Biomedical subjects

James Harnett

Publications and source records attributed to James Harnett.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Prospective observational study of patient-reported outcomes for azithromycin versus usual care in the treatment of bacterial acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

BACKGROUND: The 3-day course of azithromycin (AZM) 500 mg/d was introduced to the US market in June 2002. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) over a 1-month period in patients receiving a 3-day course of AZM for bacterial acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study evaluating outpatient adults with AECB who received either 3 days of AZM 500 mg/d or 5- to 14-day courses of other antibiotics (usual care [UC]) as directed by the clinician. Patients completed 2 HRQOL instruments-the SGRQ and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)-at baseline, day 14, and end of study (EOS) at days 24 to 28. In addition, patients kept a diary for the first 14 days after initiating antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight patients (57 AZM, 71 UC) were clinically evaluable. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in clinical presentation or baseline demographics, with the exception of a higher percentage of patients with diabetes mellitus in the UC group compared with the AZM group (16.9% vs 3.5%; P = 0.02). Both groups reported similar improvements in signs and symptoms, absenteeism, concomitant respiratory medication use, resource utilization, compliance, and treatment satisfaction as reported in the patient diary. The AZM group reported statistically significant improvement (simple contrasts for end of study vs baseline) in SGRQ measures (total score, P < 0.001; symptoms, P = 0.031; activity, P < 0.001; impacts, P < 0.001) and the SF-36 mental and physical summary components, compared with baseline (both, P < 0.001). Similarly, the UC group reported significant improvement in all SGRQ measures and in the SF-36 physical component score (P < 0.01), but not in the SF-36 mental component score, compared with baseline. At EOS, 80.0% of AZM patients and 59.0% of UC patients had a > or =4-point improvement on the SGRQ total score; however, this difference was not statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. In addition, 89.5% of AZM patients and 89.9% of UC patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment (P = NS). Resource utilization was similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, patients with AECB treated with a 3-day course of AZM experienced significant improvements in HRQOL as measured by a change of > or =4 points on the SGRQ and SF-36 physical and mental component scores versus baseline.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2005

A cost-minimization analysis comparing azithromycin-based and levofloxacin-based protocols for the treatment of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the CAP-IN trial.

BACKGROUND: A randomized trial was performed comparing azithromycin and levofloxacin for treating moderately to severely ill patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. This is a cost-minimization analysis comparing those regimens. METHODS: The cost-minimization analysis compares 81 patients receiving sequential therapy with IV azithromycin plus IV ceftriaxone followed by oral azithromycin with 82 patients receiving IV levofloxacin followed by oral levofloxacin, all with complete economic data over approximately 30 days, including information about hospitalization, study medications, home care, postdischarge utilization, and lost productivity. Units of utilization were multiplied by unit prices in order to estimate cost per patient. These total costs were compared using a two-sample t test. RESULTS: Direct medical costs of the azithromycin group were 2,481 US dollars less than the corresponding costs in the levofloxacin group (p = 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 238 US dollars to 4,724 US dollars). Most of the cost difference (2,300 US dollars) is attributable to hospital days, with the majority of these days being spent on the general medicine wards. The precise magnitude of the cost advantage attributable to azithromycin, if any, depends on both the reduction in length of hospital stay and its associated daily cost. CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin was no more costly than levofloxacin, and perhaps less so. Cost is but one of many factors that should be considered by clinicians in decisions involving any individual patient.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of erectile dysfunction therapy in patients previously nonadherent to long-term medications: a retrospective analysis of prescription claims.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) can lead to treatment noncompliance in patients taking medications for chronic health conditions. Using the Intelligent Health Repository, NDCHealth's longitudinal, United States health care claims database, we examined the impact of treating ED on adherence to long-term therapies in previously nonadherent patients. Male patients >or=18 years of age were identified who received antidepressant (AD), antihypertensive (AH), oral hypoglycemic (OHG), or lipid-lowering (LL) agents and initiated therapy with sildenafil citrate (Viagra) between January and June 2003. Treatment adherence was determined using medication possession ratios (MPRs) for the 12 months before and after the first prescription of sildenafil. Prior to initiation of therapy for ED with sildenafil, 64% of patients with comorbid medications were not adherent (MPR <0.8). Among these patients, 728 (27%) received AD, 2112 (78%) received AH, 984 (18%) received OHG, and 1078 (40%) received LL agents, with 66% of patients receiving multiple therapeutic classes. During the 12-month period after the first sildenafil prescription, patients had a significant increase in medication adherence compared with the 12 months before the first prescription of sildenafil (P < 0.0001). The percentage of patients who became adherent (MPR >or=0.8) with medications after sildenafil treatment was from 22% to 36%. With the exception of the LL group, there was a significant relationship between >or=3 sildenafil prescriptions and change in MPR (P < 0.05). Patients aged >or=65 years had similar improvement in MPR as patients <or=65 years. Treatment of ED with sildenafil improved adherence in patients taking common long-term medications who were previously nonadherent.

Adult↗