Biomedical subjects

Jane A Schulz

Publications and source records attributed to Jane A Schulz.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Reflection on academic protected time: an opportunity to integrate educational programs.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify the structure of academic protected time curriculum and to determine interest in a knowledge-sharing, web-based initiative. METHODS: We undertook a survey of the 16 obstetrics and gynaecology program directors in Canada. RESULTS: The response rate was 88%. Seventy-one percent of the responding program directors are responsible for developing protected time curriculum. Seventy-eight percent use a template based on a two-year rotation of topics, 64% use lectures as the main educational format, and 50% have incorporated professional competencies into academic time. The largest barrier to curriculum development is time constraints. Seventy-eight percent of program directors are interested in a network for sharing ideas. CONCLUSIONS: In most programs, the curriculum for academic protected time is developed by program directors, who are dependent upon lectures and limited by time constraints. Programs therefore have difficulty integrating professional competencies into the academic curriculum. This educational environment could prove fertile ground for establishing a collaborative curriculum initiative.

Alberta↗

PubMed2006

Success of pubovaginal sling in patients with stress urinary incontinence and efficacy of vaginal sling release in patients with post-sling voiding dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the overall success of sling procedures and surgical sling release in achieving urinary continence and voiding function in women with stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 107 patients with stress urinary incontinence who had a two-team abdominal-vaginal fascial sling procedure performed between January 2000 and December 2003. Data reviewed included the patients' medical history, demographic data, findings on physical examination, urodynamic studies, operative report, and findings at visits 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Patients with sling releases were followed up to assess pelvic organ prolapse, uroflowmetry, and post-void residual urine volume, and to complete the quality of life questionnaire IIQ-7. RESULTS: At one year after pubovaginal sling surgery, 82.1% of patients were cured of stress urinary incontinence. The majority (85.1%) of patients did not develop postoperative voiding dysfunction. Only 5.6% of those who did develop postoperative voiding dysfunction required surgical sling release. Sling release resolved the post-sling voiding dysfunction in three out of five patients. CONCLUSION: Pubovaginal sling surgery is a highly successful strategy for the management of stress urinary incontinence and has a low rate of postoperative voiding dysfunction. Surgical sling release may resolve post-sling voiding dysfunction.

Female↗

PubMed2005

Vaginal pessaries in managing women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: patient characteristics and factors contributing to success.

OBJECTIVE: An aging population has resulted in higher prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study examines a nurse-run clinic and analyzes the factors contributing to successful pessary use. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of 1,216 patients was completed. History, pelvic examination and pessary fitting was done. Data was analyzed utilizing a categorical model of maximum-likelihood estimation to investigate relationships. RESULTS: Median patient age was 63 years. Median number of pessaries tried was two. Eighty-five percent of post-menopausal women were on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prior to fitting. Highest success rate of 78% was in the group on both systemic and local HRT. Success rates ranged from 58% for urge incontinence to 83% for uterine prolapse. Prior vaginal surgery was a factor impacting success. In our series highest success rates for fitting were obtained with ring pessaries, ring with support, and gellhorns. CONCLUSIONS: This model is a viable, option for the conservative management of UI and POP. Local HRT plays an important role in successful pessary fitting. Complications are rare.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Bulking agents for stress urinary incontinence: short-term results and complications in a randomized comparison of periurethral and transurethral injections.

The purpose of our study was to compare the two standard routes of urethral bulking injection in a prospective randomized trial. Forty women with genuine stress incontinence (n = 36), or mixed incontinence with a minor and controlled urge component (n = 4), participated in a urethral bulking agent trial. All patients had a standardized preoperative evaluation which included history, physical examination, assignment of incontinence status on a Stamey grading scale, postvoid residual (PVR) determination, Valsalva leak-point pressure, maximal urethral closure pressure, functional urethral length, Q-tip excursion angle, quantitative pad test, and completion of a quality of life questionnaire. On the day of injection they were randomly assigned to a periurethral or transurethral route of injection based on a computer-generated block randomization scheme. An ultrasound-determined PVR was obtained on all patients after injection. If self-catheterization was necessary, and the PVR was > 200 ml, urinary retention was diagnosed. Postoperative assessment included a patient interview, subjective assessment of improvement, PVR, voiding diary, and assignment of incontinence grade. At the screening visit there were no significant differences between the groups for any variables except type of stress incontinence. With short-term follow-up both transurethral and periurethral routes of injection seem to be equally efficacious. In the periurethral injection group there was a higher rate of postoperative retention; this group had a significantly higher volume of injectable agent used. There was no significant difference in risk of urinary tract infections between the two groups. We conclude that both periurethral and transurethral methods of bulking agent injection for stress urinary incontinence are equally efficacious, with minimal morbidity.

Adult↗