Biomedical subjects

James W Montgomery

Publications and source records attributed to James W Montgomery.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Effects of acoustic manipulation on the real-time inflectional processing of children with specific language impairment.

PURPOSE: This study reports the findings of an investigation designed to examine the effects of acoustic enhancement on the processing of low-phonetic-substance inflections (e.g., 3rd-person singular -s, possessive -s) versus a high-phonetic-substance inflection (e.g., present progressive -ing) by children with specific language impairment (SLI) in a word recognition, reaction time (RT) processing task. The effects of acoustic enhancement on the processing of the same morphemes as well as an additional morpheme (comparative -er) were examined in an offline grammaticality judgment task. The grammatical function of 1 of the higher-phonetic-substance inflections, -ing, was presumed to be hypothesized relatively early by children; the function of the other, -er, was presumed to be hypothesized relatively late. METHOD: Sixteen children with SLI (age(M) = 9 years;0 months) and 16 chronological age (CA; age(M) = 8;11) children participated. For both tasks, children listened to sentences containing the target morphemes as they were produced naturally (natural condition) or with acoustic enhancement (enhanced condition). RESULTS: On the RT task, the children with SLI demonstrated RT sensitivity only to the presence of the high-substance inflection, irrespective of whether it was produced naturally or with enhancement. Acoustic enhancement had no effect on these children's processing of low-substance inflections. The CA children, by contrast, showed sensitivity to low-substance inflections when they were produced naturally and with acoustic enhancement. These children also showed sensitivity to the high-substance inflection in the natural condition, but in the enhanced condition they demonstrated significantly slower RT. On the grammaticality judgment task, the children with SLI performed worse than the CA children overall and showed especially poor performance on low-substance inflections. Acoustic enhancement had a beneficial effect on the inflectional processing of the children with SLI, but it had no effect on CA children. CONCLUSION: The findings are interpreted to suggest that the reduced language processing capacity of children with SLI constrains their ability to process low-substance grammatical material in real time. This factor should be considered along with any difficulty that might be attributable to the grammatical function of the inflection.

Child↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Working memory and comprehension in children with specific language impairment: what we know so far.

Many children with specific language impairments (SLI) demonstrate deficits in the areas of verbal working memory and language learning/processing. In this article, evidence is reviewed suggesting that the lexical/morphological learning and sentence comprehension/processing problems of many of these children are associated with their deficient working memory functioning. Evidence is also reviewed for the possibility that deficient working memory provides a clinical marker of SLI. A number of potentially useful assessment and intervention techniques are offered, as well as several directions for future research. The reader will be introduced to two prominent models of verbal working memory (phonological working memory model, functional working memory) and how each model potentially relates to (a) various language abilities in typically developing children, (b) the morphological and lexical learning abilities in children with specific language impairment (SLI), and (c) the sentence comprehension of children with SLI. The reader will also be provided a variety of clinical suggestions on how to assess and treat the working memory and language processing problems of children with SLI. Finally, some suggestions for future research will also be offered.

Child↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of input rate and age on the real-time language processing of children with specific language impairment.

