Biomedical subjects

James J Nawarskas

Publications and source records attributed to James J Nawarskas.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease.

PURPOSE: Clinical information regarding paclitaxel-eluting coronary artery stents is reviewed. SUMMARY: Restenosis is a significant complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. Coronary artery stenting has reduced restenosis compared with traditional balloon angioplasty, although restenosis still occurs with bare-metal coronary artery stents. The pathogenesis of in-stent restenosis is believed to involve smooth-muscle-cell proliferation and migration in response to vessel injury. A neointimal layer of extracellular matrix and collagen forms, which may impinge on the vessel lumen. Paclitaxel inhibits vascular smooth-muscle-cell proliferation and reduces neointimal mass. Local delivery of paclitaxel through a coronary stent has been shown to reduce restenosis rates and percent diameter stenosis and to produce other angiographic benefits compared with bare-metal stents. Fewer major adverse coronary events are seen with paclitaxel-eluting stents, predominantly because of a reduction in the need for target-vessel revascularization with minimal impact on rates of mortality and myocardial infarction (MI). The Taxus Express(2) stent, the only approved paclitaxel-eluting stent in the United States, costs about three times as much as a bare-metal stent. Cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to determine if the Taxus stent is cost-effective in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel-eluting stents reduce the rates of restenosis and target-vessel revascularization compared with bare-metal stents and have comparable effects on mortality and MI rates.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Levosimendan: a unique approach to the treatment of heart failure.

Levosimendan is one of the first agents of a new class of drugs known as calcium sensitizers. These drugs are believed to increase cardiac contractility by sensitizing cardiac myofibrils to calcium, and may therefore be of clinical benefit in the treatment of low-cardiac output states, particularly congestive heart failure. In addition to sensitizing troponin to intracellular calcium, levosimendan has been shown to inhibit phosphodiesterase III, which may contribute to its positive inotropic effect, and open adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-sensitive potassium channels (K(ATP)), which may produce vasodilation. Unlike currently available intravenous inotropes, levosimendan does not increase myocardial oxygen utilization, has not been shown to be proarrhythmic, and has been used effectively in the presence of beta-blocking medications. Levosimendan also has not been shown to impair ventricular relaxation, which was an initial concern with this class of drugs. Clinical studies of levosimendan have demonstrated short-term hemodynamic benefits of levosimendan over both placebo and dobutamine. While large-scale, long-term morbidity and mortality data are scarce, the Levosimendan Infusion versus Dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (LIDO) study suggested a mortality benefit of levosimendan over dobutamine up to 180 days after treatment. Clinical studies comparing levosimendan with other positive inotropes, namely milrinone, are lacking. Levosimendan treatment appears to be well-tolerated, with the primary adverse events being headache and hypotension. No clinically significant drug-drug interactions have been reported with levosimendan to date. The clinical future of levosimendan will depend on the results of larger, ongoing clinical trials.

Cardiotonic Agents↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Clopidogrel--statin interaction.

There has been recent concern regarding the potential for certain HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) to interfere with the activation of clopidogrel, thereby leaving patients susceptible to thrombotic events. Ex vivo studies have both supported and refuted an interaction, likely a result of heterogeneity in study design and methodology. More recent reports have been more consistent in demonstrating no increase in thrombotic event rates (myocardial infarction, stroke, etc) in patients receiving clopidogrel with a statin compared with clopidogrel alone, although these reports have all been retrospective in nature. Until a prospective study shows detriment when clopidogrel and statins are given together compared with either drug being administered alone, the debate regarding whether this interaction is of practical importance will continue. Until then, the weight of the evidence does not currently support a change in prescribing patterns for the sole purpose of avoiding a potential statin-clopidogrel interaction.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMedDate not supplied

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and coenzyme Q10.

