Jan Meulstee | PubMed Health

PubMed2005

Prospective randomized controlled study comparing simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: Part 1.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of participants treated by simple decompression (SD) of the ulnar nerve versus anterior subcutaneous transposition (AST). METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study was performed. Three hundred forty participants were referred to our institution between March 1999 and July 2002. One hundred fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomized into two surgical groups: 75 were assigned to SD, and 77 were assigned to AST. Participants were followed for 1 year after surgery. The main outcome measure was clinical outcome 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: An excellent or good result was obtained in 49 of 75 participants who underwent SD and in 54 of 77 participants undergoing AST. The difference was not statistically significant. However, the complication rate was statistically lower in the SD group (9.6%) compared with the AST group (31.1%) (risk ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.69). Duration of symptoms, (sub)luxation of the ulnar nerve, and severity of the complaints did not influence outcome. CONCLUSION: Surgery for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is effective. The outcomes of SD and AST are equivalent, except for the complication rate. Because the intervention is simpler and associated with fewer complications, SD is advised, even in the presence of (sub)luxation.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Simple decompression or anterior subcutaneous transposition for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a cost-minimization analysis--Part 2.

OBJECTIVE: A randomized controlled trial was reported recently, in which simple decompression and anterior subcutaneous transposition were compared for treatment of ulnaropathy at the elbow. Clinically, both surgical options seem to be equally effective. The objective of this study is to compare the costs, from a societal standpoint, of simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition in Euros. METHODS: Published and unpublished data from a randomized controlled trial that compared simple decompression and anterior subcutaneous transposition were used. The investigators tabulated the actual costs incurred for professional fees, use of the operating room, duration of sick leave, reintervention, and treatment of complications directly related to the surgical treatment. RESULTS: The total costs per group and per patient were statistically significantly less for those treated with simple decompression. The total median costs per patient were 1124 Euros for simple decompression and 2730 Euros for anterior subcutaneous transposition. The main difference was in the costs related to sick leave, which is significantly shorter for simple decompression. There also was a statistically significant difference in operation time in favor of simple decompression. A remarkable finding was that paid workers in both treatment groups returned to work much later than unpaid workers. CONCLUSION: Although clinically equally effective, simple decompression was associated with lower cost than anterior subcutaneous transposition for the treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Compared with anterior subcutaneous transposition, we recommend simple decompression for the treatment of idiopathic ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Absenteeism↗