ( approximately 200,000/min). Only when the distance was increased to 11 m and the detector did not face the source did the counting rate decrease to the background level (3,234/min). The counting rate also depended on the energy window of the gamma-camera. On a Vertex camera, the counting rate of (18)F in the (99m)Tc window versus that in the (201)Tl (or (67)Ga) window was 1:1.7 (or 1:2.7). CONCLUSION: (18)F dose rate can be significantly reduced with distance. Lead shielding is not as effective as was predicted. (18)F sources should be kept substantial distances away from gamma-cameras to avoid contamination of image quality.

Environmental Exposure↗