The most concerning adverse reaction with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) is myotoxicity. Statins inhibit the production of mevalonate, a precursor of both cholesterol and coenzyme Q10, a compound believed to be crucial for mitochondrial function and the provision of energy for cellular processes. There is speculation that a reduction in coenzyme Q10 concentrations may promote the myopathies that have been associated with statin treatment as a result of mitochondrial damage. Although studies have repeatedly demonstrated a reduction in circulating coenzyme Q10 concentrations with statin therapy, it is unclear as to whether tissue levels of coenzyme Q10 are significantly affected. Coenzyme Q10 supplementation has been shown to reverse statin-induced decreases in circulating coenzyme Q10 concentrations, although the effect of supplementation on tissue coenzyme Q10 concentrations and any resulting clinical benefit has not been adequately assessed. Although there is not much of a safety concern with coenzyme Q10 supplementation, there is also not enough evidence to support its routine use for preventing the adverse effects of statin therapy, and it is therefore not recommended for this purpose at this time.

Coenzymes↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Ranolazine. A metabolic modulator for the treatment of chronic stable angina.

Ranolazine is a novel new antianginal agent currently under investigation as monotherapy and adjunct therapy for the treatment of chronic stable angina. While the mechanism of action of ranolazine is not completely understood, it is believed to involve a reduction in fatty acid oxidation, ultimately leading to a shift in myocardial energy production from fatty acid oxidation to glucose oxidation. Since the oxidation of glucose requires less oxygen than the oxidation of fatty acids, ranolazine can help maintain myocardial function in times of ischemia. In addition, ranolazine has minimal effect on blood pressure and heart rate. Ranolazine, by inhibiting cellular ionic channels, prolongs the corrected QT interval. However, ranolazine has not yet been associated with any incidences of ventricular arrhythmia. The clinical data with ranolazine focuses on its use in chronic stable angina, where it has been shown to increase exercise tolerance and decrease angina compared with placebo, as well as in combination with beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers. The use of ranolazine for other cardiac conditions and the effect of ranolazine on morbidity and mortality remains to be determined. Ongoing clinical trials will help further establish the role of ranolazine in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders.

Acetanilides↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The paclitaxel-eluting stent in percutaneous coronary intervention: part I: background and clinical comparison to bare metal stents.

The development of coronary artery stents that release (elute) a drug locally into the diseased vasculature has revolutionized the practice of interventional cardiology. These devices were designed to minimize the incidence of in-stent restenosis that may occur with bare metal stents. The paclitaxel-eluting stent is the most recent drug-eluting stent approved for use in the United States and is a bare metal stent coated with paclitaxel that is gradually released from the stent into the vessel wall with undetectable systemic concentrations of the drug. Paclitaxel functions to stabilize the assembly of microtubules, thereby interfering with cell division, motility, and shape, and ultimately inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, key processes in the development of neointimal hyperplasia during in-stent restenosis. Clinical trials have repeatedly demonstrated the superiority of the paclitaxel-eluting stent over the bare metal stent in terms of reducing restenosis rates and percent stenosis diameter as well as other angiographic end points. Although the rates of major adverse cardiac events are reduced with the paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with the bare metal stent, this is primarily the result of a reduction in the need for target vessel revascularization, whereas rates of myocardial infarction and death have not been shown to be significantly affected.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The paclitaxel-eluting stent in percutaneous coronary intervention: Part II. Comparison with the sirolimus-eluting stent, economics, and unanswered questions.

The paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents are currently the only drug-eluting stents approved for use in the United States. These 2 stents differ in terms of mechanism of drug action, the construct of the stent itself, and the drug delivery polymer. Clinical trials have demonstrated superiority of both paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents when compared with bare-metal stents in terms of reducing restenosis and the need for target vessel revascularization. Recently published head-to-head trials have not conclusively shown 1 drug-eluting stent to be superior to the other, but have demonstrated more favorable angiographic results with the sirolimus-eluting stent compared with the paclitaxel-eluting stent; however, no significant difference has been demonstrated in clinical outcomes such as myocardial infarction or death. In terms of economics, the paclitaxel-eluting stent is substantially more expensive than the bare-metal stent. However, by significantly reducing the risk of restenosis and need for repeat revascularization, the higher direct cost of the paclitaxel-eluting stent may in theory be offset by lower overall healthcare costs, although economic analyses have yet to definitively establish that the paclitaxel-eluting stent is truly cost-effective. There is still much to be discovered regarding the paclitaxel-eluting stent, specifically the optimal stent design and drug release mechanism, the relative safety and efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with other drug-eluting stents, the long-term effects of the paclitaxel-eluting stent, the ideal antiplatelet regimen to use in patients with a paclitaxel-eluting stent, the safety and efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting stent in various high-risk patient groups, and the ultimate cost-effectiveness of this device.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Eplerenone: a selective aldosterone receptor antagonist for hypertension and heart failure.

