Biomedical subjects

Jane E Joseph

Publications and source records attributed to Jane E Joseph.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

fMRI correlates of cortical specialization and generalization for letter processing.

The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine cortical specialization for letter processing. We assessed whether brain regions that were involved in letter processing exhibited domain-specific and/or mandatory responses, following Fodor's definition of properties of modular systems (Fodor, J.A., 1983. The Modularity of Mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.). Domain-specificity was operationalized as selective, or exclusive, activation for letters relative to object and visual noise processing and a baseline fixation task. Mandatory processing was operationalized as selective activation for letters during both a silent naming and a perceptual matching task. In addition to these operational definitions, other operational definitions of selectivity for letter processing discussed by [Pernet, C., Celsis, P., Demonet, J., 2005. Selective response to letter categorization within the left fusiform gyrus. NeuroImage 28, 738-744] were applied to the data. Although the left fusiform gyrus showed a specialized response to letters using the definition of selectivity put forth by [Pernet, C., Celsis, P., Demonet, J., 2005. Selective response to letter categorization within the left fusiform gyrus. NeuroImage 28, 738-744], this region did not exhibit specialization for letters according to our more conservative definition of selectivity. Instead, this region showed equivalent activation by letters and objects in both the naming and matching tasks. Hence, the left fusiform gyrus does not exhibit domain-specific or mandatory processing but may reflect a shared input system for both stimulus types. The left insula and some portions of the left inferior parietal lobule, however, did show a domain-specific response for letter naming but not for letter matching. These regions likely subserve some linguistically oriented cognitive process that is unique to letters, such as grapheme-to-phoneme translation or retrieval of phonological codes for letter names. Hence, cortical specialization for letters emerged in the naming task in some peri-sylvian language related cortices, but not in occipito-temporal cortex. Given that the domain-specific response for letters in left peri-sylvian regions was only present in the naming task, these regions do not process letters in a mandatory fashion, but are instead modulated by the linguistic nature of the task.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

fMRI in alert, behaving monkeys: an adaptation of the human infant familiarization novelty preference procedure.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is increasingly used in non-human primate research. In the present study, we adapt the familiarization-novelty preference (FNP) procedure used in human infant research to examine visual behavior in alert, unanaesthetized rhesus monkeys that were acclimated to the fMRI environment, but did not undergo behavioral training. In keeping with the typical FNP paradigm, we recorded eye movements (looking time and number of fixations) while monkeys viewed a series of four identical pictures (familiarization phase) followed by two different pictures (novelty phase). Number of fixations and looking time both increased during the novelty phase, thereby demonstrating visual discrimination of the new from the old picture. Importantly, discrimination did not occur on catch trials in which six identical pictures were presented. Moreover, brain activation in the amygdala was more strongly associated with the novelty phase than with the familiarization phase. In addition, magnitude of brain activation in the amygdala was correlated with the behavioral effect of visual discrimination. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of using eye movements as an index of visual discrimination in untrained monkeys during fMRI scanning. This methodological approach helps to extend the repertoire of research tools for fMRI in non-human primates.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2006

The involvement of the inferior parietal cortex in the numerical Stroop effect and the distance effect in a two-digit number comparison task.

The neural mechanism of number representation and processing is currently under extensive investigation. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study, we designed a number comparison task to examine how people represent and compare two-digit numbers in the brain, and whether they process the decade and unit digits in parallel. We manipulated the decade-unit-digit congruency and numerical distance between the pairs of numbers. We observed both Stroop-like interference and the distance effect in the participants' performance. People responded more slowly to incongruent pairs of numbers and pairs of a smaller distance. The inferior parietal cortex showed common and distinct patterns of activation for both attentional selection and number comparison processes, and its activity was modulated by the Stroop-like interference effect and the distance effect. Taken together, these results support both parallel and holistic comparison of two-digit numbers in the brain.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Cortical regions associated with different aspects of object recognition performance.

