Biomedical subjects

Jan Churan

Publications and source records attributed to Jan Churan.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Temporal reproduction: further evidence for two processes.

Some authors have suggested separate mechanisms for the processing of temporal intervals above versus below 2-3s. Given that the evidence is mixed, the present experiment was carried out as a critical test of the separate-mechanism hypothesis. Subjects reproduced five standard durations of 1-5s presented in the auditory and visual modalities. The Corsi-block test was used to assess effects of working-memory span on different interval lengths. Greater working-memory span was associated with longer reproductions of intervals of 3-5s. A factor analysis run on mean reproduced intervals revealed one modality-unspecific factor for durations of 1-2s and two modality-specific factors for longer intervals. These results are interpreted as further indications that two different processes underlie temporal reproductions of shorter and longer intervals.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2006

Temporal processing and context dependency of phoneme discrimination in patients with aphasia.

Standard diagnostic procedures for assessing temporal-processing abilities of adult patients with aphasia have so far not been developed. In our study, temporal-order measurements were conducted using two different experimental procedures to identify a suitable measure for clinical studies. Additionally, phoneme-discrimination abilities were tested on the word, as well as on the sentence level, as a relationship between temporal processing and phoneme-discrimination abilities is assumed. Patients with aphasia displayed significantly higher temporal-order thresholds than control subjects. The detection of an association between temporal processing and speech processing, however, depended on the stimuli and the phoneme-discrimination tasks used. Our results also suggest top-down feedback on phonemic processing.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Assessment of auditory temporal-order thresholds - a comparison of different measurement procedures and the influences of age and gender.

PURPOSE: The relationship between auditory temporal-order perception and phoneme discrimination has been discussed for several years, based on findings, showing that patients with cerebral damage in the left hemisphere and aphasia, as well as children with specific language impairments, show deficits in temporal-processing and phoneme discrimination. Over the last years several temporal-order measurement procedures and training batteries have been developed. However, there exists no standard diagnostic tool for adults that could be applied to patients with aphasia. Therefore, our study aimed at identifying a feasible, reliable and efficient measurement procedure to test for auditory-temporal processing in healthy young and elderly adults, which in a further step can be applied to patients with aphasia. METHODS: The tasks varied according to adaptive procedures (staircase vs. maximum-likelihood), stimuli (tones vs. clicks) and stimulation modes (binaural- vs. alternating monaural) respectively. A phoneme-discrimination task was also employed to assess the relationship between temporal and language processing. RESULTS: The results show that auditory temporal-order thresholds are stimulus dependent, age related, and influenced by gender. Furthermore, the cited relationship between temporal-order threshold and phoneme discrimination can only be confirmed for measurements with pairs of tones. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate, that different norms have to be established for different gender and age groups. Furthermore, temporal-order measurements with tones seem to be more suitable for clinical intervention studies than measurements with clicks, as they show higher re-test reliabilities, and only for measurements with tones an association with phoneme-discrimination abilities was found.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2004

Motion perception without explicit activity in areas MT and MST.

It is widely accepted that middle temporal (MT) and middle superior temporal (MST) cortical areas in the brain of rhesus monkeys are essential for processing visual motion. We asked whether this assumption holds true if the moving stimulus consists of a second-order motion stimulus. In addition, we asked whether neurons in area MT and MST code for moving sound sources. To answer these questions, we trained three rhesus monkeys on a direction-discrimination task. Our monkeys were able to correctly report the direction of all motion stimuli used in this study. Firing rates of directionally selective neurons from area MT (n = 38) and MST (n = 68) were recorded during task performance. These neurons coded only for the stimulus movement if the motion stimulus was separated from the background by luminance or flicker (Fourier and drift-balanced motion). If these segregation cues were absent (in the case of theta motion and of the moving sound source), firing rates did not code for the stimulus' direction. Therefore we conclude that although areas MT and MST are undoubtedly involved in processing a moving stimulus, they are not the final cortical stages responsible for perceiving it.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2002

Flicker in the visual background impairs the ability to process a moving visual stimulus.

For the detection of a moving object, segregating the object from the background is a necessary first step. This segregation can be achieved by detection of differences in the spatial, temporal and spatio-temporal properties of the object and background. Here we investigate how flicker influences the perception of a moving object in man and monkey, and we examine the neuronal responses in extrastriate medial temporal and medial superior temporal areas (MT and MST) of two rhesus monkeys. The performance of humans and monkeys in a direction discrimination task was impaired in the presence of flicker in the background compared to the static background condition. A similar effect was found in recordings from 155 single units in areas MT and MST during the discrimination task. The discriminability (d') of the neuronal responses in preferred and nonpreferred directions was reduced by 33% on average in the presence of a flicker background compared to the static background. This reduction in discriminability was not caused by differences in variance of the neuronal activity for the two background conditions, but was due to a reduction of the difference between the activities in preferred and nonpreferred direction. This reduction in directional selectivity could be traced back to two different mechanisms: in 32 out of 155 neurons (21%), the decrease resulted from an increase in the response to the stimulus moving in the nonpreferred direction; in 62 out of 155 neurons (40%), the reduction in directional selectivity was due to a decrease in the response to the preferred direction. These results give deeper insights into how moving stimuli are processed in the presence of background flicker as present in natural visual scenes.

Action Potentials↗