Aldosterone has been implicated for many years as an important substance in the pathogenesis of heart disease. Elevated aldosterone concentrations have been documented in patients with hypertension and heart failure, leading to the use of aldosterone antagonists for the treatment of these conditions. Spironolactone has been used for nearly 2 decades for the treatment of hypertension, and more recently, has become a standard agent for the treatment of systolic heart failure. Spironolactone, however, is a nonselective antagonist of the aldosterone receptor, binding also to other steroid receptors and causing a significant percentage of patients to have sex hormone-related adverse effects such as gynecomastia. Eplerenone is the first of a new class of drugs known as selective aldosterone receptor antagonists, which selectively block the aldosterone receptor with minimal effect at other steroid receptors, thereby minimizing many of the hormonal side effects seen with spironolactone. Eplerenone has been shown to be beneficial both as monotherapy and combination therapy for lowering elevated blood pressure in patients with hypertension. The antihypertensive efficacy of eplerenone is roughly similar to that of other antihypertensive agents, although in 1 study black patients responded better with eplerenone than losartan. In addition, eplerenone has demonstrated some renoprotective effects in diabetic patients with hypertension. Recently, eplerenone was shown to significantly reduce mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in post-myocardial infarction patients with systolic heart failure currently taking standard heart failure medications. Eplerenone is generally well tolerated, although hyperkalemia with this agent is of some concern. Eplerenone is metabolized by CYP3A4 and administration with potent inhibitors of this enzyme is contraindicated because of the risk of hyperkalemia. In summary, eplerenone has proven to be beneficial in treating hypertension and post-myocardial infarction heart failure. Its exact place in therapy will in large part be determined by its cost and whether or not future studies will be able to demonstrate a clinical benefit of this agent over spironolactone or other currently available treatments.

Aldosterone↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Ximelagatran: a new oral anticoagulant.

Although there have been many significant advances over the last 50 years with regards to anticoagulant therapy, warfarin remains the definitive standard for the long-term prevention of thromboembolic events in many patients at risk for these complications. Although effective, warfarin has a narrow therapeutic window, necessitating frequent laboratory monitoring for anticoagulant effect. Ximelagatran is an investigational anticoagulant that directly inhibits thrombin, unlike heparin or warfarin, which are indirect inhibitors. Although indirect thrombin inhibitors are mainly only effective at inhibiting circulating thrombin, direct thrombin inhibitors are able to inhibit both free and clot-bound thrombin, thereby producing more effective anticoagulation. Ximelagatran is the first orally available direct thrombin inhibitor to reach phase 3 clinical trials. Ximelagatran is a prodrug for the active metabolite melagatran, and has been demonstrated to have a relatively wide therapeutic window in terms of bleeding and antithrombotic effect compared with warfarin. Clinical studies have demonstrated ximelagatran to be comparable in efficacy to warfarin and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism, comparable to warfarin for stroke prevention in the setting of atrial fibrillation, and, when combined with aspirin, possible more effective than aspirin alone at preventing major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with a recent myocardial infarction. Adverse effects with ximelagatran primarily involve bleeding complications, which are more frequent than with placebo, but appear comparable to those occurring with standard anticoagulant treatment (ie, warfarin and LMWH). Ximelagatran has also been demonstrated to cause transient increases in liver enzymes, the significance of which will need to be addressed in ongoing phase 3 studies. Should ongoing trials prove ximelagatran to have at least similar therapeutic efficacy and safety as warfarin, ximelagatran may become a first-line anticoagulant due to its ease of administration and lack of a need for drug monitoring. The results of these trials are eagerly awaited in helping to defining the place in therapy for this promising new agent.

Administration, Oral↗