In the present object recognition study, we examined the relationship between brain activation and four behavioral measures: error rate, reaction time, observer sensitivity, and response bias. Subjects perceptually matched object pairs in which structural similarity (SS), an index of structural differentiation, and exposure duration (DUR), an index of task difficulty, were manipulated. The SS manipulation affected the fMRI signal in the left anterior fusiform and parietal cortices, which in turn reflected a bias to respond same. Conversely, an SS-modulated fMRI signal in the right middle frontal gyrus reflected a bias to respond different. The DUR manipulation affected the fMRI signal in occipital and posterior fusiform regions, which in turn reflected greater sensitivity, longer reaction times, and greater accuracy. These findings demonstrate that the regions most strongly implicated in processing object shape (SS-modulated regions) are associated with response bias, whereas regions that are not directly involved in shape processing are associated with successful recognition performance.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Shared and dissociated cortical regions for object and letter processing.

The present study determined the extent to which object and letter recognition recruit similar or dissociated neural resources. Participants passively viewed and silently named line drawings of objects, single letters, and visual noise patterns and centrally fixated an asterisk. We used whole-brain functional MRI and a very conservative approach to hypothesis testing that distinguished among brain regions that were selectively activated by different experimental conditions and those that were conjointly activated. The left fusiform gyrus (BA 19 & 37) and left inferior frontal cortex BA(44/6) showed a greater degree of conjoined activation for objects and letters than selective activation for either category, whereas left inferior parietal cortex (BA 40) and the left insula showed a strong letter-selective response. Equal recruitment of left fusiform and inferior frontal regions by objects and letters reflects similar demands on cognitive processing by these two categories and argues against category-specific modules in these regions. However, cortical systems for object and letter processing are not completely shared given the exclusive activation of left inferior parietal cortex by letters.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Effects of structural similarity on neural substrates for object recognition.

Human occipitotemporal cortex (OTC) is critically involved in object recognition, but the functional organization of this brain region is controversial. In the present study, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal changes were recorded in humans during an animal-matching task that parametrically varied degree of structural (i.e., shape) similarity among the items. fMRI signal in the mid- to anterior-fusiform gyrus increased as animals overlapped more in terms of structure and as reaction time increased. In contrast, relatively more posterior aspects of the fusiform gyrus and inferior occipital cortex showed greater fMRI signal when the animals overlapped less in terms of structure. A similar organization emerged when three-dimensional geometric shapes were matched, indicating that OTC is differentially tuned to varying degrees of overlap in object structure, regardless of taxonomic category. We discuss how the present findings fit in with current functional neuroanatomical approaches to object recognition.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Hypothesis testing for selective, differential, and conjoined brain activation.

Hypothesis testing in functional neuroimaging studies relies heavily on the computation of categorical contrasts in which brain activation associated with one experimental condition is assessed relative to brain activation associated with a different experimental condition. Often, multiple pair-wise contrasts are computed and reported independently. Here we describe an approach to hypothesis testing that logically combines multiple pair-wise contrasts to distinguish among selective, differential and conjoined brain activation patterns. Using a sample dataset in which participants viewed objects, visual noise patterns or a fixation cross, we demonstrate that selective and differential brain activation patterns are often confounded with current approaches to hypothesis testing but that the logical combination approach can distinguish between these two types of data patterns. Specifically, we show that brain regions that respond selectively to an object recognition task relative to viewing visual noise or a fixation cross (selective activation) are mutually exclusive from brain regions that show a graded response to object viewing, noise viewing and visual fixation (differential activation). We thus show that the logical combination approach sufficiently constrains the results of categorical contrasts to reflect only the data pattern that would be predicted from the cognitive processing account under investigation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Natural and manufactured objects activate the fusiform face area.

Recent fMRI studies indicate that the anterior fusiform gyrus (the fusiform face area, FFA) is specialized for face recognition. However, the analyses used to determine face selectivity have not ruled out the possibility that other object categories produce significant activation in the FFA, relative to baseline. In the current fMRI study, we use a conservative hypothesis testing approach to show that FFA activation is not selective for faces. Rather, the FFA response is almost completely explained by a graded response in which faces produce more activation than either manufactured or natural objects, but those categories produce a statistically greater response than the baseline task. These findings question whether the FFA can be interpreted as a specialized module for face recognition.

Adult↗