PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

James L Olds

Publications and source records attributed to James L Olds.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Intellectual property conundrum for the biological sciences.

Policy regarding academically generated biomedical intellectual property (IP) has been shaped by two important events: the Vannevar Bush report to then President Roosevelt in 1945 and the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. This policy, which vests the intellectual property produced from federally funded biomedical research from the government to the academic institution, was designed to promote technology transfer and thus promote the health of the U.S. economy. However, the policy has led to significant challenges, particularly in implementation. Here it is argued that the difficulties are due to differences in the structure of motivations between biomedical scientists, institutional officials, and private sector entrepreneurs. Understanding these differences may lead to a review of policy with the goal of enhancing technology transfer for the future.

Biological Science Disciplines↗

Partial reinforcement across trials impairs escape performance but spares place learning in the water maze.

We studied the effects of partial reinforcement on escape performance and place learning in the water maze. Rats given 50% reinforcement across trials (i.e. the escape platform was present only on odd trials) were compared to controls given 100% reinforcement (platform present on all trials). Control groups either received 8 or 4 trials per day, which was equal to either the total number of trials (100%-8) or reinforced escapes (100%-4) of the 50% group. Analysis of escape performance (latency) revealed that the 50% group was impaired relative to the 100%-8 group, but not the 100%-4 group, during the first 5 days of acquisition. The 50% group was impaired relative to both control groups on days 6-10 of overtraining. However, analyses of within-trial behavior (target annulus preference and thigmotaxis) on nonreinforced trials suggest that the 50% group did learn the location of the hidden platform (place information), in addition to a wall-based thigmotactic response. By dividing the 60s nonreinforced trials into three 20-s time bins, we were able to detect a significant preference for the target annulus early in the trial (bin 1 of trial 40 and bins 1-2 of trial 80). Further, there was a significant increase in time spent in the periphery of the pool, near the wall, in the last time bin of trial 40. Because the platform was in the middle zone, this behavior competed with a place response. We conclude that across-trial partial reinforcement procedures may promote response competition and mask evidence of place learning in addition to weakening escape performance late in training.

Animals↗

A room with a view and a polarizing cue: individual differences in the stimulus control of place navigation and passive latent learning in the water maze.

We investigated individual differences in the stimulus control of navigational behavior in the water maze by comparing measures of place learning in one environment to measures of latent learning (via passive placement on the goal platform) in a novel environment. In the first experiment, 12 rats were trained to find a slightly submerged hidden platform at a fixed location in room A for 10 days (4 trials/day). Fast and slow place learners were identified by their mean escape latency and cumulative distance to the goal during acquisition. The same animals were then given a 2-min passive placement on the submerged platform in room B. Latent learning was assessed by the animal's escape latency on a single swim trial immediately following the placement in room B. The results showed that the good latent learners in room B were not necessarily the fast place learners in room A. This weak correlation may be related to the fact that some rats swam near the area in room B that corresponded to the former goal location in room A relative to a common polarizing cue (i.e., the door/entrance to both rooms). When the view of the door was blocked in a second experiment a significant positive correlation between place acquisition and the latent learning test was obtained, although escape performance following passive placement was not improved. These findings suggest that while place navigation and latent learning via passive placement may involve some common cognitive-spatial function, other associative (S-S and/or S-R) processes that occur during place navigation/active movement may be required for animals to exhibit truly accurate navigational behavior characteristic of asymptotic escape performance in the water maze. Additional implications for neurobiological studies using a procedural pretraining design are discussed.

Animals↗