BACKGROUND: School-age children with specific language impairment (SLI) exhibit slower real-time (i.e. immediate) language processing relative to same-age peers. The offline sentence comprehension of children with SLI can be improved when the input is slowed down. Although this finding suggests that a slower input delivery facilitates these children's language processing, such an interpretation is premature, as there are no data directly addressing the issue. Additionally, while typically developing (TD) children demonstrate age-related improvements in language processing (i.e. they become faster processors), it is unclear whether children with SLI show the same developmental improvement. AIMS: It was investigated whether a reduced input rate can enhance the online language processing of children with SLI. If it does, their reaction time (RT) for recognizing words embedded in sentences delivered at a slow rate should be faster relative to words in normal- and fast-rate sentences. For TD children, RT should be unaffected by rate manipulation, as their language-processing system is sufficiently robust to handle such a simple input manipulation. A secondary aim was to provide preliminary data on the developmental course of language processing proficiency in children with SLI. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Twenty school-age children with SLI and 20 age-matched TD children completed a word recognition RT task. Children monitored simple sentences for a target word and made a timed response immediately upon recognizing the target. Sentences were presented at 'normal', 'slow' and 'fast' speaking rates. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: There was a significant group by input rate interaction. Children with SLI, relative to TD peers, yielded significantly slower RT for normal- and fast-rate sentences, but faster RT for slow-rate sentences. Within-group analyses showed the children with SLI produced the fastest RT for slow-rate sentences and the slowest RT for fast-rate sentences. The TD children showed the opposite response pattern: the fastest RT for fast-rate sentences and the slowest RT for slow-rate sentences. Age also had a significant effect. Regardless of language status, older children produced faster RT than younger children. Interestingly, even the oldest children with SLI still demonstrated significantly slower RT than the youngest TD children. CONCLUSIONS: The real-time language processing of children with SLI can be facilitated when the material is presented at a slower rate. A slower rate apparently allows these children time to allocate their attentional resources more effectively to the various processing operations supporting comprehension. Additionally, the language proficiency of children with SLI improves with age. However, older children with SLI are still slower than their youngest TD peers, suggesting that the language-processing apparatus of children with SLI operates even more inefficiently than what their receptive language knowledge might otherwise predict.

Age Factors↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Real-time language processing in school-age children with specific language impairment.

BACKGROUND: School-age children with specific language impairment (SLI) exhibit slower real-time (i.e. immediate) language processing relative to same-age peers and younger, language-matched peers. Results of the few studies that have been done seem to indicate that the slower language processing of children with SLI is due to inefficient higher-order linguistic processing and not to difficulties with more basic acoustic-phonetic processing. However, this claim requires further experimental verification. AIMS: It was investigated whether the real-time language processing deficit of children with SLI arises from inferior acoustic-phonetic processing, inefficient linguistic processing, or both poor sensory processing and linguistic processing. If these children's impaired online language processing is due to inferior acoustic-phonetic processing, then their reaction time (RT) for recognizing words presented in list fashion should be significantly longer relative to control children's RT. If, however, their impaired language processing relates to inefficient linguistic processing, then, relative to control children, their RT for word-list-presented words should be comparable and their sentence-embedded word-recognition RT should be significantly longer. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Sixteen school-age children with SLI, 16 age-matched (CA) typically developing children, and 16 receptive-syntax matched (RS) children completed two word-recognition RT tasks. In one task, children monitored word lists for the occurrence of a target word (isolated lexical processing task). In the second task, children monitored simple sentences for a target word (sentence-embedded lexical processing task). In both tasks, children made a timed response immediately upon recognizing the target. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Children with SLI and CA children showed comparable RT in the isolated lexical processing task and both were faster than RS children. In the sentence-processing task, children with SLI were slower at lexical processing than CA and RS children, with CA children demonstrating the fastest processing. CONCLUSIONS: The real-time language processing of children with SLI appears to be attributable to inefficient higher-order linguistic processing operations and not to inferior acoustic-phonetic processing. The slower language processing of children with SLI relative to younger, language-matched children suggests that the language mechanism of children with SLI operates more slowly than what might otherwise be predicted by their linguistic competence.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Executive functions in elementary school children with and without problems in written expression.

This study examined the executive functioning of 55 elementary school children with and without problems in written expression. Two groups reflecting children with and without significant writing problems were defined by an average primary trait rating across two separate narratives. The groups did not differ in terms of chronological age, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, special education status, or presence of attention problems or receptive vocabulary capabilities; however, they did differ in reading decoding ability, and this variable was controlled for in all analyses. Dependent measures included tasks tapping an array of executive functions grouped conceptually in accordance with a model of executive functioning reflecting the following domains: initiate, sustain, set shifting, and inhibition/stopping. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) procedures revealed statistically significant group differences on the initiation and set shift domains, with the sustaining domain approaching significance. Children with writing problems performed more poorly in each of these domains, although the effect sizes were small. A multiple regression that employed these four factors and the reading decoding variable to predict the primary trait score from the written narratives revealed a statistically significant regression function; however, reading decoding contributed most of the unique variance to the writing outcome. These findings point out the importance of executive functions in the written language process for elementary school students, but highlight the need to examine other variables when studying elementary school-age children with written expression problems.

Child↗